⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “VP Buildings, Inc. v. Nelson, Inc.”

Superior Court of Delaware · 2022-06-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-08-063 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )
Superior Court of Delaware · 2025-04-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-08-063 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011-11-21 · Published · cited 0× · 846 F. Supp. 2d 332; 2011 WL 5855013; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133848
MEMORANDUM WILLIAM L. STANDISH, District Judge. I Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 filed by Plaintiff, Velocity International, Inc. (‘Velocity”), and Defendant, Celerity Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (“Celerity”), in connection with claims asserted by Velocity in Civil Action Nos. 09-102 and 09-151. (Docket No. 73, No. 86). In addition,
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-11 · Published · cited 0×
FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-11-25 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-15-00991-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009-04-17 · Published · cited 22× · 404 B.R. 593; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 1025; 2009 WL 1044869
404 B.R. 593 (2009) In re ACCESS CARDIOSYSTEMS, INC., Debtor. Access Cardiosystems, Inc., North American Enterprises, Inc., John Moriarty and Associates, John J. Moriarty, Richard F. Connolly, Jr., and Joseph R. Zimmell, Plaintiffs, Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Access Cardiosystems, Inc., *594 Plaintiffs-Intervenors,[1] v. Randall Fincke, Defendant. Bank
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2010-03-10 · Published · cited 0× · 703 F. Supp. 2d 1051; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22106
703 F.Supp.2d 1051 (2010) WYNDHAM VACATION FAIRFIELD RESORTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ARCHITECTS HAWAII LIMITED; GROUP PACIFIC (HAWAII), INC.; Dick Pacific Construction Co., Ltd., Defendants. Architects Hawaii Limited, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Notkin Hawaii, Inc.; Dick Pacific Construction Co., Ltd.; John Does 1-10; Jane Does 1-20; Doe Partnerships 1-20; Doe Corporations 1-20; Doe Entities 1-20; and Doe Governmental Units 1-20, Third-Par
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005-07-21 · Published · cited 3× · 382 F. Supp. 2d 326; 2005 WL 1719733
382 F.Supp.2d 326 (2005) Raymond CAPUANO v. ISLAND COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC. et al No. 3:03CV1572 (JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. July 21, 2005. *327 *328 *329 Jeffrey S. Bagnell, Horner & Bagnell, Stephen P. Horner, Law Offices of St
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-08-17 · Published · cited 66× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57759; 2006 WL 2380622
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999-08-31 · Published · cited 44× · 189 F.3d 321
189 F.3d 321 (3rd Cir. 1999) BALD EAGLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT; SOUTH BUTLER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, School Districts of the Third Class, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,v.KEYSTONE FINANCIAL, INC., a Bank Holding Company; MID-STATE BANK & TRUST CO., a Pennsylvania Bank and Trust Company; WILLIAM H. BOGEL; NANCY F. FOGEL; ROBERT LEECH; ROBERT R. MAGILL, individualsBALD EAGLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT; SOUTH BUTLE
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-27 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 5038192 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-06-26 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-14-00384-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/26/2015 8:35:53 PM
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013-10-04 · Published · cited 16× · 507 B.R. 558; 2013 WL 5524696; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 4244
COUNTS VIII, IX AND X AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (MODIFYING PARTS I AND II) JACK B. SCHMETTERER, Bankruptcy Judge. This proceeding was tried on remand after appeals to the Seventh Circuit by both parties from a judgment entered following the first trial. The parties rested after further trial on issues remanded, and final arguments were filed in writing. Findings of Fact an
Goo v. Arakawa.public domain
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014-02-19 · Published · cited 10× · 132 Haw. 304; 321 P.3d 655; 2014 WL 641093; 2014 Haw. LEXIS 85
Opinion of the Court by POLLACK, J. This case addresses the issue of the procedure that an appellate court should follow when a ease becomes moot on appeal and one party seeks vacatur of the lower court’s judgment. We hold that the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) erred in vacating the circuit court’s judgments and December 31, 2
California Court of Appeal · 2017-06-01 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 6/1/17 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGANS FOR OPEN D069189 GOVERNMENT, Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2015-00011951- v.
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014-10-31 · Published · cited 0× · 57 F. Supp. 3d 1095; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154885; 2014 WL 5511403
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. Plaintiff Jeffrey Schmitz brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Insurance Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., seeking long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits under a policy issued to Schmitz’s former employer, Banner Engineering Inc., (“Banner”) by Defe