Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Vara v. Morris”
Andrew Vara v. Steven McDonaldpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0060p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: STEVEN P. MCDONALD, │
United States v. Morrispublic domain
Opinion of the Court Per Curiam : The accused pleaded guilty before a Navy special court-martial to the offenses of absence without leave and missing movement, in violation of Ar-tides 86 and 87 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886 and 887, respectively. The staff legal officer in the post-trial review, after corn-menting upon the offenses charged,
Morris v. Moorepublic domain
This suit was filed in the district court of Brazoria county, Tex., by Mrs. Mila Morris, Mrs. Polly Carleton, Mrs. Pattie Rector and her husband, E. L. Rector, and Allen Townes, as heirs of R. J. Townes, deceased, on the 18th day of May, 1917, against E. R. Moore, T. L. Smith, and others, to recover a strip of land 200 varas in width and 5,000 varas in length, a part of the A. Darst league in Brazoria county, and being the same awarded to A. Darst, Jr., in the partition of the estate of his f
Mars v. Morrispublic domain
Appellant's suit against appellee was to try the title to 43 32-100 acres of the Joshua B. Hill survey in Hopkins County. His petition, in the form usual in such suits, was filed in the District Court of Hopkins County on January 8, 1906. Appellee answered by a general demurrer, a general denial, a plea of not guilty, a plea setting up the statute of limitations of five years, and a suggestion that he had in good faith made permanent and valuable improvements on the land. By a supplemental pe
Harrell v. Morrispublic domain
This suit was brought by the appellee against the appellant in the district court of Lampasas county to recover 25 acres of land, the plaintiff claiming under the James Easley, and the defendant under the Daniel Stanley original surveys. The question tried was as to the true boundary between these two surveys. The case was tried by the judge, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. The Stanley survey was made in 1840, and the Easley not earlier than 1844. The Stanley is south line of the
Woods v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.public domain
635 F.Supp.2d 530 (2009) Mary Emma WOODS, Plaintiff v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, and Philip Morris USA, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 5:07-cv-130 (DCB) (JMR). United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Western Division. June 18, 2009. *532 Carroll Edward Rhodes, Law Offic
Eyebobs, LLC v. Snap, Inc.public domain
ORDER Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge This is a trademark-infringement action brought by plaintiff Eyebobs, LLC (“Eye-bobs”1) against defendant Snap, Inc. (“Snap”). Eyebobs designs and sells reading glasses, including reading sunglasses. Eyebobs owns an incontestable registered trademark (Registration No. 3484578) protecting a mark consisting of an oval, up
McDaniel v. Statepublic domain
24 So.3d 654 (2009) Harold McDANIEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D08-4144. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. December 11, 2009. *655 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and J.L. Perez, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallah
In Re Level Propane Gases, Inc.public domain
297 B.R. 503 (2003) In re LEVEL PROPANE GASES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 02-16172. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. July 11, 2003. *504 Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, Daniel A. DeMarco, David M. Neumann, Dov Frankel, H. Jeffrey Schwartz, Jeremy Campana, Cleveland, OH, John A. Gleason, Benesch, Fr
Jane Ann Walker Alvizo v. Andy Walkerpublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-20-00080-CV JANE ANN WALKER ALVIZO, Appellant V. ANDY WALKER, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law Fannin County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2020-7713 Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Opinion by Justice Stevens
Ronwin v. Bayer Corp.public domain
DAVIS, District Judge. These matters are before the Court upon the Plaintiffs’ motions for relief from parts 1(A) and 1(B) of PTO No. 114, which require that Plaintiffs submit either a case-specific expert report from a medical expert attesting that Baycol caused the plaintiff injury or a letter and supporting documents, followed by a case-specific expert report, that identifies and highlights the medical records, samples
Blanchette v. Devospublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TAMARA BLANCHETTE, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 19-1775 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 10, 12, 15
Case: 22-1765 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 08/24/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VOLVO PENTA OF THE AMERICAS, LLC, Appellant v. BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, Appellee KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Case: 22-1765 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 08/24/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VOLVO PENTA OF THE AMERICAS, LLC, Appellant v. BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, Appellee KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Hayden v. Koonspublic domain
25-498-cv Hayden v. Koons UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2025 (Argued: December 10, 2025 Decided: July 21, 2026) Docket No. 25-498-cv MICHAEL A. HAYDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
(2008) HAZEL PARK RACING ASSOCIATION, INC., a Michigan corporation, Northville Racing Corporation, a Michigan corporation, and Northville Downs Halfmile Cycle Race Corporation, a Michigan corporation, Plaintiffs, v. TRUSTEES OF THE SEIU NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, Defendant. No. 07-11578. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 28, 2008.
RDG PARTNERSHIP v. Longpublic domain
350 S.W.3d 262 (2011) RDG PARTNERSHIP, Gene Jupe, and Shirley Jupe, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. George LONG, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. 04-10-00366-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. June 22, 2011. Rehearing Overruled September 7, 2011. *265 Adam Poncio, Poncio Law Office, P.C., Ronald J. Shaw, Ron
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 27, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D16-2851 Lower Tribunal No. 14-26236 ________________ Miami-Dade Expressway Authority and Javier Rodrig
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 27, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D16-2851 Lower Tribunal No. 14-26236 ________________ Miami-Dade Expressway Authority and Javier Rodrig
In re Marriage of Likarpublic domain
2024 IL App (3d) 240103 Opinion filed March 13, 2024 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT 2024 In re MARRIAGE OF