Cases

MICHEL, Circuit Judge. Van Dale Industries (Van Dale) appeals the April 1, 1994 decision of the Court of International Trade, slip opinion 94-54, granting summary judgment affirming the United States Customs Service classification under subheading 6109.10.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) of merchandise imported by Van Dale. Because Van Dale has n

Opinion DiCarlo, Chief Judge: Plaintiff, Van Dale Industries, is the importer of record for the subject merchandise — women’s or girls’ underwear tops that cover the chest area and do not extend past the midriff of the wearer. The United States Customs Service classified the merchandise under Subheading 6109.10.00, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which applies to “T-shirts, s

709 F.Supp.2d 1254 (2009) SIERRA CLUB, Natural Resources Defense Council, and National Parks Conservation Association, Plaintiffs, v. Lt. Gen. Robert L. VAN ANTWERP, Chief of Engineers, United States Army Corps of Engineers, and H. Dale Hall, Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Defendants, Miami-Dade Limestone Products Association, Inc., Vecellio & Grogan, Inc., Tarmac America LLC, Florida Rock Industries, Inc., Sawgrass Ro

PHASE II FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW William E. Smith, Chief Judge I. Introduction Dioxip and other toxic chemical pollution at the Centredale Manor Restoration Project Superfund Site (“Centredale Site” or “Site”) in North Providence, Rhode Island, has led to going on ten years of litigation over which parties are responsible and what is the appropriate remedy. The Court divided t

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER LESLEY WELLS, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on defendants SAP and SAP AG’s (collective*790ly, “SAP”) objections to United States Magistrate Judge Greg White’s recommendation that SAP’s motion for summary judgment be denied. (Doc. 187). Also before the Court are defendants LSi-Low-ery S

144 P.3d 1279 (2006) Audie DRAGON and John Howard, for themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. VANGUARD INDUSTRIES, INC., Vanguard Piping Systems, Inc., and Vanguard Plastics, Inc., Appellees. No. 94,877. Supreme Court of Kansas. October 27, 2006. *1281 Rex A. Sharp, of Gunderson, Sharp & Walke, L.L.P., o

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-183L (Filed: March 13, 2018)* *Opinion originally filed under seal on February 23, 2018 ) IDEKER FARMS, INC., et al., ) ) Fifth Amendment Taking; Missouri Plaintiffs, ) River; Flooding; Liability; Causation;

756 F.Supp. 1191 (1991) FRIEBURG FARM EQUIPMENT, INC., Frieburg Farm Equipment, Harold R. Frieburg, Charles Frieburg and Jerome Koosman, Plaintiffs, v. VAN DALE, INC., Defendant. No. 89-C-0666-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. February 15, 1991. H. Dale Peterson, Madison, Wis., for plaintiffs. Ted Waskowski, Madison, Wis., for defendant.

378 F.Supp.2d 682 (2005) ZAUDERER ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. C & J INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant. C.A. No. 2:03-1864-23. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. July 11, 2005. David Wolf, Savage and Savage, Charleston, SC, Barbara H. Kramer, Kramer and Kramer, Ann Arbor, MI, Mitchell A. Kramer, Kramer and Kramer, Rydal, PA, for P

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Southwestern Energy Co. disposed of fracking waste near the property of R. Dale and Kari B. Stroud after they refused to lease their property to SWE. The Strouds sued, claiming SWE’s waste migrated onto their property. The district court granted SWE’s motion for summary judgment based on the insufficiency of the Strouds’ proof. Having jurisdiction under 28 U

851 F.Supp. 639 (1994) UNITED STATES of America v. ATLAS MINERALS AND CHEMICALS, INC., et al. v. R. Emory MABRY, et al. Civ. A. No. 91-5118. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 1, 1994. *640 *641 *642

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Anthem and Cigna, the nation’s second and third largest medical health insurance carriers, have agreed to merge. They propose to create the single largest seller of medical healthcare coverage to large commercial accounts, in a market in which there are only four national carriers still sta

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION .. .8 BACKGROUND.. .9 I. The Parties and Proposed Merger... 9 II. Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage.. .11 III. The Public Exchanges... 16 IV. Procedural History...

Case: 22-10511 Document: 00516927871 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/11/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 11, 2023 No. 22-105

Case: 22-10511 Document: 00516839677 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/31/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 31, 2023

KELLUM, Judge. Kim Van Pelt appeals the circuit court’s summary dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., in which he attacked' his capital-murder conviction and his resulting sentence of death. In December 2006, Van Pelt was convicted of capital murder pursuant to § 13A-5-40(a)(7), Ala.Code 1975, for murdering his wife, Sandra Marie Ozment Van Pelt, f

135 F.Supp.2d 1324 (2001) ELKEM METALS CO.; American Alloys, Inc.; Applied Industrial Materials Corp.; and CC Metals & Alloys, Inc., Plaintiffs/Plaintiff-Intervenors, and Globe Metallurgical, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, and Ferroatlantica de Venezuela; General Motors Corp.; Associação Brasileira dos Productores de Ferroligas e de Silico Metalico, et al.; and Ronly Holdings, Ltd., et al.,

OPINION STANCEU, Judge: Plaintiff Lerner New York, Inc. (“Lerner”) 1 brought this action to contest the tariff classification that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs” or “CBP”) applied to a women’s garment made of predominantly-nylon knitted fabric and containing an int

875 F.Supp. 550 (1994) Malcolm D. FLAVEL, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Group Representative Plaintiff, and Robert F. Cnare, James R. Conradt, Major Coxhill, Robert K. Elbel, Malcolm D. Flavel, Russell H. Graf, Robert L. Isferding, Robert E. Jones, Chalasani C. Rayan (deceased), Richard Spoonamore, and Ronald J. Weiss, Individual Plaintiffs, and The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commissio

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: This is a consolidated appeal. In United States v. Van Cauwenberghe, No. 89-50275, Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe appeals the denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion for return of property. In Biard v. Blair and Van Cauwenberghe, No. 89-55868, Van Cauwenberghe appeals an order of the district court that directed payment of money on deposit in the registry of the court to the pl