Cases

*803Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cahill, J.), entered May 22, 2008 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release. While under probation supervision stemming from his prior conviction for criminal possession of

*939Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered March 31, 2006 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release. Petitioner is currently serving an aggregate prison sentence of 11 to 24 years for robb

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Feldstein, J.), entered April 22, 2010, which, among other things, dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release. Petitioner is currently serving an aggregate term of 12 to 36 years in prison having been convicted in two different counties of

Rose, J.P. Petitioner is currently serving an aggregate prison term of 2IV2 years to life arising out of his 1982 convictions for various drug offenses and attempted escape in the first degree. Following petitioner’s December 2007 appearance before the Board of Parole, his request for parole was denied and the Board ordered *1296him held for an additional 24 months.

127 Cal.Rptr.2d 436 (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 1264 Bart VALERIO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANDREW YOUNGQUIST CONSTRUTION, Defendant and Appellant. No. A094096. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Three. November 27, 2002. As Modified December 3, 2002. *437 Willett & McKay, Louis

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McGrath, J.), entered August 6, 2009 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner’s request for parole release. Petitioner is currently serving an aggregate prison sentence of 25 years to life for his 1982 conviction of murder in the second degree, two counts of burglary in t

2014 VT 18 Rodriguez v. Pallito and Vermont Parole Board (2013-155) 2014 VT 18 [Filed 07-Feb-2014] NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are reque

In a proceeding *953pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Board of Parole dated October 16, 2007, denying the petitioner’s application to be released on parole, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated April 28, 2008, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Ordered that the judgment i

FILED AUGUST 30, 2018 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 3

164 Cal.App.4th 248 (2008) YESENIA MONROY, an Incompetent Person, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents. PHOEBE P., a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. B196916. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. June 25, 2008.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S THIRD MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In these related class action cases, plaintiffs Vida F. Negrete (“Negrete”), as conservator for Everett Ow (“Ow”), and Carolyn B. Healey (“Healey”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and a nationwide class of an estimated 200,0

388 F.3d 1159 Michael Angelo MORALES, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Jeanne S. WOODFORD, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison, Respondent-Appellee. No. 99-99020. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted September 13, 2001. Filed July 28, 2003. Amended October 21, 2004.

58 Ill. App.3d 87 (1978) 374 N.E.2d 219 CHARLES A. QUILICO, Plaintiff, v. UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants. — (UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THOMAS REED & SONS, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.) No. 77-201. Illinois Appellate Court — Third District. Opinion filed February 9, 1978.<

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: This case, now at the summary judgment stage, involves claims that state parole officials, in portions of 2012, 2013, and 2014, unconstitutionally deprived plaintiff *689John Doe (“Doe”) of access to his infant child. Doe earlier had been convicted of sexual offenses against a teenage girl, fo

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ceresia Jr., J.), entered July 1, 2009 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release. Petitioner pleaded guilty to one count of identity theft in the first degree in satisfaction of numerous charges that he bilked various individuals out

Filed 9/18/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, G062071 v. (Super. Ct. No. 08NF4115) JARRELL KELLY, OPINION Defendant and Appellant. Appeal from a postjudgment o

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: Reporter@vtcourts.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2025 VT 39

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2015 VT 142

ENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2013-201 JULY TERM, 2015 State of Vermont } APPEALED FROM: } } v. } Superior Court, Chittenden Unit, } Criminal Division Scott Provost

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2016 VT 91