Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Witcher”
United States v. Witcherpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Wayne Earl Witcher has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Witcher has filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the record, and Witcher’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. The reco
Witcher v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Witcher v. United Statespublic domain
541 U.S. 1037 WITCHERv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-9727. Supreme Court of United States. May 3, 2004. 1 C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 90 Fed. Appx. 386.
Witcher v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Witcher v. United Statespublic domain
538 U.S. 1025 WITCHERv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-9948. Supreme Court of United States. May 5, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. 2 C.A. 6th
Witcher v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Witcher v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Witcher v. Prelesnikpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Witcher v. Prelesnikpublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Witcher v. Witcherpublic domain
Super. Ct. Pa. Certio-rari denied.
Witcher v. Westphalpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Murray Witcher appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in his employer’s favor in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Witcher v. Westphal, No. CA-00-2676-RDB (D.Md. filed Mar. 22, 2004 & entered Mar. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument becaus
Witcher v. Medtronic, Inc.public domain
TRANSFER ORDER D. LOWELL JENSEN, Acting Chairman. Before the entire Panel *: Plaintiff in an action pending in the Middle District of Alabama moves, pursuant to Rule 7.4, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), to vacate our order conditionally transferring the action to the District of Minnesota for inclusion in MDL No. 1726. Defendant Medtronic, Inc., did not respond to plaintiffs motion.
Witcher v. Witcherpublic domain
Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
Witcher v. Witcherpublic domain
Super. Ct. Pa. Certio-rari denied.
State v. Witcherpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Witcher, 2012-Ohio-4141.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 26111 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE THOMAS WITCHER
Witcher v. Sodexho, Inc.public domain
478 F.Supp.2d 663 (2007) George WITCHER, Plaintiff, v. SODEXHO, INC., Defendant. Civ. No. 05-205-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. March 26, 2007. *664 *665 *666 George Witcher, Wilmington, DE, Pro se Plaintiff. Sarah Elizabeth DiLuzio,
Witcher v. Witcherpublic domain
433 Pa. Superior Ct. 14 (1994) 639 A.2d 1187 Murray H. WITCHER, Jr., Appellee, v. Phyllis J. Herrmann WITCHER, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued January 20, 1994. Filed April 4, 1994. *15 Phyllis J. Herrmann Witcher, pro se. Eugene J. Malady, Media, for appellee. Before WIEAND
Texas State Board of Pharmacy v. Witcherpublic domain
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING In its initial appellate briefing, the Board’s principal arguments were that (1) the Board’s order did not contain or adopt a “rule” at all, and (2) if it did, the rule fell within one of the narrow circumstances in which ad hoc rulemaking is permitted. The Board has now filed a motion for rehearing raising wholly new issues and arguments. Although we conclude that the motion for rehearing does not require that
Robert Alan Witcher v. Valery W. Early, IIIpublic domain
GILMAN, Circuit Judge: The question in this case is whether a court may take into account a debtor’s ability to pay his or her debts in determining whether “the totality of the circumstances ... of the debtor’s financial situation demonstrates abuse” of chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(3)(B). We hold that the court may do so. The judgment of the distric
Witcher v. City of Greenvillepublic domain
Order Amy Johnstone complained to the local police that Ronald Witcher had called her repeatedly, and visited her home, in a manner Johnstone deemed threatening, and that Witcher persisted after Johnstone told him to desist. Debra Keserauskis, a sergeant of the Greenville, Illinois, police, arrested Witcher for harassment by telephone, in violation of 720 ILCS 135/1-1. Asserting that Keserauskis had misunderstood the requirements of t