⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Zarco”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-01-24 · Published · cited 42× · 24 F.4th 477
Case: 21-40060 Document: 00516177719 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/24/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 24, 2022
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996-07-05 · Published · cited 0× · 95 F.3d 48; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19723; 1996 WL 405841
95 F.3d 48 U.S.v.Zarco-Arenas* NO. 94-11149 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. July 05, 1996 Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 4:94-CR-93-Y 1 DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019-02-07 · Published · cited 0× · 915 F.3d 525
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Miguel Zarco of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute a controlled substance. The district court 1 sentenced him to the mandatory minimum sentence of 120 months' imprisonment and five years of supervised release. Zarco appeals his convictio
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016-09-06 · Published · cited 10× · 836 F.3d 899; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 16334; 2016 WL 4608138
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Ismael Miranda-Zarco pled guilty to two conspiracies: to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A); and to commit money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (a)(1)(B)(I) and (h). He appeals the addition of one criminal-history point under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this co
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-03-19 · Published · cited 0× · 225 F. App'x 589
MEMORANDUM ** Ismael Perez-Zarco appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful re-entry by a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Perez-Zarco contends that the district court erred in sentencing him because it *590
In re Zarcopublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014-03-25 · Published · cited 3× · 507 B.R. 247; 2014 WL 1202570; 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 1207
Order Sanctioning Attorney Richard G. Fonfrias JACQUELINE P. COX, Bankruptcy Judge. I. Facts and Background On June 20, 2013 (“Petition Date”), Debtor, Daniel Adam Zarco, Sr. (“Debt- or”), sought bankruptcy relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Debtor’s attorney Richard G. Fonfrias has filed three motions for damages herein. On July 1, 2013, he filed a Motion for Damages <
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-04-12 · Published · cited 0× · 373 F. App'x 815
MEMORANDUM ** Andreas Vasquez-Zarco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the BIA’s determination of continuous physical presence. Landin-Zavala
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-04-12 · Published · cited 0× · 373 F. App'x 815
MEMORANDUM ** Andreas Vasquez-Zarco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the BIA’s determination of continuous physical presence. Landin-Zavala
Zarco v. Goldingpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-04-24 · Published · cited 0× · 229 F. App'x 506
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Juan Daniel Zarco appeals pro se from the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging defendants violated his constitutional rights by subjecting him to excessive force, denying him medical care, interfering with his access to courts, and denying him due process in disciplinary proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We r
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-07-01 · Published · cited 0× · 337 F. App'x 675
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions for review, Odilon Solano Zarco and his family, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal, and the BIA’s order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S
Zarco v. Burtpublic domain
District Court, S.D. California · 2004-12-29 · Published · cited 1× · 355 F. Supp. 2d 1168; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27488; 2004 WL 3111055
355 F.Supp.2d 1168 (2004) Juan Daniel ZARCO, CDC # K-41619, Plaintiff, v. J. BURT, et al., Defendants. No. 03 CV 1911-BTM(BLM). United States District Court, S.D. California. December 29, 2004. Juan Daniel Zarco, In Pro Per, for Plaintiff. G. Michael German, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Defendants.
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017-10-27 · Published · cited 3× · 297 F. Supp. 3d 1321
CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendants, Noadiam USA, LLC; Steven Neiger; Dean David Neiger; Emma *1323Hazzan; and Global Assets Gem, S.A., seek to compel arbitration of this action under the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the "Convention") and its implementing le
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-07-01 · Published · cited 0× · 337 F. App'x 675
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions for review, Odilon Solano Zarco and his family, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal, and the BIA’s order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012-11-06 · Published · cited 62× · 700 F.3d 1245
Case: 11-14049 Date Filed: 11/06/2012 Page: 1 of 35 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ Nos. 11-14049; 11-14227; 11-14310; 11-14311 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-20196-JLK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
District Court, S.D. California · 1960-09-16 · Published · cited 4× · 187 F. Supp. 371; 1960 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4227
187 F.Supp. 371 (1960) UNITED STATES of America, Libelant, v. THE Fishing Vessel ZARCO, Respondent, California Electric Works, Claimant. No. 2320-SD-C. United States District Court S. D. California, S. D. September 16, 1960. Laughlin E. Waters, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Keith R. Ferguson, Sp. *372 Asst. to Atty. Gen., Grayd
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-10-18 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 950; 125 S. Ct. 366
543 U.S. 950 CAZARES-ALVARADOv.UNITED STATES;TABAREZ-RAMIREZ, AKA RODRIGUEZv.UNITED STATES;ZARCO FLORESv.UNITED STATES;CONTRERASv.UNITED STATES;VIDALv.UNITED STATES;GARZAv.UNITED STATES;DIAZv.UNITED STATES;MANCILLA REALv.UNITED STATES; andDAMON COURVILLEv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-6370. Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-10-18 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 950
C. A. 5th Cir; Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025-01-13 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 22-11084 Document: 163-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-11084 FILED
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024-11-26 · Published · cited 2× · 122 F.4th 71
22-639 United States v. Davis United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Submitted: February 5, 2024 Decided: November 26, 2024 No. 22-639 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-01-12 · Published · cited 1× · 90 F.4th 832
Case: 23-30053 Document: 00517032045 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/12/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-30053 FILED