Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1865 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:22-cr-00149- BLW-1 v. TYLER JAY WATSON, OPINION Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court

OPINION AND ORDER James P. Jones, United States District Judge The United States instituted this action against defendánts Joe Watson (“Watson”) and his wife Betty Watson in order to collect federal payroll tax assessments. Count I of the Complaint seeks to reduce to judgment the tax assessments made against Watson, and Count II seeks to foreclose federal tax liens against real property owned by Watson and h

JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. On April 2, 2013, New York City Police Officer Christopher Vaccaro, while searching for a robbery suspect named Chauncey Butler, spotted defendant Severne Watson. Allegedly perceiving a general physical resemblance between Watson and Butler, the officer exited his patrol car to inquire about Watson’s identity. During the course of the inquiry that f

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Trevor A. Watson (“Watson”) brings this federal habeas corpus motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, seeking postconviction relief from his conviction and sentence for witness tampering. In December 2010, Watson was found guilty of one count of attempting to kill a federal witness in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(a)(1)(A) an

HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Vincent Watson was convicted by a jury of five counts *1222 relating to the cultivation and distribution of marijuana. He raises three challenges to his conviction on appeal: (1) that his second counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to adequ

HOWARD, Circuit Judge. Trevor Watson was convicted, after a four-day jury trial, of attempting to kill a federal witness with intent to prevent testimony and communication with law enforcement, see 18 U.S.C. § 1512(a)(1)(A), (C), for which he was sentenced to 360 months’ imprisonment. He appeals the

650 F.3d 1084 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcellus J. WATSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-1169. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 16, 2011. Filed: August 16, 2011. *1086 David R. Mercer, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Springfield, MO, argued (Raymond C. Conr

633 F.3d 929 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Edward WATSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-50666. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted November 4, 2010.[*] Filed February 23, 2011. *930 Ami Sheth, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, f

Chief Judge EFFRON delivered the opinion of the Court. A general court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone convicted Appellant, pursuant to her pleas, of larceny of government property and fraud against the United States, in violation of Articles 121 and 132, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 932 (2006). The military judge sentenced Appellant to a dismissal, confinement f

787 F.Supp.2d 667 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. D-1 Lamonte WATSON, Jr., D-2 Isaac Denel Meeks, D-3 Shawn Renard Smith, D-4 Timothy Grayson, D-5 Antonio Watson, D-6 Hansel Williams, D-7 Terrance Alexander, D-9 Duane Williams, D-10 Damichael Washington, D-12 Lemetrius Knapp, D-13 Roquan Wesley, Defendants. Case No. 10-20388. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

582 F.3d 974 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Deandre WATSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-10385. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 13, 2009. Filed September 23, 2009. *977 Joseph P. Russoniello, United States Attorney, Barbara J. Valliere, William Fren

525 F.3d 583 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie WATSON, Anthony Redmond, and Tracy Redmond, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 06-2680, 06-2963, 06-3114. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 22, 2007. Decided May 13, 2008. *585 Renato Mariotti (argued), Office of th

498 F.3d 429 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kerry WATSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-6021. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: July 24, 2007. Decided and Filed: August 15, 2007. ARGUED: Kim A. Tollison, Federal Defender Services, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellant. Tracee J. Plowell, Assistant United Sta

Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-5-2007 USA v. Watson Precedential or Non-Precedential:

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0316p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Pl

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 06-2680, 06-2963 & 06-3114 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIE WATSON, ANTHONY REDMOND, and TRACY REDMOND, Defendants-Appellants. ____________ Appeals from the United States Dist

385 F.Supp.2d 534 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. Samuel WATSON. No. CRIM.A.04-392. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 29, 2005. *535 Catherine C. Henry, Federal Defenders, Philadelphia, PA, for Samuel Watson. Karen L. Grigsby, U.S. Attorney's Office, Philadelphia, PA, for United States of America.<

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Timothy Watson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained by police officers who searched his apartment without knocking and announcing their presence before entering. Because we conclude that the officers executing the search warrant were not confronted by exigent circumstances sufficient to justify their entering the apartment without knocking and announcing

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS. ROGERS, Circuit Judge. The principal question in this appeal is whether the prosecutor’s peremptory challenge of two visually impaired (“blind”) jurors was lawful under the rule of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). Watson contends that the rule es

OPINION OF THE COURT LOVE, Judge: Court members convicted appellant of one specification of violating a lawful order and two specifications of false official statement. Article 92, 107, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 907. His approved sentence was a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 6 months, and reduction to E-l. The appellant claims that the military judge erred by granting the government’s peremptory cha