Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Case No. 1:94-cr-296-11 (RCL) DAVID E. WINSTON, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In 1995, defendant David Winston was sentenced to an aggregate term of life plus sixty years’ imprisonment for distributing significant quantities of crack cocaine and for murdering two rival drug dealers. ECF No. 151. Now, twenty-six years later, Winston moves for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(

USCA4 Appeal: 23-4544 Doc: 46 Filed: 04/08/2025 Pg: 1 of 20 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-4544 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. WINSTON SYLVESTER OLIVER, II, Defendant – Appellant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:95-cr-7-RCL-1 DAVID E. WINSTON, JR., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In the summer of 1993, defendant David E. Winston, Jr., murdered two rival crack cocaine dealers in the District of Columbia. Mot. al 5—6, ECF No. 30; Opp’n at 2-3, ECF No. 44, After he was indicted for those crimes, he pleaded guilty in federal District Court in February 1995 to one count of distribution o

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0361p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Ap

MEMORANDUM OPINION NORMAN K. MOON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This habeas case is before the Court in an unusual posture. Citing Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015) (“Johnson IF), Defendant filed his petition on February 10, 2016, which the parties briefed. (Dkts. 58, 62, 64). I issued an opinion (dkt. 65, available at 2016 WL 2757451 (W.D.Va

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge GINSBURG. GINSBURG, Senior Circuit Judge: After the prosecutor repeatedly failed to meet his disclosure obligations, Winston MeCallum moved for and obtained a mistrial. Shortly before retrial the prosecutor belatedly disclosed yet more information that MeCallum had subpoenaed before the first trial. Arg

611 F.3d 919 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Charles E. WINSTON, Appellant. No. 09-3004. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 14, 2010. Filed: July 19, 2010. *920 Laine Cardarella, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Lajuana M. Counts, Asst.

ORDER Javail Winston pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to one count of bank rob*595bery, admitting that a bank teller handed over $1,540 after he gave her a note threatening to kill her if she refused. See 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). The district court sentenced him to 175 months’ imprisonment, well above his applicable guidelines range of 46 to 57 months. Winston filed

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Levi H. Winston appeals the district court’s order denying Winston’s motion for reconsideration of the order finding him ineligible for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

ORDER Javail Winston pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to one count of bank rob*595bery, admitting that a bank teller handed over $1,540 after he gave her a note threatening to kill her if she refused. See 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). The district court sentenced him to 175 months’ imprisonment, well above his applicable guidelines range of 46 to 57 months. Winston filed

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Levi H. Winston appeals the district court’s order denying Winston’s motion for reconsideration of the order finding him ineligible for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

492 F.Supp.2d 15 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Charles WINSTON, Jr. No. 04-CR-30026-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 25, 2007. *16 David P. Hoose, Katz, Sasson, Hoose & Turnbull, Springfield, MA, for Charles Winston, Jr. Ariane D. Vuono, Thomas J. O'Connor, Jr., United States Attorney's Of

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. This is an interlocutory appeal by the government under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3731 from an order of the district court suppressing evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant. For the reasons stated hereinafter, we reverse. The district court concluded that the search warrant was based on information that was illegally obtained by government agents incident to defendant Charles Winston’s

PER CURIAM: Monte Decarlos Winston seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 225

ORDER Marlon Winston pleaded guilty to receiving child pornography in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). As a condition of the plea agreement, the government agreed to recommend a three-point reduction in his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, provided that Winston exhibited “conduct consistent with the acceptance of responsibility.” While he was free on bond and awaiting sentencing, however, Winston was

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-3782 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court fo

MEMORANDUM * Defendant Darryl Tracy Winston timely appeals his conviction of and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 1. The district court applied the correct legal standard under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). See United States v. Steele, 298 F.3d 906 (9th Cir.) (reviewin

OPINION COLE, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellants Kwan Andre Winston and Tirrell Clemmons appeal their convictions and sentences following a *291jury trial for several crimes relating to cocaine trafficking and a resulting murder. Winston and Clemmons were tried together in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Sout

ORDER The government has moved for clarification as to whether the vacating of the conviction of Winston Cunningham, United States v. Casas et al., 356 F.3d 104, 123-24, 2004 U.S.App. LEXIS 763, at *67 (1st Cir.2004), results in entry of a judgment of acquittal of Cunningham or whether the government is free to retry Cunningham. The defendant has replied only that this

OPINION OF THE COURT ROTH, Circuit Judge. Defendant Winston Dyer appeals his judgment of conviction for unlawful reentry into the United States after a previous deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that the District Court erred in *465 denying his motion to