Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Stewart Douglas Waterhouse appeals pro se the denial of his motion for declaratory judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Waterhouse contends that he was denied his right to counsel on both direct appeal and collateral attack. He then discusses the alleged errors that occurred prior to his guilty plea and on appeal. The district court corr

26 U.S.C. § 6672; Failure to Pay Tax; Responsible Person; Willful Conduct; Liability for Penalty TRIAL OPINION FIRESTONE, Judge In this case, plaintiff Douglas Waterhouse (“Mi-. Waterhouse”) seeks a refund of trust fund recovery penalties assessed and partially paid for employment taxes owed to the United States (“the government”

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Application for stay, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, granted, and the Montana Supreme Court’s December 30, 2011, decision in case No. DA 11-0081 is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall termi­nate automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certio-­rari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied. Same case below, 82 So. 3d 84.

Sup. Ct. Ark. [Cer-­tiorari granted, ante, p. 941.] Motion of Michigan et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument denied.

874 F.Supp. 5 (1994) Robert L. WATERHOUSE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 94-0676 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 22, 1994. *6 Tamara Y. Davis, Clinton, MD, for plaintiff. Barbara J. Valliere, Washington, DC, for defendants. MEM

132 F.2d 699 (1943) UNITED STATES v. WATERHOUSE et al. (two cases). No. 10104. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. January 6, 1943. Rehearing Denied March 2, 1943. Norman M. Littell, Asst. Atty. Gen., John J. Courtney, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., and Roger P. Marquis, John F. Cotter, and Wilma C. Martin, Attys., Dept. of Justice, all of Washington, D

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Certiorari, 320 U. S. 723, to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Per Curiam: Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court. Mr. Justice Jackson states that, the proceeding having been commenced, as the record shows, “under the instructions of the Attorney General” and the valuation for which the Government now contends appearing to have been fixed at the time when he held that office, he t

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

539 U.S. 958 Xu Liu et al.v.Price Waterhouse LLP et al. No. 02-1213. Supreme Court of United States. June 27, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 7th Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported b

804 N.E.2d 536 (2004) 208 Ill.2d 439 281 Ill.Dec. 571 Mark WEISS, Indiv. and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellee, v. WATERHOUSE SECURITIES, INC., Appellant. No. 95458. Supreme Court of Illinois. January 23, 2004. *537 Phil C. Neal, H. Nicholas Berberian, Terry D. We

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from dismissal of a class action by depositors in the Bank of Credit & Commerce International (“BCCI”). The issues we resolve involve timeliness of appeal, judicial recusal, the derivative nature of the depositors’ RICO claims, and the application of the Alien Tort Statute. We have jurisdiction over depositors’ claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

KRAMER, Associate Judge: Appellant, presumably seeking to avoid tax liability or other obligation possibly incurred based on a Department of Veterans *474Affairs (Department or VA) waiver of debt, appeals a March 28, 1991, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision which concluded that even though appellant had previously been granted a waiver of indebtedness,

Sup. Ct. Fla. Cer-tiorari denied.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Cer-tiorari denied.