Cases

979 F.2d 208 U.S.v.Yeagin* NO. 92-8117 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Nov 02, 1992 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tex. 2

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge. Bobby Joe Yeagin appeals his convictions for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, use of a firearm in connection with a drug trafficking offense, and possession of a firearm as a convicted felon. Yeagin contends that the district court erred by admitting evidence of Yeag-in’s nine prior felony convictions. Because we conclude that the preju

Case: 19-50832 Document: 00515571219 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/18/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 18, 2020

Case: 18-31213 Document: 00515445614 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/09/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-31213

Case: 16-41057 Document: 00514430933 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2018 REVISED April 16, 2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-41057

KING, Circuit Judge: *905 Eligio San Miguel Mendez was one of the targets of a gang and narcotics investigation. Officers secured a search warrant for his residence but were unable to arrange for a SWAT team to assist them. As a result, they decided to wait for him to leave the residence bef

CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: A jury found Michael Eric Wallace (“Wallace”) and Derek Lee Blocker (“Blocker”) (collectively “Appellants”) guilty on all counts of an indictment charging them with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 or more grams of methamphetamine (“meth”) pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846. Appellants were also convicted, o

Case: 12-11279 Document: 00512491466 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/07/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 7, 2014 No. 12-11279 Lyle W.

*243 HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge. Albert Guzman was convicted, following a stipulated bench trial, of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Because the district court expressly declined to make factual findings that may have had a determinative im

Case: 12-11279 Document: 00512491466 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/07/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 7, 2014 No. 12-11279 Lyle W.

624 F.3d 215 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Geechie Devain TEMPLETON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-50589. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. October 15, 2010. *217 Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Elizabeth Berenguer (argued), Asst. U.S. Attys., San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Thomas S. Morg

553 F.3d 821 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafi Wali McCALL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-51456. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 19, 2008. *823 Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Elizabeth Berenguer (argued), San Antonio, TX, for U.S. Thomas S. Morgan (argued), Law Office

400 S.W.2d 914 (1966) Bobby Joe YEAGIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 39282. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. February 23, 1966. Rehearing Denied April 20, 1966. Fred A. Carver, Joe B. Goodwin (on appeal only), Beaumont, for appellant. W. C. Lindsay, Dist. Atty., John R. DeWitt, Asst. Dist. Atty., Beaumont, and Leon B. Do

CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge: Appellant Rodney Santiago (“Santiago”) appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress firearms discovered in a search of. his residence and a written statement, which resulted in his conditional guilty-plea conviction for two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1)

REVISED DECEMBER 17, 2001 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________ m 00-20407 _______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, VE

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Milton Watson appeals his conviction of illegal possession of firearms. Concluding that the conviction is based on evidence obtained in possible violation of the Fourth Amendment, we vacate and remand for further proceedings to determine whether such a violation occurred. I. Undercover officers de la

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant-appellant Shawnee Louise Sehinnell (Schin-nell) pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, while preserving her right to appeal the district court’s denial of her motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds. We affirm the denial of the motion to dismiss. We vacate Schinnell’s sentence on other grounds and remanded for resenten

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ___________________ Nos. 94-11155 & 95-10213 ___________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHAWNEE LOUISE SCHINNELL, Defendant-Appellant. __________

STEWART, Circuit Judge: This case involves the issue of whether a suspect’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated when police conducted a pat-down search of his outer clothing and subsequently arrested him for possession of crack cocaine, which the officer could identify by feeling through the defendant’s clothing. Finding no error in the district court’s denial of defendant’s m

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 93-9089 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES ROBERT BENBROOK, JR. and STEVEN DWAIN SEXTON, Defendants-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District C