Cases

280 Wis.2d 253 (2005) 2005 WI App 54 694 N.W.2d 452 IN RE the MARRIAGE OF: Larry M. WALN, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Barbara J. WALN, Respondent-Appellant. No. 04-1271-FT. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs December 10, 2004. Decided February 23, 2005. On behalf of the respondent-appella

763 N.W.2d 554 (2008) 2008 WI App 190 Lois E. NISCHKE and Donald L. Nischke, Plaintiffs-Joint-Appellants[†] v. AETNA HEALTH PLANS, a/k/a Aetna Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Joint-Appellant[†] Partners Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Respondent, Victor A. Barron, Michelle F. Garfield, 1st Auto & Casualty Insurance Company and American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants.

177 Wis.2d 485 (1993) 501 N.W.2d 452 IN the MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST Frederick N. TROWBRIDGE, Attorney at Law. No. 92-0711-D. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs May 26, 1993. Decided June 24, 1993. For the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility there was briefs by Richard P. Mozinski, Man

REYNOLDS, Chief Judge. This is a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for damages resulting from the allegedly wrongful denial of a building permit. On April 9, 1986, the Court asked the parties to brief the question of the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction. Having considered the briefs submitted by the parties and having considered the question, the Court finds that it lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of this dispute and

CHIEF JUSTICE HEFFERNAN. This is a review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals, which affirmed the decision of the circuit court for Brown county, William J. Duffy, circuit judge, that the Department of Health and Social Services was authorized by statute to promulgate a rule that takes the income of non-liable family members into consideration in determining the liable family member's ability to pay for social serv

390 N.E.2d 163 (1979) In the matter of Robert F. Craven. No. 278S32. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 30, 1979. Vance M. Waggoner, Rushville, for appellant. Sheldon A. Breskow, Ind. Supreme Court, Disciplinary Comm., Indianapolis, for appellee. DISCIPLINARY ACTION PER CURIAM. This proceeding is before the Court on an one-count verified com

464 N.E.2d 347 (1984) Mae ASH, Clara Foreman, Kenneth Matney, Philip Mundy, Clifford Pendergrass, and Dwight Wilson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RUSH COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, Defendants-Appellees, Glenwood Terminal, Inc., Intervening Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-1282A363. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. June 11, 1984. Rehearing Denied July 10, 19

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Bettie Farr served as the clerk of the Village of Howard, Wisconsin, between 1980 and 1989, adding the duties of treasurer in 1986 and economic development coordinator in 1987. She served at the pleasure of the Village’s board of trustees. In May 1989 Eugene Gruber and Roger Sachs, two of the trustees, procured her dismissal from all three posts. The tr

313 N.E.2d 535 (1974) Leon JOHNSON and Arthur B. Clough, Also Known As Frank L. Farlow, Appellants (Defendants below), v. The STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 272S15. Supreme Court of Indiana. July 9, 1974. Rehearing Denied August 20, 1974. Vance M. Waggoner, Rushville, for appellants. Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., Darrel K

315 N.E.2d 431 (1974) SEASTROM, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants, v. AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 1-173A14. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. August 21, 1974. Rehearing Denied September 24, 1974. *432 J.B. King, Theodore R. Boehm, Rory O'Bryan, Indianapolis, for defendants-a

295 N.E.2d 613 (1973) Jane Frances DICKENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee. No. 1270S295. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 3, 1973. *615 Vance M. Waggoner, Rushville, for appellant. Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., A. Frank Gleaves, III, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee. HUNTER, Justice. This is an appea

Eugene Monroe Vance brought this suit in the District Court against the State Board of Hairdressers and Cosmetologists to set aside an order of the Board revoking plaintiff's license to practice and instruct in hairdressing and cosmetology. Both plaintiff and defendant filed motions for summary judgment. The defendant's motion was granted and judgment was entered upholding the defendant's administrative order revoking the cosmetology licenses held by plaintiff. Section 10(c) of

306 N.E.2d 125 (1974) SEASTROM, INC., et al., Appellants, v. AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Appellee. No. 1173A14. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. January 30, 1974. *126 J.B. King, Theodore R. Boehm, Rory O'Bryan, Baker & Daniels, Indianapolis, for appellants. Vance M. Waggoner, Rushville, Arch N. Bobbitt,

485 S.W.2d 505 (1972) Bernard T. PERRY, Appellant, v. ERNEST R. HAMILTON ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellee. ERNEST R. HAMILTON ASSOCIATES, INC., Cross-Appellant, v. Bernard T. PERRY, Cross-Appellee. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. September 22, 1972. *506 J. H. Highfield, Louisville, Vance M. Waggoner, Rushville, Ind., for appellant and cross-

234 Ind. 650 (1955) 130 N.E.2d 460 STATE OF INDIANA ON THE RELATION OF WOLFAL ETC. v. RUSH CIRCUIT COURT, BARGER, SPECIAL JUDGE. No. 29,347. Supreme Court of Indiana. Filed December 15, 1955. Vance M. Waggoner, of Rushville, for relator. ARTERBURN, J. This is an original action asking for a writ of prohibition out of this

Buchanan, J. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS — This is an appeal from an adverse decision by the trial court against plaintiffs-appellants, W. H. and Lorraine Hiatt (Hiatt) on their Complaint for Damages and Specific Performance of two agreements for the sale and repurchase (resale) of corporate stock between Hiatt and defendantsappellees, Eugene H. Yergin, Beatrice R. Yergin, John D. Yergin, Betty L. Yergin (Yergin), and Henry

394 F.Supp. 1124 (1975) Ronald L. DODGE et al., Plaintiffs, v. FIRST WISCONSIN TRUST COMPANY, N. E. Isaacson & Associates, Incorporated and Shawano County Board, Defendants. No. 74-C-476. United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin. May 16, 1975. *1125 Ronald L. Dodge, pro se, for all tribes. Joseph F. Preloznik, Mad

68 Wis.2d 332 (1975) 228 N. W. 2d 664 VAN CAMP and wife, for themselves and for the benefit of all other persons whom they represent, Respondents, v. MENOMINEE ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant.[*] No. 442. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Argued April 7, 1975. Decided May 6, 1975. *334 F

240 Wis.2d 438 (2000) 2001 WI App 20 623 N.W.2d 195 Everett CARLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OCONTO COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS, Respondent-Respondent, Barbara SMITH, Intervenor-Respondent-Respondent. No. 00-1788. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs November 13, 2000. Decided December 5, 2000.

DECISION AND ORDER GRIESBACH, District Judge. Plaintiff fried this declaratory judgment action on October 2, 2002, seeking a declaration that the restrictive covenants contained in a franchise agreement entered into by both plaintiff and defendant are enforceable under Wisconsin law. More to the point, H & R Block wants to prevent Leslie Vorpahl from competing in the tax preparation market within 45 m