Cases

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JER HUDSON GP XXI LLC and ) HUDSON HOUSING TAX CREDIT ) FUND XXI LP, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0478-MTZ ) DLE INVESTORS, LP, )

CONTENTS FINDINGS OF FACT . 164 I. Introducing the Carroll Family . 165 II. Solving the Low Basis Dilemma . 168 III. Selling the Son-of-BOSS Strategy . 171 IV. Achieving the Basis Boost . 173 A. Son-of-BOSS . 174 B. Basis Boost

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Karen V. Murphy, J.), entered July 30, 2015. The order denied the petition to quash or modify subpoenas duces tecum issued on March 26, 2015. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The petitioners commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR 2

Appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Karen V. Murphy, J.), entered March 25, 2015, and July 30, 2015. The order entered March 25, 2015, insofar as appealed from, denied that branch of the petition which was to quash subpoenas du-ces tecum issued on July 24, 2014. The order entered July 30, 2015, denied the petitioners’ motion for leave to renew the petition, or, in the alternativ

461 B.R. 440 (2011) In re TRENTON RIDGE INVESTORS, LLC and Coventry East Investors, LLC, Debtors and Debtors in Possession. Nos. 09-62570, 09-63160. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division, at Columbus. June 23, 2011. *450 Thomas R. Allen, Allen Kuehnle Stovall & Neuman LLP, Columbus, OH, for Debtors.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HULLEY ENTERPRISES LTD, et al., Petitioners, Civil Action No. 14-1996 v. Judge Beryl A. Howell THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, Respondent.

USCA11 Case: 19-12736 Date Filed: 02/17/2021 Page: 1 of 37 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-12736 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-04020-AT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL.,

OPINION AND ORDER KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge. I. Background On February 24, 2011, Anthony Paduano, Esq., the court-appointed receiver (“Receiver”) for Plaintiffs Cobalt Multifamily Investors I LLC, Cobalt Multifamily CO. I, LLC, Cobalt Capital Funding, LLC, and Vail Mountain Trust (“the Cobalt Entities”) moved for summary judgment against Arthur Landsman, Michael Eis

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEXLER, District Judge: Plaintiffs commenced this diversity action seeking damages for breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation. Presently before the court is Defendant Thomas Unger’s motion, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, or in the alternative, to transfer this matter. For the reasons

DECISION ON MOTIONS FOR ■'SUM- , MARY - JUDGMENT . AND ASSET FREEZING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ROBERT E. GERBER, UNITED' STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE: In the chapter 11 cases of debtors Soundview Elite Ltd. (“Elite”) and its affiliates (collectively, and with Elite, the “Soundview Debtors”), plaintiff Corinne Ball (the “Trüstee”) was appointed chapter 11 trustee for the Soundview Debtors after this Court removed

350 S.W.3d 659 (2011) Steven DEFTERIOS and Henry S. Miller Commercial Co., Appellants, v. DALLAS BAYOU BEND, LTD.; Dallas Clubview Gardens, L.P.; Pecan Square, Ltd.; Woodside Apartments, L.P.; BNC Regency Walk, L.P., BN Regency, L.L.C., BNC Lake Jackson Village, L.P., Appellees. No. 05-08-01726-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. August 19, 2011.

James A. Teilborg, Senior United States District Judge Three sets of motions are pending before the Court. First are Defendants Baxter Healthcare Corporation ("Baxter"), Scientific Protein Laboratories, LLC ("SPL"), and American Capital Limited's ("ACAS") (collectively "Defendants") motions to exclude Plaintiffs Charlisa, Joshua, and Jennifer Allen's (collectively "Plaintiffs") expert witnesses Ronald Moore, (Doc. 149), Suzanne Pari

2005 MT 21 DAVID G. COLE, Plaintiff, Respondent and Cross-Appellant, v. VALLEY ICE GARDEN, L.L.C., VALLEY ICE GARDEN MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., and WILLIAM MARTEL, Defendants and Appellants. No. 03-729 Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs: February 1, 2005 Decided: February 9, 2005 For Appellants: Richard J. Andriolo, Esq., Andriolo & Refling

OPINION OF THE COURT Graffeo, J. At issue on this appeal is whether the Martin Act (General Business Law art 23-A) preempts plaintiffs common-law causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty and gross negligence. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that plaintiffs common-law claims are not preempted. Plaintiff Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. commenced this action against defendant J.P Mor

902 A.2d 784 (2006) Marla BRIN, Appellant, v. S.E.W. INVESTORS, et al., Appellees. No. 02-CV-649. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued December 14, 2004. Decided July 13, 2006. *786 Marc Fiedler, with whom William P. Lightfoot, Washington, DC, was on the brief, for appellant. Andrew Butz, with who

615 F.3d 97 (2010) MORTIMER OFF SHORE SERVICES, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. The FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Docket Nos. 08-1783-cv (L), 08-2358-cv (XAP). United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: May 13, 2009. Decided: July 26, 2010. *98 Peder A.

728 F.Supp.2d 354 (2010) Pasha S. ANWAR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LIMITED, et al., Defendants. No. 09 Civ. 0118(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 29, 2010. *355 David A. Barrett, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Christopher Lovell, Victor E. Stewart, Jody Krisiloff, Lovell Stewart Halebia

700 F.Supp.2d 599 (2010) G. Philip STEPHENSON, as Trustee of the Philip Stephenson Revocable Living Trust, Plaintiff, v. CITCO GROUP LIMITED; CITCO Fund Services (Europe) BV; CITCO (Canada), Inc.; and Pricewaterhouse-Coopers, LLP (an Ontario limited liability partnership), Defendants. No. 09 CV 00716(RJH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 1, 2010.

OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Ellington Credit Fund, Ltd., and ECF Special Securities, LLC — two hedge funds that invested in a series of mortgage-backed securities — bring this diversity action against Defendants Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (“M & T”), Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (“SPS”), and various affiliated entities of SPS (“SPS Affilia

ACCEPTED 14-15-00695-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/