Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Vanity Christine Williams”
Basis International Ltd. v. Research in Motion Ltd.public domain
827 F.Supp.2d 1302 (2011) BASIS INTERNATIONAL LTD., Plaintiff, v. RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED and Research in Motion Corporation, Defendants. Civil No. 11-00953-WJ-ACT. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. December 6, 2011. *1304 Christine Lebron-Dykeman, Jeffrey D. Harty, McKee, Vorhees & Sease, Des Moines, IA, Elizab
State v. Marshallpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Marshall, 2022-Ohio-1533.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WD-21-043 Appellee Trial Court No. 2020CR0210 v. Charles Marshall, J. DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant
Commonwealth v. Erazopublic domain
Kaplan, Mitchell H., J. A Suffolk County grand jury returned an indictment against the defendant, Jaime Erazo, for trafficking in cocaine in excess of 100 grams. The case is before the court on the defendant’s motion to suppress all evidence that was seized from him on January 5, 2010, as well as any statements that he made following the seizure. The defendant contends that this evidence was seized in violation of rights afford
923 F.Supp. 433 (1996) BARON PHILIPPE de ROTHSCHILD, S.A.; Societte Civile Chateau Lafite Rothschild; Guy de Rothschild; Eric de Rothschild; and Philippine de Rothschild, Plaintiffs, v. PARAMOUNT DISTILLERS, INC.; Paramount Brands, Inc.; Mar-Inter S.A.R.L.; and Roger L. Myers and Chantal Myers, d/b/a Monopoles Alfred Rothschild and Les Caves M.A.R., Defendants. No. 87 Civ. 6820 (SHS). United States Dis
State v. Wrightpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Wright, 2022-Ohio-1537.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-20-1206 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0201902202 v. Justin Wright DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant
Rossi v. Indiana County Tax Claim Bureaupublic domain
Opinion by Judge Doyle, George W. Rossi, William B. Kania, and Jack Stanley (Appellants) appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of. Indiana County which dismissed Appellants ’ exceptions and objections to a tax claim sale of two: parcels of property.located in Pine Township. The properties in question were purchased in 1978 by George W. Rossi and Robert A. Hoover.1
People v. Chapmanpublic domain
633 N.E.2d 718 (1992) 262 Ill. App.3d 439 198 Ill.Dec. 877 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-90-3014. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. December 11, 1992. *720 Michael J. Pelletier, Depu
United States v. Ponds, Navronpublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS. ROGERS, Circuit Judge. This appeal challenges the government’s use of documents produced by Navron Ponds pursuant to a grant of immunity under 18 U.S.C. § 6002. Ponds’ appeal of his convictions for tax evasion and fraud requires the court to address the breadth of that immunity for an act of production
Compassion In Dying v. State Of Washingtonpublic domain
85 F.3d 1440 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4162 COMPASSION IN DYING, a Washington nonprofit corporation;Jane Roe; John Doe; James Poe; HaroldGlucksberg, M.D., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.STATE OF WASHINGTON; Christine Gregoire, Attorney Generalof Washington, Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-35534. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.
People v. Adamcykpublic domain
631 N.E.2d 407 (1994) 259 Ill.App.3d 670 197 Ill.Dec. 404 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert J. ADAMCYK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2-92-1072. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. March 25, 1994. *408 Schlesinger & Krasny, Gregory J. Schles
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VERITION PARTNERS MASTER FUND ) LTD. and VERITION MULTI-STRATEGY ) MASTER FUND LTD., ) ) Petitioners, ) v. ) C.A. No. 11448-VCL ) ARUBA NETWORKS, INC., )
Gray v. Citigroup Inc.public domain
STRAUB, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: The August 2007 collapse of the $2 trillion subprime1 mortgage market unleashed “a global contagion,”2 the virulence of which is well demonstrated by plaintiffs’ allegations in this case. Plaintiffs are current and former employees of Cit
Compassion in Dying v. Washingtonpublic domain
AMENDED ORDER An active judge sua sponte requested that the full court rehear this case en bane. The request failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges. The request is rejected. O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, joined by TROTT and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, dissenting from order rejecting request for rehearing en banc by the full court: By
EFiled: May 21 2018 08:00AM EDT Transaction ID 62037960 Case No. 11448-VCL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VERITION PARTNERS MASTER FUND ) LTD. and VERITION MULTI-STRATEGY ) MASTER FUND LTD., ) )
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VERITION PARTNERS MASTER FUND ) LTD. and VERITION MULTI-STRATEGY ) MASTER FUND LTD., ) ) Petitioners, ) v. ) C.A. No. 11448-VCL ) ARUBA NETWORKS, INC., )
Flanigan v. General Electric Co.public domain
BACKGROUND McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge: The demise of the Soviet Union in the early 1990’s had a direct impact upon the *82defense industry in the United States. As the industry reshaped itself, the Martin Marietta Corporation (now Lockheed Martin or “Lockheed”) acquired the General Electric Company’s (“GE’s”) aerospace division in a bewilderingly com
State v. Urcinolipublic domain
729 A.2d 507 (1999) STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Louis P. URCINOLI, Defendant-Appellant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted April 12, 1999. Decided June 2, 1999. *509 Ivelisse Torres, Public Defender, for defendant-appellant (Michael C. Kazer, Designated Counsel, on the brief). Pet
Omega S.A. v. Omega Engineering, Inc.public domain
228 F.Supp.2d 112 (2002) OMEGA S.A. v. OMEGA ENGINEERING, INC. Omega Press, Inc., and Omega Scientific, Inc. No. 3:00CV1848 (JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. October 18, 2002. *113 Arthur T. Fattibene, Paul A. Fattibene, Southport, CT, Jess M. Collen, James R. *114 Hastings,
United States v. Ruggieropublic domain
OAKES, Circuit Judge: Ten defendants, following a declaration of mistrial, appeal from the denial of their motion to bar a retrial on double jeopardy grounds. The defendants — Angelo Rug-giero, Gene Gotti, John Carneglia, Edward Lino, Mark Reiter, Joseph LoPresti, Anthony Moscatiello, Oscar Ansourian, Anthony Gurino, and Cesar Gurino — were tried in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Mark A.
Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc.public domain
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is a trademark infringement case between two global fashion compa*215nies. On May 6, 2009, Gucci America, Inc. (“Gucci”) filed a complaint against Guess?, Inc. (“Guess”), Marc Fisher Footwear LLC (“MFF”), the Max Leather Group/Cipri