Cases

PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Charlotte Desiree Waters has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Waters has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant por

CCA 20111073. Appellant’s second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for. grant of review granted, up to and including January 24, 2014, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

CCA 20111073. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 9, 2014.

648 F.3d 1114 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Geary Wayne WATERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50256. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 2011. Filed August 19, 2011. *1115 Sean K. Kennedy, Federal Public Defender and Carlton F. Gunn (argued), Deputy F

627 F.3d 345 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Briana WATERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-30222. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 5, 2010. Filed September 15, 2010. Amended December 6, 2010. *348 Dennis P. Riordan and Donald M. Horgan

622 F.3d 1075 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Briana WATERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-30222. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 5, 2010. Filed September 15, 2010. *1077 Dennis P. Riordan and Donald M. Horgan, Riordan and Horgan, San Francisco, CA,

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dennis Merrimon Waters appeals the district court’s orders denying a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dist

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dennis Merrimon Waters appeals the district court’s orders denying a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dist

MEMORANDUM ** Brian Dickie Waters appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 130-month sentence for distributing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(vin). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Waters’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of rec

PER CURIAM: Michael O’Neal Waters, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 22

Opinions of the United 2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-12-2002 USA v. Waters Precedential or Non-Precedentia

MEMORANDUM ** Geary Wayne Waters, Jr. appeals his sentence imposed following convictions for possession of cocaine base with the intent to distribute, and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, both in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. We review a district court’s legal interpretation of

ORDER Kenneth B. Waters, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment denying *351his motion for a new trial and for relief from judgment filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(a) and 60(b). This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 19-CF-0235 ANTHONY ANTWONE WATERS, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APP

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 19-CF-0235 ANTHONY ANTWONE WATERS, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APP

71 F.3d 876 U.S.v.Waters* NO. 95-40301 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Nov 06, 1995 Appeal From: E.D.Tex., No. 6:94-CR-48-(2) 1 AFFIRMED.

81 F.3d 157 U.S.v.Waters** NO. 95-50256 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Feb 29, 1996 Appeal From: W.D.Tex., No. SA-94-CR-342-1 1 DISMISSED.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1887 ___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee, v. Garrett Waters, llllll

51 F.3d 1046 U.S.v.Waters* NO. 95-50074 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Mar 31, 1995 Appeal From: W.D.Tex., No. 94-CR-342-1 1 DISMISSED.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7240 Doc: 68 Filed: 03/30/2023 Pg: 1 of 13 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7240 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. THOMAS BRADFORD WATERS, Defendant – Appellant.