Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Universal Bank, N.A. v. Stamos”
Firstar Bank of Illinois v. Peircepublic domain
714 N.E.2d 116 (1999) 306 Ill. App.3d 525 239 Ill.Dec. 558 FIRSTAR BANK OF ILLINOIS, as guardian of Alojzy Klim, a minor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard PEIRCE, M.D., Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-98-2579. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division. June 30, 1999. *117
Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bankpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MORAN, Chief Judge. Back in 1987 this court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Their argument then was that only an insignificant number of American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago *784(ANB) 90-day unsecured commercial loans were made at rates less than ANB’s declared prime rate. Defendants relied upon
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT AUSTIN ON MOTION FOR REHEARING <
St. Paul Federal Bank v. Wesbypublic domain
JUSTICE SCARIANO delivered the opinion of the court: Appellant, 3600 Condominium Associates, appeals from the denial of its motion to reconsider entry of summary judgment giving St. Paul Federal Bank for Savings (St. Paul) and City Consumer Services, Inc. (City Consumer), first and second priorities, respectively, over the proceeds of a foreclosure sale of Unit 615 at 36
Defendants, Illinois Housing Development Authority and Harris Trust and Savings Bank (collectively IHDA), appeal a summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff La Salle National Bank (La Salle), which found that La Salle had the right to prepay its obligation to IHDA on a mortgage. We are asked to decide whether there exists a material issue of triable fact or an ambiguity in the mortgage contract which should have precluded entry of summary judgment. La Salle is trustee unde
Central National Bank v. Fleetwood Realty Corp.public domain
110 Ill. App.3d 169 (1982) 441 N.E.2d 1244 CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK IN CHICAGO, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. FLEETWOOD REALTY CORPORATION et al., Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants. No. 81-647. Illinois Appellate Court First District (2nd Division). Opinion filed October 26, 1982. *170
Raymond R. Wiskotoni v. Michigan National Bank-Westpublic domain
JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge. Michigan National Bank-West (Bank) appeals the district court’s denial of its motions for judgment NOV, remittitur, and for a new trial following the entry of a judgment on a jury verdict for $64,982 for damages arising from the Bank’s termination of one of its branch managers, Raymond R. Wiskotoni. Wiskotoni claimed that his discharge was in violation of the terms of an implied employment
Lawler v. The University of Chicago Medical Centerpublic domain
JUSTICE FREEMAN delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. *1092 ¶ 1 In this case, we consider whether the relation back statute ( 735 ILCS 5/2-616(b) (West 2010)) applies to a wrongful death claim when the death occurs more than four years after the alleged act of negligence. P
Terrance Henderson v. J. Harmonpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6029 Doc: 52 Filed: 05/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 16 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-6029 TERRANCE ROBERT HENDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J.A. HARMON, Hearings Officer, Nottoway Correctional Center; CARL MANIS,
OPINION TOM GRAY, Chief Justice Gustavo Carapia is a student at.Texas A & M University. He sued the University and University officials Dave Parrott and Brigadier - General Joe Ramirez alleging a violation of due process and requested a temporary injunction.’ We collectively refer to the University and the officials as “TAMU.” TAMU filed a plea to the j
Agnew v. Shawpublic domain
823 N.E.2d 1046 (2005) 355 Ill. App.3d 981 291 Ill.Dec. 460 Rita AGNEW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles T. SHAW, Henry Wiggins, and Universal Radiology, Ltd., Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-02-3233. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. January 28, 2005. *1047 Cl
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Coleman Law Firmpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge. In its role as receiver for the George Washington Savings Bank (the “Bank”), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) has brought suit against the Coleman Law Firm (“Coleman”) and Kevin Flynn & Associates (“Flynn”), seeking recovery of funds paid to them by the Bank in alleged violation of 12 U.S.C. § 1828(k)(3).
Willis v. Moralespublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Lawler v. University of Chicago Medical Centerpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Willis v. Moralespublic domain
2020 IL App (1st) 180718 No. 1-18-0718 June 15, 2020 FIRST DIVISION IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT ALMA WILLIS,
Surgery Center at 900 North Michigan Avenue, LLC v. American Physicians Assurance Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HONORABLE JEFFREY COLE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The plaintiff, The Surgery Center at 900 North Michigan Avenue (“The Surgery Center”) has filed a motion to compel the defendants, American Physicians Assurance Corporation (“APAC”) and American Physicians Capital (“APC”) to produce documents in response to plaintiffs Document Requests No. 12, and to respond to plaintiffs
Donovan v. Quadepublic domain
*466 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER NAN R. NOLAN, United States Magistrate Judge. This case arises out of a disintegrating business relationship between the two co-owners of the copyrights in a play called Late Nite Catechism (“LNC”), who also jointly own a corporation, Quade/Donovan Entertainment, Inc. (“QDE”). Plaintiff/Counter-Def
Nelson v. Quarles & Brady, LLPpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Moldflow Corp. v. Simcon, Inc.public domain
296 F.Supp.2d 34 (2003) MOLDFLOW CORPORATION and Moldflow Ireland, Ltd., Plaintiffs v. SIMCON, INC., and Simcon Kunststofftechnische Software, GmbH Defendants. No. CIV.A.02-12123-RCL. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 22, 2003. *35 *36 Steven M. Bauer, John J. Cotter, Jo
Hurd v. Wildman, Harrold, Allen and Dixonpublic domain
707 N.E.2d 609 (1999) 303 Ill. App.3d 84 236 Ill.Dec. 482 Matthew A. HURD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN AND DIXON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-98-1277. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. February 2, 1999. *611 Eugene K. Hollander, The Law