Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Vascular Access Centers, L.P.”
Gardner, W. v. Vascular Access Centers, LLCpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT WILLIAM WHITFIELD GARDNER, ANISH : No. 402 MAL 2019 SHAH, RASESH SHAH, PRAVIN SHAH, : VEENA SHAH, AND WARREN YU ON : BEHALF OF VASCULAR ACCESS : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from CENTERS, L.P., : the Order of the Superior Court : Respondents :
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00550-CV Norma LOPEZ, Appellant v. STAR VASCULAR, LLC d/b/a Star Vascular Access Center,
Riley v. Becton Dickinson Vascular Access, Inc.public domain
913 F.Supp. 879 (1995) Lynda RILEY, R.N., Plaintiff v. BECTON DICKINSON VASCULAR ACCESS, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 94-1482. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. December 29, 1995. *880 Herbert F. Kolsby, Kolsby, Gordon, Robin, Shore & Rothweiler, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiff. Suzanne Ilene Schill
Dialysis Access Center, LLC v. RMS Lifeline, Inc.public domain
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Before us once again are Dialysis Access Center (a Puerto Rico LLC) ("DAC"), 1 and RMS Lifeline, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) ("RMS"), the central players in a years-long and much-papered dispute. 2 Having previously been sent by this court to
Morrow v. Bard Access Systems, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER JONES, District Judge: Plaintiff Michael Morrow brought this action against defendant Bard Access Systems, Inc., in state court, alleging claims for age discrimination under ORS Chapter 659A, and common law claims for wrongful discharge. Defendant removed the action to this court based on diversity jurisdiction. The case is now before the court on defend
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Access Closure, Inc.public domain
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PLAGER. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. PLAGER, Circuit Judge. This is a patent case. Access Closure, Inc. (ACI), the defendant at trial, appeals from several rulings made by the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas in favor of St. Jude Medical, Inc. and St. Jude Medical Puerto Rico, LLC (co
OPINION Regent Health Care Center appeals the denial of its motion to dismiss pursuant to *Page 436 section 74.351 of the Texas Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act.1 For the following reasons, we remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion. I. BACKGROUND Spurgeon Wallace was an eighty-one-year-
Dialysis Access Center, LLC v. RMS Lifeline, Inc.public domain
638 F.3d 367 (2011) DIALYSIS ACCESS CENTER, LLC; Justo González-Trápaga; and his wife, Nancy Roig-Flores, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. RMS LIFELINE, INC., Defendant, Appellee. No. 10-1872. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard November 1, 2010. Decided March 30, 2011. *370 Juan Ramón Rivas-Rivera, fo
This is a medical-malpractice case involving multiple issues. Shannon McCoy (Shannon) was thirty-seven weeks pregnant and under the prenatal obstetrical care of Dr. Debra Gunn, an obstetrician and gynecologist (ob/gyn) associated with Obstetrical and Gynecological Associates, P.A. (OGA). Shannon presented herself to the hospital with severe abdominal pain, where doctors determined that she had suffered placental abruption and that
698 F.Supp.2d 436 (2010) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF the OFFICE OF VERMONT HEALTH ACCESS o/b/o Francis CAREY, Plaintiff, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services,[1] Defendant. Case No. 2:08-CV-168. United States District Court, D. Vermont. March 15, 2010. *438 Jacob S. Spe
SECOND DIVISION BARNES, P. J., BOGGS and RICKMAN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules October 28
Plaintiff Mariela Garcia Lopez ("Plaintiff") has brought a multi-count product liability action. In her First Amended Complaint (the"Complaint"), Plaintiff asserts personal injury claims against the designers, manufacturers and sell_ers of a medical device that failed during her hysterectomy surgery. Presented for decision is the Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) M tion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim.
ALAN E. NORRIS, J, delivered the opinion of the court, in which GILMAN, J., joined. MERRITT, J. (pp. 1032-33), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff David M. Sokol, M.D., brought federal antitrust and state law claims against defendants Akron General Medical Center (“Akron General”), Daniel P. Guy-ton, M.D., Michael A. Oddi, M.D., and Cardio-Thoracic and Vascula
Matter of DeNobile v. Panettapublic domain
Matter of DeNobile v Panetta (2018 NY Slip Op 07722) Matter of DeNobile v Panetta 2018 NY Slip Op 07722 Decided on November 14, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
Gallagher v. Mercy Med. Ctr., Inc.public domain
Opinion by Greene, J. When multiple tortfeasors contribute to a plaintiff's injuries, the plaintiff may choose how to structure his or her litigation against one or all tortfeasors in pursuit of compensation for those injuries. The law, however, will permit the plaintiff to obtain only one full satisfaction of his or her injuries. Such satisfaction will preclude the plaintiff from pur
Sandi D. Jackson v. HCA Health Services of Tennessee, Inc. d/b/a Centennial Medical Centerpublic domain
OPINION FRANK G. CLEMENT, JR., J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which RICHARD H. DINKINS, J., and ROBERT W. WEDEMEYER, SP. J., joined. This appeal arises from the dismissal of a medical malpractice action due to the plaintiff’s failure to provide a certificate of good faith. All defendants fi
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 1, 2020. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00913-CV NORMA LOPEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ALFONSO LOPEZ, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF ALFONSO LOPEZ, Appellant V. BRIAN CALLAHAN, M.D., Appellee
Central Kansas Medical Center v. Hatesohlpublic domain
Per Curiam: This case arises from a contract dispute between Dr. Stanley Hatesohl, a family medicine doctor, and his former employer, Central Kansas Medical Center (CKMC), d/b/a St. Rose Ambulatory and Surgery Center (St. Rose). CKMC is a nonprofit general corporation that is licensed to operate an ambulatory surgical center (ASC). CKMC contracted with Dr. Hatesohl to provide family medicine services at St. Rose for two years. This
Pertuit v. Tenant Louisiana Health Systemspublic domain
MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge. | ,The plaintiffs appeal the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendants, the State of • Louisiana, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (collectively “LSU Health Sciences”) and J. Philip Boudreaux, M.D. (“Dr. Boudreaux”), dismissing their medical malpractice claim with prejudice. Af*934ter reviewing t
GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: Relator Kevin Colquitt lost the qui tam war against his former employer Abbott Laboratories in three battles. He pursued three False Claims Act theories based on claims submitted to Medicare by medical providers engaged in the “off-label” use of Abbott’s medical stents. A false inducement claim and a claim predicated on false certi