Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Zavala-Rivas”
Rodriguez-Mendez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Kellerpublic domain
Case: 23-40338 Document: 115-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/09/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-40338 FILED
Corpus-De La Riva v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F. 3d 1101 (third judgment) and 1102 (first and second judgments).
United States v. Ramos-Carreraspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1747 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. ÁNGEL RAMOS-CARRERAS, Appellant, Defendant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge] Before
United States v. Maberrypublic domain
ORDER . Daniel P. Jordan III, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendant Walter Maberry,. II, is charged with being a convicted felon .in the possession of a firearm. But he believes the search that produced the gun violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, so he now moves to suppress the evidence recovered during the search. His motion was heard during an evidentiary hearing on May 24, 20
United States v. Lizardi-Maldonadopublic domain
*1287MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF DETENTION AND RELEASE ON CONDITIONS EVELYN J. FURSE, United States Magistrate Judge The Court GRANTS Defendant Juan Lizardi-Maldonado’s Motion to Review Detention. Upon reopening the detention hearing,'’the Court finds the Government has not shown by a preponderance of
United States v. Laureano-Perezpublic domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Defendants Juan Laureano-Pérez (“Juan”), Jeffrey Cummings-Ávila (“Cummings”), and Christopher Laureano-Pérez (“Christopher”) 1 (collectively, “Defendants”) were convicted of various narcotics possession, firearm, and conspiracy charges arising out of their participation in an illicit drug organiz
United States v. Matthew Massipublic domain
LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: Matthew Joseph Massi was arrested and charged with possession of marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. He moved to suppress evidence uncovered during his detention by law enforcement officers. The district court denied the motion. Massi later entered a conditional plea agreement, preserving his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to supp
United States v. Bristol-Martirpublic domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. This case involves an investigation into corruption in the Puerto Rico Police Department and the subsequent convictions of four police officers who were willing to escort cocaine to various locations throughout Puerto Rico. After a jury trial, the defendant-appellants Samuel BristolMártir (“Bristol”), Omar Marrero-Cruz (“Marrero”), Carlos Oliveras-González (“Oliveras”), and Francisco Santiago-Albino (
United States v. Lopez-Solispublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-10059 v. D.C. No. CR-02-01265-RCC ALFREDO LOPEZ-SOLIS, aka Alfredo Lopez, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from
Rivas v. United Statespublic domain
RUIZ, Associate Judge, concurring. This appeal raises the question of what evidence will suffice to prove the necessary element of intent under the doctrine of constructive possession. Specifically, we are concerned with whether proximity to contraband in plain view in an automobile is sufficient to sustain an inference of intent beyond a reasonable doubt, and, if not, what other facts are required to sustain
United States v. Odompublic domain
*1292 NESBITT, District Judge: Defendants-Appellants Brandy Boone and Alan Odom appeal from their criminal convictions for conspiracy to commit arson and for conspiracy to use fire to commit a felony prosecutable in a United States court. Both Defendants challenge their conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 844
United States v. Odompublic domain
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ____________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 31, 2
Rogers v. City of San Antoniopublic domain
392 F.3d 758 Anthony ROGERS; et al., Plaintiffs,Anthony Rogers; Richard Morales; Ventura Calderon, Jr.; Andrew L. Almazan; Robert J. De Leon; Rolando Cesar Garza; Robert A. Gearhart; Isidro Medina, Jr.; Timothy L. Menchaca; Emilio M. Montes; Bruce R. Moore; Nathaniel Oakman; Antonio Rivas; Jeffery J. Zavala; and George W. Randall, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 03-50588.
447 F.3d 1201 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Alfredo LOPEZ-SOLIS, aka Alfredo Lopez, Defendant-Appellant. No. 03-10059. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued March 11, 2004. Submitted May 12, 2006. Filed May 19, 2006. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Alfre
Rogers v. City of San Antoniopublic domain
DENNIS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs, fifteen employees of the San Antonio fire department, who are members of either the United States military reserves or the National Guard (“Uniformed Services”), brought this civil action under the Uniform Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (“USERRA”) 1 against the C
Adnan Shroff v. Jefferson Sessions, IIIpublic domain
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Adnan Shroff petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") deciding that his conviction of online solicitation of a minor is an aggravated felony that subjects him to removal. Because Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions , --- U.S. ----,
Dominguez-Rivera v. Hazelwoodpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1747 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. ÁNGEL RAMOS-CARRERAS, Appellant, Defendant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge] Before
Rogers v. City of San Antonio, Texaspublic domain
211 F.Supp.2d 829 (2002) Anthony ROGERS, Richard Morales, Ventura Calderon, Jr., Robert J. DeLeon, Rolando Cesar Garza, Robert A. Gearhart, Isidro Medina, Jr., Timothy L. Menchaca, Emilio M. Montes, Bruce R. Moore, Nathaniel Oakman, Mark James Olson, Antonio Rivas, Jeffrey J. Zavala, and George W. Randall, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS, Defendant. Civil Action No. SA-99-CA-1110 OG. United S
Craig Lyons v. Conagra Foods Packaged Foods Lpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I