Cases

FILED OCTOBER 31, 2017 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE SWANSONHAYCOMPANY, ) ) No. 34566-

Supplemental Opinion Regarding Plan Conñrmation, Approving Settlements, and Approving Exit Financing STEVEN W. RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction.159 II. The Plan CONFIRMATION Prooess. i — 1 ZD i — I A. The City’s Plans of Adjustment. i — 1 <

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and integrity of this

961 A.2d 665 (2008) 183 Md. App. 406 ROYAL INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, et al. v. Don C. WANG. No. 2311, September Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. December 4, 2008. *671 Amy C.H. Grasso and Maury S. Epner (Miller & Canby, Ctd, on the brief), for appellant. Adam M. Spence (Spence &

*785FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Terrence F. McVerry, Senior United States District Judge I. Introduction The remaining claims in this four-year-old saga are breach of contract (Count Three) and fraud (Count Four) brought by Plaintiffs Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Company

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3683-14T2 JOAN MERNICK and JOHN MERNICK, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION September 3, 2015 Plaintiffs-Respondents,

Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court GK Development, Inc. v. Iowa Malls Financing Corp., 2013 IL App (1st) 112802 Appellate Court GK DEVELOPMENT, INC., an Illinois Corporation, and COLLEGE Caption SQUARE MALL DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. IOWA MALLS FINANCING C

William H. Plank, II, et al. v. James P. Cherneski, et al., Misc. No. 3, September Term, 2019, Opinion by Booth, J. FIDUCIARY DUTIES – MANAGING MEMBERS OWED TO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND MEMBERS – AGENCY. Managing members of an LLC owe common law fiduciary duties to the LLC and to the other members based upon the fiduciary relations governing the principles of agency. BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY AS AN INDEPENDENT CAUSE OF ACTION. In Kann v. Kann, 344 Md. 689 (1997), and our jurisprudence that

ORDER AND RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA I. INTRODUCTION Lately pregnant, a long-term employee, a certain store’s co-director, asks her direct supervisor for a restructured set of duties, i.e. an accommodation of responsibilities, none deemed “essential” or “primary.” Her doctor advises

J-A11039-15 2015 PA Super 208 SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. 69TH STREET RETAIL MALL, L.P., 69TH STREET RETAIL OWNER, L.P., 69TH STREET GP, LLC, 69TH STREET GP II, LLC, AAC MANAGEMENT CORP., AND ASHKENAZY ACQUISITION CORP. Appellants No. 2359 EDA 2014 Appeal

(2007) Angela MEDINA, an individual, Plaintiff, v. MULTALER, INC. dba Yon-Ka Paris Company, a Delaware corporation; Herve Pontacq, an individual,; and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. No. CV 06-00107 MMM (AJWx). United States District Court, CD. California. February 7, 2007. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARGARET M.

ACCEPTED 03-15-00446-CV 7113707 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00667-CV 3957344 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

350 F.Supp.2d 160 (2004) In Re NEW MOTOR VEHICLES CANADIAN EXPORT ANTITRUST LITIGATION No. MDL DOCKET NO. 1532. United States District Court, D. Maine. December 8, 2004. *161 *162 *163 *164 *165