⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Van Fleet v. Wright”

District Court, S.D. Texas · 2018-03-13 · Published · cited 8× · 313 F. Supp. 3d 822
Gray H. Miller, United States District Judge *830Pending before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. ("WMT"). Dkt. 27. Having considered the motion, response, reply, record evidence, and applicable law, the court is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND
District Court, S.D. New York · 1985-10-30 · Published · cited 1× · 108 F.R.D. 116; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14362
OPINION MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge: Plaintiff Flexi-Van Leasing Incorporated (“Flexi-Van”) filed suit in the Southern District of New York seeking to enforce a written guarantee of payment for maritime containers allegedly executed by defendant Gulf Fleet Marine Corporation (“Gulf Fleet”). Subject-matter jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. Defendant Gulf Fleet was served with pro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918-06-10 · Published · cited 2× · 252 F. 100; 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2045; 164 C.C.A. 212
GILBERT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). [1] The order of March 11, 1918, is sought to be reviewed here by writ of error. Under the provisions of Act Sept. 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat, 726, the.cause will be deemed to be in this court by appeal, since the contempt charged is a civil contempt, arising in connection with a suit in equity for disobedience of an order made to preserve and enfor
District Court, E.D. Texas · 1998-03-23 · Published · cited 11× · 998 F. Supp. 729; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3699; 1998 WL 136097
998 F.Supp. 729 (1998) Chester SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. SEAL FLEET, INC., Southern States Offshore, Inc., and Sealcraft Operators, Inc., Defendants. No. 1:97-CV-529. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. March 23, 1998. *730 *731 Steven Carl Barkley, Steven C. Barkley, Bea
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013-06-19 · Published · cited 9× · 116 So. 3d 530; 2013 WL 3014121; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9636
GROSS, J. Between 2008 and 2009, Broward County redesigned a government program to realize over $11 million in savings for taxpayers. For this exercise of fiscal respon*532sibility, the County was sued by the appellants, Handi-Van, Inc., and Village Car Service, Inc., two providers under the scrapped program, whose bids were too high for participation in the revamped
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015-05-15 · Published · cited 1× · 105 F. Supp. 3d 531; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64247; 2015 WL 2357430
*534 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. Plaintiff Robert Allan Wright brings suit against Defendant Zacky & Sons Poultry, LLC (“Zacky”) for breach of an employment contract. Before the court is Zacky’s motion to dismiss or transfer for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue pursuant to F
Fox v. Van Fleetpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914-11-11 · Published · cited 0× · 160 Ky. 796; 1914 Ky. LEXIS 545; 170 S.W. 185
Opinion of the Court by Judge Miller Affirming. Fielding Watts, of Clark County, the father of Lilly D. Fox, died testate in 1894. The clauses of his will which are material to this litigation, read as follows: “3. I have kept my children equal, and desire that in the distribution of my estate, each shall have an equal portion with the limitations and conditions hereinafter na
District Court, W.D. New York · 2006-08-22 · Published · cited 3× · 445 F. Supp. 2d 314; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59148; 2006 WL 2435589
445 F.Supp.2d 314 (2006) Kenneth WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Defendant. Gary Thompson, Plaintiff, v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant. Nos. 04-CV-6332L, 04-CV-6333L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. August 22, 2006. *315 Van Henri White, Law Office Of Van White, Rochester, NY, for Plaintif
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995-01-26 · Published · cited 0×
USCA1 Opinion January 27, 1995 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT __________________ No. 94-1490 FLEET NATIONAL BANK,
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006-05-17 · Published · cited 3× · 235 F.R.D. 537; 70 Fed. R. Serv. 248; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32564; 2006 WL 1455619
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW [Doc. No. 551], MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL [Doc. No. 552], AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON/INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S WITHDRAWN RECKLESSNESS CLAIM [Doc. No. 549] HALL, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, Shawn Pouliot (“Pouliot”), was a truck driver who was severely injured while unloading freight from a truck owned by d
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995-01-26 · Published · cited 35× · 45 F.3d 546; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1487; 1995 WL 23400
BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge. In this appeal, appellants Anchor Media Television, Inc. (“Anchor”), and KOVR-TV of Delaware, Inc. (“KÓVR”), contend that the district court committed several legal and discretionary errors in the course of two trials of their claims of fraud and breach of contract against appellees Narragansett Capital, Inc. (“Narragansett”), KOVR’s former owner, a
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996-04-09 · Published · cited 15× · 926 F. Supp. 226; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7319; 1996 WL 254306
926 F.Supp. 226 (1996) FLEET NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. H & D ENTERTAINMENT, INC. (f/k/a Dover Broadcasting, Inc.) and H & D Management, Inc., as general partner of each of H & D Broadcasting Limited Partnership, H & D Media Limited Partnership, H & D Radio Limited Partnership, and H & D Wireless Limited Partnership, Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs, PNC Bank, Ohio, N.A., Charles E. G
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986-06-11 · Published · cited 5× · 637 F. Supp. 742; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24355
637 F.Supp. 742 (1986) FLEET AEROSPACE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Mark HOLDERMAN, Acting Commissioner and Chief of Securities for Division of Commerce; Kenneth Cox, Director of Commerce, Department of Commerce; Aeronca, Inc.; and The State of Ohio, Defendants. No. C-2-86-0556. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, E.D. June 11, 1986.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986-12-02 · Published · cited 53× · 806 F.2d 1340; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34369
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. From approximately 1975 to 1983, appellant, Fleet Wallace Maull, took part in an extensive narcotics enterprise to import and distribute large quantities of cocaine. Maull and his partner, Michael Kendrick, purchased cocaine in Santa Cruz, Bolivia, and then smuggled it into the United States by concealing t
District Court, District of Columbia · 1997-04-16 · Published · cited 21× · 963 F. Supp. 7; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5428; 1997 WL 198112
963 F.Supp. 7 (1997) Patricia A. WRIGHT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civil Action No. 95-0274-LFO. United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 16, 1997. *8 *9 Mark R. Thompson, Foret & Thompson, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. Marina Utg
Van Fleet v. Heylerpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1942-05-05 · Published · cited 32× · 51 Cal. App. 2d 719; 125 P.2d 586; 1942 Cal. App. LEXIS 746
51 Cal.App.2d 719 (1942) HARRY VAN FLEET et al., Appellants, v. DAVID B. HEYLER, Respondent. Civ. No. 12771. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three. May 5, 1942. Haight, Trippet & Syvertson, Arthur L. Syvertson, and Randolph L. Shinn for Appellants. Tripp, Penney & Callaway, Hulen C. Callaway and D. Paul White for Respondent. <
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994-09-28 · Published · cited 4× · 172 B.R. 777; 31 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 280; 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 1593; 1994 WL 560434
172 B.R. 777 (1994) In re David James ROTH, Debtor. FLEET FACTORS CORP., by its AMBASSADOR FACTORS DIVISION, Plaintiff, v. David James ROTH, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 92-B-21192 (JJC). Adv. No. 92-5324A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. September 28, 1994. *778 Derman & Derman by Herbert B. Derman, New York
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2000-05-09 · Published · cited 1× · 99 F. Supp. 2d 1008; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7861; 2000 WL 720005
99 F.Supp.2d 1008 (2000) Sherman JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. DAGGETT, VAN DOVER, DONOVAN & PERRY, PLLC, and Jesse B. Daggett, Defendants. No. 4:99CV00417 WRW. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Little Rock Division. May 9, 2000. *1009 *1010 Philip M. Wilson, Little Rock, AR, Roy C. Dr
California Court of Appeal · 1949-04-25 · Published · cited 9× · 91 Cal. App. 2d 411; 205 P.2d 32; 1949 Cal. App. LEXIS 1243
Plaintiff sued on five promissory notes, four of which were executed in the name of "Poverty Hill Mine, by A.J. Oyster," one signed by "A.J. Oyster." All notes were made payable to plaintiff without restrictions. The trial was had without a jury and judgment went for defendant. In 1938, a limited partnership called Poverty Hill Mine was formed by plaintiff, defendant and one C.C. Trowbridge, Jr. The defendant was the only general partner. In 1941, a partnership named Poverty Hi
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991-12-10 · Published · cited 4× · 794 F. Supp. 844; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20475; 1991 WL 348395
794 F.Supp. 844 (1991) WRIGHT-MOORE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. RICOH CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. No. F 86-35. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. December 10, 1991. *845 *846 Philip A. Whistler, Fred R. Biesecker, Ice Miller Donadio & Ryan, Indianapolis, Ind.,