Cases

Stoll, Circuit Judge. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. appeals the district court's decision holding the claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,808,737 ineligible under

Case: 18-1976 Document: 187 Page: 1 Filed: 08/05/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM (CORK) LIMITED, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2018-1976, 2018-2023 ________

Case: 18-1976 Document: 111 Page: 1 Filed: 10/02/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM (CORK) LIMITED, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2018-1976, 2018-2023 _______

In the United States Court of Federal Claims FOR PUBLICATION No. 23-629C (Filed: January 22, 2025) ) VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, et al., Civil Action No. 23-280 (TSC) Defendants, and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Intervenor-Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Vanda Pharm

Dissenting opinion filed by Chief Judge Prost. Lourie, Circuit Judge. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Limited and West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp. (collectively, "West-Ward") appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding, after a bench trial, claims 1-9, 11-13, and 16 ("the asserted claims") of U.S. Patent 8,586,610 ("the '610 patent") infringed and not inv

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Plaintiff-Appellee AVENTISUB LLC, Plaintiff v. WEST-WARD PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, WEST-WARD PHARMACEUTICALS CORP., Defendants-Appellants ______________________ 2016-2707, 2016-2708

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 23-cv-2812 (CRC) FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Vanda”) developed, manufactures, and sells the

Case: 23-1169 Document: 43 Page: 1 Filed: 06/25/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AMARIN PHARMA, INC., AMARIN PHARMACEUTICALS IRELAND LIMITED, MOCHIDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC., HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS PLC, Defendants-Appellees HEALTH NET LLC,

Case: 22-2153 Document: 71 Page: 1 Filed: 04/11/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BAUSCH HEALTH IRELAND LTD., ALFASIGMA S.P.A., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. NORWICH PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2022

Case: 22-2153 Document: 71 Page: 1 Filed: 04/11/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BAUSCH HEALTH IRELAND LTD., ALFASIGMA S.P.A., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. NORWICH PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2022

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NORWICH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-091 v. (BAH) Judge Beryl A. Howell ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR., in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human FILED UNDER SEAL Services, et al.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NORWICH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff, Vv. Civil Action No. 23-1611 (RDM) XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, etal, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Battles over the entry of generic drugs to market are often hard fought, particularly in cases involving brand-named drugs with annual sales that substantially exceed $1 billion. See Dkt. 1 at 11 (Compl. § 41). This is a case in point. Defendant-Intervenor Salix Pha

Case: 24-1177 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 08/11/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ POWERBLOCK HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. IFIT, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2024-1177 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Di

Case: 22-1595 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 12/22/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GENENTECH, INC., INTERMUNE, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. SANDOZ INC., LEK PHARMACEUTICALS, D.D., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2022-1595 ______________________ Appeal from the Uni

Case: 19-1419 Document: 64 Page: 1 Filed: 08/03/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ILLUMINA, INC., SEQUENOM, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC., ROCHE SEQUENCING SOLUTIONS, INC., ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________

Case: 19-1419 Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 03/17/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ILLUMINA, INC., SEQUENOM, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC., ROCHE SEQUENCING SOLUTIONS, INC., ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 20

Opinion dissenting in part filed by Chief Judge PROST. Taranto, Circuit Judge. Dr. Mark Barry brought this action against Medtronic, Inc., alleging that Medtronic induced surgeons to infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 7,670,358 and 8,361,121, which Dr. Barry owns and which name him as the sole inventor. The jury found infringement of method claims 4 and 5 of the '358 patent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. Case No. 1:22-mc-54 (RJL/GMH) MATCH GROUP, INC., Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In March 2020, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Petitioner”)

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ HZNP MEDICINES LLC, HORIZON PHARMA USA, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES UT, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2017-2149, 2017-2152, 2017-2153, 2017-2202, 2017-2203, 2017-2206 ______________________ Appeals from the U