⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “VOTE.ORG v. BYRD”

Vote.Org v. Paxtonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-12-15 · Published · cited 26× · 89 F.4th 459
Case: 22-50536 Document: 00517004327 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOAH T. BYRD, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-1512 (TJK) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION While serving in the Navy for over six years, Noah Byrd worked mainly in aircraft mainte- nance as an Aviation Machinist’s Mate. In 2008, howeve
District Court, N.D. New York · 2018-09-21 · Published · cited 1× · 333 F. Supp. 3d 111
GLENN T. SUDDABY, Chief United States District Judge Currently before the Court, in this products liability action filed by Shaquil Byrd ("Plaintiff") against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Janssen"), and Johnson & Johnson ("Defendants"), is Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50 or, in the alternative, for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. (Dkt. No. 199.) For the reasons set
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023-12-01 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2023-2252 _____________________________ SECRETARY OF STATE BYRD, the FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, and the FLORIDA SENATE, Appellants, v. BLACK VOTERS MATTER CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE, INC., EQUAL GROUND EDUCATION FUND, INC., LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA EDUCATION FUND,
Jones v. Reevespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-11-19 · Published · cited 2× · 121 F.4th 531
Case: 24-60371 Document: 73-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/19/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED
McCormack v. Scottpublic domain
Vermont Superior Court · 2024-09-27 · Published · cited 0×
VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Washington Unit Case No. 24-CV-02419 65 State Street Montpelier VT 05602 802-828-2091 www.vermontjudiciary.org Richard McCormack et al v. Phil Scott et al Ruling on Motion to Dismiss On April 15, 2024, Defendant Governor
McCormack v. Scottpublic domain
Vermont Superior Court · 2024-09-27 · Published · cited 0×
VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Washington Unit Case No. 24-CV-02419 65 State Street Montpelier VT 05602 802-828-2091 www.vermontjudiciary.org Richard McCormack et al v. Phil Scott et al Ruling on Motion to Dismiss On April 15, 2024, Defendant Governor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-08-14 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 04690
Matter of Common Cause N.Y. v Kosinski (2025 NY Slip Op 04690) Matter of Common Cause N.Y. v Kosinski 2025 NY Slip Op 04690 Decided on August 14, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015-03-03 · Published · cited 6× · 123 F. Supp. 3d 990; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25251; 2015 WL 996389
Memorandum Opinion and Order GARY FEINERMAN, United States District Judge Facing massive budget shortfalls, the Chicago Board of Education decided in 2013 to close dozens of public schools. Citywide protests followed. So did the lawsuits,' including this one brought against the Board of Education and its Chief Executive Officer (together, “Board”) by, among others, Friends of Trumbull, an uni
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026-05-21 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JEFFREY OLSON, No. 24-6527 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:18-cv-00360- DJC-JDP v. ORDER AND FCA US, LLC, a Delaware
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2025-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DIVISION BROWN, C. J., BARNES, P. J., and WATKINS, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules July 2,
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020-03-31 · Published · cited 3× · 954 F.3d 713
Case: 19-60244 Document: 00515365530 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 31, 2020 No. 19-60244
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-12-13 · Published · cited 29× · 843 F.3d 617; 2016 WL 7228814
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: A group of Houston-area pastors and a council representing the interests of Houston-area pastors challenge the dismissal of their claims against Annise Parker, the former mayor of Houston. The district court found, variously, ■ that plaintiffs lacked standing, that they failed to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), that they
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2013-08-07 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-12-00191-CV DRIVEWAY AUSTIN GP, LLC, APPELLANT V. TURBO PARTNERS, LLC, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 53rd District Court Travis County, Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2013-08-07 · Published · cited 0× · 409 S.W.3d 197; 2013 WL 4525702; 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 9846
PATRICK A. PIRTLE, Justice, dissenting. Ultimately, the issue in this case comes down to this, is the specific supermajority requirement of paragraph 3.08 of the limited partnership agreement, providing for removal of the general partner by the unanimous vote of the Class B Limited Partners, an exception to the general simple majority requirement of paragraph 9.06 of that agreement, providing for the amendment
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2019-04-23 · Published · cited 1× · 384 F. Supp. 3d 982
WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge *984Plaintiff Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc., and four of its health care providers bring this lawsuit against Wisconsin Attorney General Joshua Kaul, the District Attorney for Dane County Ismael Ozanne, in his official capacity and as a representative of a defendant class of District Attorneys, the Secretary of the Department of
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2021-03-10 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Mohsen A. Baddourah, as a member of the City Council of the City of Columbia, Appellant, v. Henry McMaster, in his capacity as Governor for the State of South Carolina, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2017-002576 Appeal from Richland County G. Thomas Cooper Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2021-03-10 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Mohsen A. Baddourah, as a member of the City Council of the City of Columbia, Appellant, v. Henry McMaster, in his capacity as Governor for the State of South Carolina, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2017-002576 Appeal from Richland County G. Thomas Cooper Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Washington Supreme Court · 2025-09-04 · Published · cited 0×
FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON SEPTEMBER 4, 2025 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON SEPTEMBER 4, 2025 SARAH R. PENDLETON