⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United Van Lines Inc v. Logan”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015-04-27 · Published · cited 40× · 784 F.3d 1183; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7072; 2015 WL 1881199
SMITH, Circuit Judge. Chavis Van & Storage of Myrtle Beach, Inc. (“Chavis”) appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on its breach-of-contract claim against United Van Lines, LLC.; Transportation Services Group, Inc.; and Uni-Group, Inc. (collectively, “United”). Chavis also appeals the
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012-04-10 · Published · cited 0× · 871 F. Supp. 2d 1186; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53027; 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1414; 2012 WL 1605533
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SMITH, District Judge. If the regional manager of a national food chain directs the manager of a restaurant under his supervision to hand over her keys to the workplace,1 and advises her “to quit because [she is] about to be *1193fired,”2 is that equivalent t
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019-01-23 · Published · cited 17× · 364 F. Supp. 3d 732
Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Element Transportation, LLC's *734("Element Transportation") Motion for Summary Judgment. [R. 98.] Plaintiffs Gale Carter and Forbes Hayes (hereinafter "Plaintiffs") responded, [R. 110], and Element Transportation replied, [R. 113]. Also before the Court is Plaintiffs
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996-02-26 · Published · cited 5× · 919 F. Supp. 168; 1996 WL 82483
919 F.Supp. 168 (1996) Geoffrey WHALING and Trisha Anne Hessinger v. ATLAS VAN LINES, INC., Harvey Worldwide Moving & Storage and Scannell Moving and Storage. No. 95-CV-1878. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 26, 1996. *169 Edward J. Hayes, Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel, Philadelphia, PA, for
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2025-07-16 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Meredith Logan Whitehurst, Appellant, v. Town of Sullivan's Island, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2023-001928 Appeal From Charleston County Bentley Price, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28290 Heard November 14, 2024 – Filed July 16, 2025
Houston v. Loganpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012-03-21 · Published · cited 0× · 674 F.3d 613; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 5817; 2012 WL 934017
674 F.3d 613 (2012) Clifford Leon HOUSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James F. LOGAN, Jr., Defendant-Appellee. No. 11-6379. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 21, 2012. ON BRIEF: James F. Logan, Jr., Logan-Thompson, P.C., Cleveland, Tennessee, for Appellee. Clifford Leon Houston, Ten Mile, Tennessee, pro se. Before: KEITH, MARTIN, and GIBBONS,
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019-01-10 · Published · cited 3× · 199 A.3d 634
Nebeker, Senior Judge: Appellants Paul Ashby, Keith Logan, and Merle Watson appeal, together and separately, various convictions related to the kidnapping and murder of Carnell Bolden and the shooting of Danielle Daniels on December 30, 2009. The three were jointly tried before a jury in July and August of 2013, and were found guilty of a majority of the charged offenses. Given the fa
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003-08-29 · Published · cited 3× · 282 F. Supp. 2d 776; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15980; 2003 WL 22132716
282 F.Supp.2d 776 (2003) LOGAN FARMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HBH, INC. DE, et al., Defendants. No. C-1-01-437. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. August 29, 2003. *777 *778 *779 *780 C. Vernon Law
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001-04-04 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 99-3972 Terry Logan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Caterpillar, Inc., Rita Knapp, David Wendling, Eric Rueschhoff, and Wendy Watta f/k/a Vosberg, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 98 C 6391--Charles P. Kocoras, Judge. Argued October 26, 2000--Decided April 4, 2001 Before Easterbrook, Kanne, and Evans, Circuit Judges. Kanne, C
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2013-10-08 · Published · cited 0× · 498 B.R. 525
OPINION DUNCAN W. KEIR, Bankruptcy Judge. Defendant Michael E. McLean (hereinafter “Debtor”) filed a voluntary Petition commencing a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case on September 9, 2010 (the “Petition Date”). On January 18, 2011, Creditor Airpack, Inc. (“Airpack”) commenced Adversary Proceeding No. 11-039 by the filing of a “Complaint Objecting To Discharge Of Certain Debt.” That complaint asserted t
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004-09-03 · Published · cited 3× · 382 F.3d 1340; 2004 WL 1949853
RADER, Circuit Judge. On summary judgment, the United States Court of Federal Claims held that the Government contracted with Richard C. LaVan, Carmen Lullo, and James Sko-zek during the conversion of Century Savings & Loan Association (CSLA) into a federally chartered stock thrift called Century Federal Savings Bank (Century), that the Government breached that contract, that the Government had to pay restitution but not
