⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

13 opinions for “Velasquez v. Amazon.com Services”

District Court, E.D. California · 2015-10-08 · Published · cited 108× · 310 F.R.D. 593; 92 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1562; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138666; 2015 WL 5916750
ORDER GRANTING RULE 23 CLASS CERTIFICATION, GRANTING FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION, AND DENYING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF RULE 23 CLASS AND FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT (ECF No. 43) ANTHONY W. ISHII, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE I. Introduction Plaintiff Nicholas Millan (“Plaintiff’), on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, filed this class act
District Court, C.D. California · 2010-09-10 · Published · cited 43× · 736 F. Supp. 2d 1257; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98034; 2010 WL 3517399
736 F.Supp.2d 1257 (2010) Darren GRANT, an individual; Plaintiff, v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, INC, a Delaware Corporation; Quality Loan Service Corporation; a California Corporation; and Does 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. CV 09-08174 MM(CTx). United States District Court, C.D. California. September 10, 2010. *1260 Dana Milme
Washington Supreme Court · 2011-04-14 · Published · cited 44× · 171 Wash. 2d 260
Madsen, C.J. ¶1 Plaintiffs challenge AT&T Wireless Services Inc.’s billing practices. They sought nationwide class certification, which was denied. The Court of Appeals reversed. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.1 FACTS ¶2 Customers of AT&T filed a nationwide class action alleging the company misle
Washington Supreme Court · 2011-04-14 · Published · cited 42× · 259 P.3d 129
259 P.3d 129 (2011) 171 Wash.2d 260 Martin SCHNALL, a New Jersey resident; Jeananne Aguirre; Nathan Riensche, a Washington resident; Kelly Lemons, a California resident, individually and on behalf of all the members of the class of persons similarly situated, Respondents, John Girard, a California resident; Sean O'Day, a Florida resident, Plaintiffs, v. AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a domestic corporation, Petiti
Washington Supreme Court · 2010-02-09 · Published · cited 7× · 225 P.3d 929
225 P.3d 929 (2010) Martin SCHNALL, a New Jersey resident; Jeananne Aguirre; Nathan Riensche, a Washington resident; Kelly Lemons, a California resident, individually and on behalf of all the members of the class of persons similarly situated, Respondents, John Girard, a California resident; Sean O'Day, a Florida resident, Plaintiffs, v. AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a domestic corporation, Petitioner. No. 80572-5.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-07-05 · Published · cited 46× · 39 F.4th 309
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 5, 2022 No. 21-40512 Lyle
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-07-05 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 21-40512 Document: 00516381649 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/05/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
District Court, D. Nevada · 2012-03-08 · Published · cited 1× · 838 F. Supp. 2d 1102; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31482; 2012 WL 764424
ORDER (Motion to Dismiss-# 12) ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge. Before the Court is Justimtv, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (# 12, filed Sept. 16, 2011) based on a failure to state a claim and immunity from suit under § 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The Court has also considered Zuffa, LLC’s Opposition (# 18, filed Oct. 24), and Justin.tv’s Reply (# 24, filed Dec. 2).
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2026-07-01 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS SHARON SCHRAM, FOR PUBLICATION July 01, 2026 Plaintiff-Appellant, 2:45
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2015-07-10 · Published · cited 8× · 114 F. Supp. 3d 1067; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90162; 2015 WL 4232374
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District • Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The court conducted a non-jury trial in this case on May 5-8, 11-14, and 27-29, 2015. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a), the following constitute the court’s Findings of Fact (“Findings”) and Conclusions of Law (“Conclusions”). To' the extent any Finding
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011-08-09 · Published · cited 4× · 455 B.R. 373; 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 2966; 55 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 80; 2011 WL 3444060
455 B.R. 373 (2011) In re ARCADE PUBLISHING, INC., Debtor. No. 09-13636(MG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. August 9, 2011. *375 Rosen & Associates, P.C., By: Nancy L. Kourland, Esq., NY, for the Debtor and Debtor in Possession. The Law Office of Anthony N. Elia, P.C., By: Anthony N. Elia, Esq., New York, NY, f