Cases

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: Appellant Stephen Simon appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil suit against approximately 1,600 defendants in the health insurance industry. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we AFFIRM. I. When filing this appeal, Simon requested initial en banc hearing pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The judges of th

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIE WILLIAMS; LADON Nos. 24-933 CLINE; PAUL CONTRERAS, on 24-2970 behalf of themselves and all others D.C. No. similarly situated, 8:20-cv-01701- PSG-JDE Plaintiff

Kirsch, Judge. [1] After Angela Kincaid ("Kincaid"), an employee working for both EngineAir, Inc. ("EngineAir") and JMA Rail Products, Inc. ("JMA"), was convicted of having embezzled more than $500,000 from the companies' bank accounts, the companies sued Kincaid's depositary bank, 1 Centra Credit Union ("Centra Credit"). Citin

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Saris, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Abdulrahman Alharbi is a twenty-three-year-old student from Saudi Ara*340bia, who resides in Revere, Massachusetts. He was a spectator at the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013, was injured in the bombing, and was questioned by federal authorities investigating the e

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On June 28, 2011, Robert Briseno filed a complaint against ConAgra;1 between Oc*938tober and December 2011, the court consolidated several cases filed against ConA-gra under the caption above

Case 15-32077 Document 1 Filed in TXSB on 04/13/15 Page 1 of 72 ‘W-"'3' United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District ofTexas

ACCEPTED 05-15-01480-CV 05-15-01480-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/4/2015 2:42:24 PM

788 F.Supp.2d 253 (2011) Ricardo COPANTITLA, Diego Diaz De La Vega, Ignacio Garcia, Freddy Guachun, Julio Lantigua, Manuel Lizandro, Martin Lopez, Sebastian Lopez, Augustin Maldonado, Henry Matute, Joelito Melendez, Aussencio Ramirez, and Jose Luis Vargas, Plaintiffs, v. FISKARDO ESTIATORIO, INC. d/b/a Thalassa Restaurant, George Makris, Julia Makris, Steve Makris, and Fantis Foods, Inc., Defendants. No. 09 Civ. 1608(RJH).</

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. The debtor-appellant, FedPak Systems, Inc. (“FedPak”), challenges the district court’s decision to vacate an order of the bankruptcy court for lack of jurisdiction. We hold that because FedPak did not have standing to seek the order, the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction as a matter of constitutional law. Additionally, we hold that the proceeding initia

25 A.3d 873 (2011) Charles E. PRESLEY and Victoria D. Presley, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. COMMERCIAL MOVING & RIGGING, INC. and CMR Leasing, Inc., Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., Jacobs Facilities, Inc. f/k/a Sverdrup Facilities, Inc., and CRSS Constructors, Inc., Appellees. Nos. 07-CV-341, 07-CV-399. District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

OPINION AND ORDER SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. 1. INTRODUCTION In this consolidated multi-district litigation (“MDL”), plaintiffs seek relief from contamination, or threatened contamination, of groundwater from various defendants’ use of the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (“MTBE”) and/or tertiary butyl alcohol (“TBA”), which is a product that is formed by the natural degrad

388 F.Supp.2d 1148 (2005) E. & J. GALLO WINERY, Plaintiff, v. ENCANA ENERGY SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, formerly known as Pancanadian Energy Services Inc.; Encana Corporation, a Canadian corporation, formerly known as and successor to Pancanadian Energy Corporation, Defendants. No. CVF03-5412 AWILJO. United States District Court, E.D. California. July 6, 2005.</

208 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2000) STEPHEN SIMON, an individual and as assignee of assignors, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.VALUE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC., GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA; VALUE HEALTH, INC.; ROBERT E. PATRICELLI, LTD.; AMERICAN PSYCHMANAGEMENT, INC; PREFERRED HEALTHCARE, LTD; HEALTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.; THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY; HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC.; HEALTH RISK MANAGEMENT, HEALTH INSURANCE ASSOC

74 Cal.Rptr.2d 843 (1998) 955 P.2d 469 18 Cal.4th 200 Ruth SHULMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. GROUP W PRODUCTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. S058629. Supreme Court of California. June 1, 1998. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing July 29, 1998.[*]

*1178 BOGUE, Senior District Judge. This case arises out of an explosion and fire in Gwinner, North Dakota at The Melroe Company’s manufacturing plant, on January 31, 1993. The plaintiffs, Arkwright Mutual Insurance Company and Insurance Company of North America were Melroe’s property insurers at the t

83 Cal.Rptr.2d 548 (1999) 973 P.2d 527 20 Cal.4th 163 CEL-TECH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. No. S066735. Supreme Court of California. April 8, 1999. *552 Spiegel Liao & Kagay and Cha

667 F.Supp. 1246 (1987) NAKED CITY, INC., Dick Drost, Melinda Bohanon, Florence Gay Slater, Plaintiffs, v. Greg AREGOOD, et al., Defendants. No. L 87-56. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. August 21, 1987. *1247 Douglas Palaschak, Ventura, Cal., for plaintiffs. Kathryn B. O'Neall, Remington, I

WETTICK, A.J., Plaintiffs are Bercon Packaging, Inc., the lessee of a new Lincoln Continental, and Robert W. Henderson, the chairman of Bercon Packaging, who had the use of this automobile for personal and business purposes pursuant to his employment contract. Defendants are Benson-Hartman Motors, Inc. (Benson Lincoln), the automobile dealer from which Bercon Packaging leased the Lincoln, and Ford Motor Company, the manuf

Opinion GRODIN, J. The principal question in this appeal is whether Civil Code1 section 49, subdivision (c), gives a corporate employer a cause of action for damages resulting from injuries to a key employee caused by a third party’s negligence. For the reasons stated in part II of this opinion we conclude that it does not. In part I we

593 F.Supp. 710 (1984) INTERNATIONAL WOOD PROCESSORS, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. POWER DRY, INC., a corporation, Power Dry Patent, Inc., a corporation, Drywood Corporation, a corporation, Compton & Cloer Lumber Company, a corporation, General Wood Processors, Inc., a corporation, European Banking Company Limited, a United Kingdom company, K.N. Hronopoulos, an individual, Delano Compton, an individual, Arthur J. Crowley, an individual, Defen