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004-09-03 · Published · cited 17× · 382 F.3d 1340; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18731
382 F.3d 1340 Richard C. LA VAN, Carmen Lullo, Ronald S. Kraar, Donald Bialon, and James Skozek, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, andFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plantiff,v.UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 03-5140. No. 03-5149. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. September 3, 2004.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990-12-17 · Published · cited 6× · 920 F.2d 1301; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21731; 1990 WL 204203
DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge. The Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, as amended in 1906 by the Carmack Amendment, requires common carriers to issue bills of lading for property received for transportation. 49 U.S.C. § 11707(a)(1). The current form of the legislation also permits the ICC to authorize a carrier to set rates under which the carrier’s liability for damage to such
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2002-08-20 · Published · cited 0× · 53 Fed. Cl. 290; 2002 U.S. Claims LEXIS 208; 2002 WL 1964015
OPINION FIRESTONE, Judge. This case is one of the eases related to United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839, 116 S.Ct. 2432, 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996). In Winstar, the Supreme Court ruled that passage of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub.L. No. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183 (1989) (“FIRREA”) (codified as amended in various sections of 12 § U.S.C.), cause
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992-02-27 · Published · cited 3× · 138 B.R. 15; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2495
138 B.R. 15 (1992) MERRITT LOGAN, INC. v. FLEMING FOODS OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. In re MERRITT LOGAN, INC., Debtor in Possession. Civ. A. No. 91-7401, Bankruptcy No. 87-00550F, Adv. No. 91-0805. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 27, 1992. *16 *17 Lawrence Corson, Corso
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009-08-14 · Published · cited 2× · 410 B.R. 270; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2218; 2009 WL 2512697
410 B.R. 270 (2009) In re Mikki Sue GRAY, Debtor. William B. Logan, Jr., Plaintiff, v. WMC Mortgage Corp., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-52470. Adversary No. 08-2136. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division, at Columbus. August 14, 2009. *271 Kenneth M. Richards, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff. Philomen
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993-05-19 · Published · cited 1× · 120 Or. App. 512; 852 P.2d 960; 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 786
LEESON, J. Defendant appeals from a judgment for payment due on a contract for the sale of goods. It assigns error to the trial court for (1) striking its defense and counterclaim for breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose; (2) instructing the jury that, as a matter of law, three particular documents constituted a fully integrated contract; and (3) not allowing one of its witnesses to testify about his
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988-12-16 · Published · cited 26× · 861 F.2d 859; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17087; 1988 WL 126399
861 F.2d 859 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Jonathan LOGAN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 87-1774. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Dec. 16, 1988. Sidney Powell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Marvin Collins, U.S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant. E.X. Martin,
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989-11-30 · Published · cited 68× · 890 F.2d 1112; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17822; 1989 WL 143466
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. The court on its own motion has determined to consider en banc whether the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. §§ 11707 and 10730, 1 preempts state common law remedies for negligent damage to goods shipped by common carrier. After reviewing the law on this subj
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994-10-03 · Published · cited 0× · 865 F. Supp. 533; 25 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20403; 39 ERC (BNA) 1965; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14125
ORDER WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge. This matter is before the court on a motion to reconsider which was filed by the third-party defendants on August 1, 1994 1. The parties completed briefing the motion on September 30, 1994. The third-party defendants have also filed, in the alternative, a motion for certification of interlocutory appeal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 129