Cases

471 F.3d 158 Venita COLBERT, Appellantv.John E. POTTER, Postmaster General United States Postal Service, Appellee. No. 05-5330. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued October 13, 2006. Decided December 15, 2006. Appeal from the United States District Court for

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 16, 2002 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. VENITA MICHELLE BURCHELL Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 99-D-3069 Seth Norman, Judge No. M2001-02153-CCA-R3-CD - Filed November 13, 2002 Venita Michelle Burchell appeals from her aggravated child abuse and criminally n

992 F.Supp. 951 (1998) Joyce TOLBERT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, et al., Defendants. No. 3:97 CV 7592. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. February 6, 1998. William B. Senhauser, Equal Justice Foundation, Toledo, OH, for Joyce Tolbert, Venita Rodgers, Veronica Cherry, Laurel Nemec, Patricia Nettles and Stella Cam

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 ROBERT W. GETTLEMAN, District Judge. After eight years of litigation, 27 days of trial to the bench on the issue of liability, and extensive post-trial briefing, this case boils down to four basic questions: (1) Do the named plaintiffs have standing? (2) Did the 2004 student as

709 S.E.2d 2 (2011) WATSON v. The STATE. No. S10A1744. Supreme Court of Georgia. March 25, 2011. *4 Jeffrey L. Grube, Warner Robins, for appellant. T. Rabb Wilkerson, III, District Attorney, Venita Sheree McCoy, Jason Edward Ashford, Assistant District Attorneys, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Paula Kristian Smith, S

896 So.2d 1146 (2005) Venita MATTHEWS v. Faith Chiason BREAUX and State Farm Insurance Company. No. 04-CA-958. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. February 15, 2005. *1147 John L. Dorsey, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant. Patrick D. Derouen, Laurie L. DeArmond, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant/Appellee.

O’BRIEN, P.J. Defendant, Edward Pinkney, was convicted by a jury of five counts of election forgery, MCL 168.937, but acquitted of six counts of making a false statement in a certificate-of-recall petition, MCL 168.957. He was sentenced as a fourth-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.12, to concurrent prison terms of 30 to 120 months. He appeals as of right his December 15, 2014 judgm

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE ERIC D. WALLACE V. ARVIL CHAPMAN, WARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court of Wayne County No. 15154 Robert L. Jones, Judge No. M2012-00749-CCA-R3-HC - Filed November 9, 2012 Eric D. Wallace (“the Petitioner”), proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that (1) his indictment for attempted first d

74 Wn. App. 81 (1994) 871 P.2d 1123 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. VENITA TATUM, Appellant. No. 29842-9-I. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. May 2, 1994. Jessica A. Ryan of Washington Appellate Defender Association, for appellant. Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Theresa L. Fricke,

957 S.W.2d 491 (1997) Eva C. BRINNER a/k/a Eva Cheryl Brinner, Appellant, v. Larry HUCKABA and Darlene Y. Huckaba, Respondents. No. 71573. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. December 16, 1997. *492 Edward K. Fehlig, Ziercher & Hocker, St. Louis, for appellant. Daniel C. Nelson, Jeffery T. McPh

707 F.Supp. 1101 (1989) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Venita J. COLEMAN, Deetra T. Kindle, Ella Simone Terrill, and Elana Roxanne Terrill, Defendants. No. 88-00013-03/06-CR-W-JWO. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D. February 28, 1989. *1102 Patrick Lysaught, Kevin Locke, Kansas City, Mo., for Elama Roxanne

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs January 5, 2011 ERIC D. WALLACE v. STEPHEN DOTSON, WARDEN Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County No. 10-CR-114 Joseph H. Walker, III, Judge No. W2010-01784-CCA-R3-HC - Filed May 17, 2011 The Petitioner, Eric D. Wallace, was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court jury

PER CURIAM. This case is currently before the Court upon James Darnell Smith’s appeal from his district court jury conviction for armed robbery, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a), (d) and 2. On appeal, Smith contends that the district court erred in refusing to allow expert witness testimony about the reliability of eyewitness identification. Upon consideration of this perplex

OPINION OF THE COURT The issues presented on appeal are: 1) whether the amendment of Count VI of the Information after the close of the Government's case-in-chief was prejudicial to the Defendant; 2) whether the Government proved all elements of Count VI of the Information charging Arson in the Second Degree beyond a reasonable doubt; and 3) whether the Government proved all elements of Count V of the Information charging Burglary in the F

811 So.2d 1033 (2002) STATE of Louisiana v. Chester F. ONEZIME. No. 01-KA-1018. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. February 26, 2002. *1035 Paul D. Connick, Jr., District Attorney, Terry M. Boudreaux, Thomas J. Butler, Brad Burget, Assistant District Attorneys, Gretna, LA, for State of Louisiana, Plaintiff-Appellee.

MARCEL, Judge. Mrs. Venita Jacob Cambre, tutrix of the minor, Renette Maria Cambre, appeals a portion of the judgment of the lower court in the partition suit between Garden Hill Land Corporation v. Succession of Edwin Cambre. Specifically, she appeals that portion of the judgment in favor of the in-tervenor, Kenneth J. Ward, granting him 50% of the proceeds from the sale of the minor’s property. The tutr

241 F.Supp.2d 780 (2003) Clarence SCOTT, Petitioner, v. Barbara BOCK, Respondent. No. 99-10274-BC. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division. January 17, 2003. *781 Clarence Scott, Eastlake, MI, Pro se. Thomas M. Chambers, Wayne County Prosecutor's Office, Detroit, MI, Debra M. Gagliardi, Michigan Depa

128 F.Supp.2d 483 (2001) Ernest ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, et al., Defendants. No. 99CV797. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. January 19, 2001. *484 *485 *486 Retanio Rucker, The Smith &am;

*407Opinion HUFFMAN, J. Julie B. (Mother) appeals the judgment of the juvenile court terminating her parental rights concerning her daughter, Christina L., pursuant to Civil Code section 232. Mother contends the juvenile court erred in overruling her demurrer and motion to dismiss the petition, in which she argued she received inadequate notice of the al

1 Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts I and II B. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 406 OPINION Julie B. (Mother) appeals the judgment of the juvenile court terminati