Cases

ALTENBERND, Judge. Inside the vault at Sarasota Vault Depository, Inc., there is a lock box purported to contain more than $5,000,000 in rare, red beryl gems. Sarasota Vault claims no interest in these gems, but many of the remaining parties in the style of this case do. Sarasota Vault filed a complaint seeking to interplead these gems or, in the alternative, to obtain a declara

Osiris Holding of Maryland LLC, et al. v. Daniels, No. 1774, September Term, 2023. Opinion by Graeff, J. NEGLIGENCE—DISINTERMENT—STANDARD OF CARE A cemetery has a duty of care in disinterring or otherwise handling a dead body. Although expert testimony may be required in a negligence suit against a cemetery, it was not required in this case. Industry standards can be admitted to show the applicable standard of care in a negligence cause of action, and in this case, Mrs. Daniels presented evide

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 22, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D17-2443 Lower Tribunal No. 15-27242 ________________ Sea Vault Partners, LLC, &

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 22, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D17-2443 Lower Tribunal No. 15-27242 ________________ Sea Vault Partners, LLC, &

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION To the Appellate Division, Superior Court: A petition for certification of the judgment in A-001578-14 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same; It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.

McEvers, Justice. *456[¶1] Steve Forster, Daniel Krebs, and Debra Krebs (collectively "Forster/Krebs") appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claims against B&B Hot Oil Service, Inc. We conclude the district court correctly construed the language in the parties' lease agreement, as a whole, to operate as a waiver of claims agains

1 Scythian Ltd.; Cloud 9 Investments, LLC; and Cloud 9 Land Holdings, LLC, Petitioners v. Town of Mountain Village, Colorado; Town of Mountain Village Town Council, Colorado; Tiara Telluride, LLC; and Vault Management, LLC, Respondents No. 25SC226 Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc December 22, 2025

1 Scythian Ltd.; Cloud 9 Investments, LLC; and Cloud 9 Land Holdings, LLC, Petitioners v. Town of Mountain Village, Colorado; Town of Mountain Village Town Council, Colorado; Tiara Telluride, LLC; and Vault Management, LLC. Respondents No. 25SC227 Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc December 22, 2025

704 S.E.2d 858 (2010) SAVANNAH CEMETERY GROUP, INC. et al. v. DEPUE-WILBERT VAULT COMPANY et al. No. A10A1152. Court of Appeals of Georgia. December 1, 2010. *861 Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever, Anthony L. Cochran, Atlanta, Zipperer, Lorberbaum & Beauvais, Eric Raymond Gotwalt, Savannah, for appellants. Ingles,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Joseph F. Bianco, District Judge: Plaintiffs Flexborrow LLC (“Flexbor-row”) and The Vault Auto Group, LLC (“Vault”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) bring this action against defendant TD Auto Finance LLC (“TDAF” or “defendant”), alleging (1) a substantive violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) and conspiracy to violate

Dismiss and Opinion Filed December 2, 2024 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00677-CV NOVO POINT, LLC AND QUANTEC, LLC, Appellants V. ELISSA KATZ, CHRISTOPHER A. PAYNE, AND SANDLER SIEGEL PLLC, Appellees On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 9, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ Nos. 3D21-2344 & 3D21-2437 Lower Tribunal No. 20-8460 ________________ Corey Shader, et al., Petitioners,

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Joy Flowers Conti, Chief United States District Judge I. Introduction This, action was brought by plaintiffs Trinity Industries, Inc. and Trinity Industries Railcar .Corporation (together with Trinity Industries, Inc., the “Trinity plaintiffs”) seeking contribution under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“C

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MORTGAGE CONNECT ) DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N23C-01-178 MAA CCLD ) GREEN INDUSTRIAL ) DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, ) ) Defendant.

BART F. VIRDEN, Judge 11Appellee G & C Generator, LLC (G & C), filed a complaint against appellant JMAC Farms, LLC (JMAC), and JMAC’s contractor, McReynolds Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McReynolds Water Systems (McRey-nolds), seeking to collect $66,200 for generators sold for the construction ■ of poultry houses on JMAC’s property and to foreclose on its materialmen’s lien. Default judgment was late

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1404 EMIGRANT RESIDENTIAL, LLC, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. LINDA S. PINTI, Defendant, Appellant, LESLEY R. PHILLIPS; ANY AND ALL OCCUPANTS, Defendants. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 03-OCT-2024 10:47 AM Dkt. 108 SO NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

OPINION BY JUDGE SIMPSON These consolidated appeals arising from an access dispute under the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL) 1 involve complex procedural and substantive questions, including the public nature of applications under the Medical Marijuana Act (Act).

ORFINGER, J. Melvin L. Stevens, Jr. appeals the trial court’s order denying his motions for relief from judgment.1 Stevens contends that the final judgment of foreclosure should be set aside because he was never served with the notice of issue or the order setting the trial. We agree and reverse. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, filed a foreclosure complaint against Stevens. For a ti

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiffs TDY Holdings, LLC and TDY Industries, LLC (collectively “TDY’) filed *1002a complaint against defendants the United States of America, the ■ United States Department of Defense, and the Secretary of Defense (collectively