Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Vaughn Scott Burch”
Brittany Scott Pye v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 1, 2012 BRITTANY SCOTT PYE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 17640 Stella Hargrove, Judge No. M2011-01633-CCA-R3-PC - Filed December 28, 2012 The Petitioner, Brittany Scott Pye, appeals from the Maury County
Smolka v. Statepublic domain
SEITZ, Justice: I. INTRODUCTION In August 2013, officers from New Castle County Police Operation Safe Streets searched a home at 5 Worthy Down Avenue in Bear, Delaware. During the search, the officers found Mark Smolka inside the house and a Taurus .38 special revolver in a closet. Smolka, who is a person prohibited from possessing a firearm, admitted at th
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00228-CR Ex parte Adam James Edmund Demirs FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 77,399-AA, THE HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Adam James Edmund Demirs was convicted of the state-jail-felony offense of criminal mischief and was sentenced to six mont
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. International Counsel Bureau and Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP (collectively “ICB”) bring this action against the United States Department of Defense pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (“FOIA”), seeking records pertaining to four individuals detained at Guantana
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. International Counsel Bureau and Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP (collectively “ICB”) bring this action against the United States Department of Defense (“Department”) pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (“FOIA”), seeking records pertaining to four individuals de
Selina Faith Parsons v. Statepublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00742-CR Selina Faith Parsons, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NO. B-17-0946-SB, THE HONORABLE BEN WOODWARD, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Workforce Development Cabinet v. Gainespublic domain
276 S.W.3d 789 (2008) WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CABINET, Department for Employment Services, Division of Unemployment Insurance, Appellant, v. Mary C. GAINES, Appellee. No. 2005-SC-000965-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. November 26, 2008. Rehearing Denied March 19, 2009. *790 Stewart Christopher Burch, Logan & Gai
Xavier Gutierrez v. the State of Texaspublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00627-CR Xavier Gutierrez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 19-2669-K277, THE HONORABLE STACEY MATHEWS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Long v. Slatonpublic domain
508 F.3d 576 (2007) Robert R. LONG, Kelly L. Long, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Bryan L. Long, deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jimmie Ray SLATON, Jr., Ronnie Willis, Defendants-Appellants. No. 06-14439. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. November 16, 2007. *577 Bart Gregory Harmon, Kendrick Emers
People v. Milespublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
ORDER TIMOTHY C. BATTEN, SR., District Judge. This case is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion [60] and DENIES Plaintiffs motion [51]. I. Background A. Factual Summary Jeffrey Grant wanted to purchase and develop 2.6 million dollars’ worth of re
Burch v. Hartepublic domain
Hosea, J. The essential facts of tbe controversy are as follows: The plaintiff claims the sum of $500 out of a sum of $1,000 in the hands of Harte, Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, by virtue of his office, being fees allowed the late Philip Kumler for services as referee in a certain suit. The claim is based on an assignment, in writing, from said Kumler dated September 28, 1899, and
State v. Meekspublic domain
262 S.W.3d 710 (2008) STATE of Tennessee v. Randy Lee MEEKS et al. No. M2006-01385-SC-R11-CO. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. May 28, 2008 Session Heard at Cookeville[1]. September 2, 2008. *713 Robert T. Carter and Eric J. Burch, Tullahoma, Tennessee, for the appellants, Randy Meeks and Erne
Payne v. Shelby County Commissionpublic domain
Timothy A. Payne and Frances L. Payne appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the Shelby County Commission and the Shelby County Planning Commission. We affirm. Procedural History On June 6, 2006, the Paynes sued B CC, LLC; Rick Burch; Burch Properties, LLC; the Shelby County Commission; and the Shelby County Planning Commission. Against the County Commission and the Planning Commission, the Paynes alleged claims of misrepresentation; suppression;
Finder v. John Marshall Law School, LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand’s Non-final Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) [79] on Defendant John Marshall Law School, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment [57]. I. BACKGROUND A. Facts1 Plaintiffs Kamin
Wayne Watson Enterprises, LLC v. City of Cambridgepublic domain
OPINION & ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter- comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment from Wayne Watson Enterprises, LLC, et al. (“Wayne Watson”) and the City of Cambridge, et al, (“the City”). As explained below, the Court GRANTS the City’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 26) on every claim but a supplemental state-law claim; DISM
Hamilton v. Municipal Court of Mesapublic domain
163 Ariz. 374 (1989) 788 P.2d 107 Lynn HAMILTON, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. The MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF MESA; the Honorable Harold Reeb, a judge thereof, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 88-285. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A. November 16, 1989. As Co