Cases

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant William Yager appeals from the sentence imposed on December 9, 2005, in the Northern District of New York (David N. Hurd, Judge), following Yager’s plea of guilty to charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and to launder the proceeds of the fraudulent scheme. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and issues on appeal. For the following reasons, we a

657 F.2d 270 U. S.v.Yager 80-5154 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 4/22/81 1 W.D.Ky. AFFIRMED

Opinion COOK, Judge: This appeal involves the validity of a random jury selection program1 established by the convening authority, 1st Infantry Division and Fort Riley, Fort Riley, Kansas. In accordance with procedures promulgated by a local directive [FR Circular No. 27—10-1 (Oct. 1, 1973)],2 names for a list of prospective jurors were selected fr

Judge FELDER, dissenting: The findings of guilty, to the charges which the appellant pleaded not guilty, should be invalidated because aliens were systematically excluded from serving as court members. Paragraph 5a(4), Fort Riley Circular 27-10-1, dated 7 March 1974, provided that an individual must be a citizen of the United States to qualify as a court member. This citizenship requirement is an unlawful depa

500 F.2d 1403 U. S.v.Yager 73-2247 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 7/2/74 1 E.D.Ky. AFFIRMED

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. The defendant, Mickie Jo Yager, pleaded guilty to one count of possessing and attempting to possess pseudoephedrine with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(c)(2) and 846. She claimed she was a minor participant in the manufacturing scheme and requested a downward adjustment. The District Court declined to

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 02-3186NI _____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * On Appeal from the United v. * States District Cou

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. THOMAS J. YAGER and DEBORAH JO YAGER, Appellees. No. 4D2023-2310 [April 16, 2025] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Da

DAN M. LEE, Presiding Justice, dissenting: Although Mary Frances Yager was not his “legal wife” at the time of M.L. Yager’s death, she is his “surviving spouse” as defined by Section 71-3-3(n) of the Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Act (“Act”). Therefore, she is entitled to the benefits afforded a “surviving spouse” pursuant to the Act. However, in denying her the benefits provided by

Honorable James A. Soto, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are motions for summary judgment filed by Wilshire Insurance Company ("Wilshire"), Girard *934Insurance Services, Ira Girard and Mary Ann Girard (collectively referred to as "Girard"), and Patrick Yager and Javier Lopez (collectively referred to as "Yager"

BURKE, Chief Justice. [¶1] Appellant, Christopher Yage1 chal'lenges his conviction of third-degreé sexual assault, He contends Wyoming's sexual assault statute does not apply to sexual contact between probatlon officers and probatloners We affirm - ISSUE [T2] Appellant presents one issue which we have restated:

OPINION OF THE COURT HECKER, Judge: A general court-martial composed of a military judge convicted the appellant, consistent with his pleas, of one specification of knowingly using an interactive computer service for the carriage in interstate commerce of obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy pictures or other matter of indecent character, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1462, as incorporated under Article 134

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1173 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1174 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NO

UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Brent A. CAMPBELL, Captain U.S. Air Force, Appellant No. 11-0403 Crim. App. No. 37460 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued October 25, 2011 Decided March 1, 2012 BAKER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ERDMANN and

UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Daniel A. ZARBATANY Jr., Airman First Class U.S. Air Force, Appellant No. 11-0165 Crim. App. No. 37448 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued April 21, 2011 Decided July 6, 2011 BAKER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in

*579OPINION OF THE COURT WEISS, Judge: In accordance with her pleas of guilty to one charge and seven specifications of wrongful distribution of oxycodone, methadone and methamphetamine; and wrongful use of oxycodone, methadone, methamphetamine and heroin, in violation of Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a, a general court-martial composed of officer m

PER CURIAM: We consider whether the preadmission of two drug testing reports violated the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. 1 In light of United States v. Blazier, 69 M.J. 218 (C.A.A.F.2010) (Blazier II), we find error under the Confrontation Clause and remand to the Un