Cases

PER CURIAM. Terry Keith Wendt appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Upon denial of the motion, Wendt entered a conditional plea of guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). After conviction, Wendt was further charged with, and pleaded guilty to, violation of supervised release due to possession of a

BAUER, Circuit Judge. James Wendt was charged with possession with the intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He filed a motion to quash his arrest and suppress the evidence obtained during the search of his car, which was denied. Thereafter, Wendt entered a conditional guilty plea. The denial of his motion to suppress is the subject of this appeal. W

*717CHAPTER 7 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Erik P. Kimball, Judge THIS MATTER came before the Court for hearing on November 25, 2013 upon the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 23] (the “Motion”). For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the Motion and enter judgment in favor

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2458 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Brad Wendt Defendant - Appel

347 F.Supp. 647 (1972) The UNITED STATES v. John James WENDT. Crim. No. 27303. United States District Court, N. D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. September 15, 1972. *648 John James Wendt, pro se. John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., Eugene A. Medori, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for defendant. ORDER E

381 B.R. 217 (2007) In re Dennis A. WENDT, Debtor. Sharon Anderson, Plaintiff, v. Dennis A. Wendt, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-44958-H3-7. Adversary No. 05-3941. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. November 20, 2007. *218 *219 *220</

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER RANDOLPH BAXTER, Chief Judge. In this adversary proceeding, Ryan Cramer, a co-defendant in the above-referenced adversary, seeks dismissal of the Plaintiffs’ amended complaint against him. Cramer contends that the Plaintiffs, Joseph A. Keichel and Shelley Keichel (“Kei-chels”) commenced a state court action in July of 2003 alleging a similar cause of action. He m

*1550Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.

Opinion issued July 25, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00128-CV ——————————— LAUREL WENDT, Appellant V. EVALYN WENDT MOORE, AMILEE WENDT, AND JACKIE WENDT

355 B.R. 769 (2006) In re David W. WENDT, Sr. and Denise K. Wendt, Debtors. Auto Mart, Inc., Plaintiff, v. David W. Wendt, Defendant. Bankruptcy Case No. 05-42042-drd, Adversary No. 06-4087. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri. November 13, 2006. As Amended November 28, 2006. *770

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

*967C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

540 U.S. 1018 WENDTv.REHNQUIST, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. No. 03-530. Supreme Court of United States. November 17, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 7th Cir. 2 Certior

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

539 U.S. 905 Wendtv.Wakefield. No. 02-9811. Supreme Court of United States. June 2, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 58 Fed. Appx. 596.</

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

543 U.S. 966 WENDTv.RAINEY, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, ET AL. No. 04-6313. Supreme Court of United States. November 1, 2004. 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 98 Fed. Appx. 303.