Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVID L. HORAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Relator Misty Wall has filed a Motion to Compel Production of Documents (the “Motion to Compel”) from Defendants Vista Hospice Care, Inc. d/b/a VistaCare and Vista-Care, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants” or “VistaCare”), seeking an order that Vista-Care’s counsel produce to Relator any portion of a draft report that was

PER CURIAM. Richmond Wall seeks to appeal the district court’s order and opinion denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wall, No. CR-98-177-A (E.D. Va. filed Sept.

PICKERING, Circuit Judge: Before the court is the government’s appeal from the district court’s order granting defendant Richard Wall’s Fed. R.Crim.P. 33 motion for a new trial. We conclude that the district court abused its discretion when it granted the motion. I. Facts and Proceedings Wall was indicted on charges

USCA11 Case: 20-10730 Document: 167-1 Date Filed: 09/06/2024 Page: 1 of 38 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-10730 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Corey N. WALL, Specialist United States Army, Appellant No. 19-0143 Crim. App. No. 20160235 Argued January 14, 2020—Deci

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Corey N. WALL, Specialist United States Army, Appellant No. 19-0143 Crim. App. No. 20160235 Argued January 14, 2020—Deci

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE MORGAN’S OCTOBER 9, 1992 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GADOLA, District Judge. The court, pursuant to Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and LR 72.1(d)(2) (E.D.Mich. Jan. 1, 1992), has reviewed the magistrate judge’s October 9, 1992 report and recommendation. There were no objections filed thereto. After conducting a de novo </

0 IGINA - Jfn tbe Wniteb ~ tates ~ourt of jfeberal ~laitns No. 18-618T Filed: January 7, 2019 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * LYNDA LEE WALL, * * Plaintiff, * Pro Se Plaintiff; Motion to

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Carolyn Wall (“movant”) is a federal inmate currently confined at the USP Ha-zelton in West. Virginia. Movant timely filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (D.1.134) The government filed an answer in opposition. (D.I. 142) For the reasons discussed, the court will deny mov

*741 OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Ronald C. Wall, Jr. directly appeals his conviction for mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Wall’s conviction arose out of a scheme whereby he arranged for the theft of his motor-boat and then filed a claim for the the

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S AMENDED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Dkt. 41); VACATING THIS COURT’S SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 OPINION & ORDER (Dkt. 39); DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO VACATE HIS SENTENCE (Dkt. 31); AND GRANTING A CERTFICATE OF APPEALABIL-TIY MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge Defendant filed a motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Dkt. 31),

SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge, with whom Judge VANASKIE joins as to Part III, concurring in the judgment. I agree with the Majority that Wal-Mart may omit Trinity’s proposal from the company’s proxy materials. I write separately, however, for two reasons. First, while I agree with my colleagues that the proposal is excludable based on the ordinary business exclusion, I believe that the test that it has fashioned

60 B.R. 512 (1986) In re James Everett WALL, Claudette Jean Wall, Michael Anthony Zunter, Ellen Gene Zunter, Debtors. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. James Everett WALL, Claudette Jean Wall, Michael Anthony Zunter, Ellen Gene Zunter, Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 5-84-00272, 5-84-00307, Adv. No. 5-85-0003. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky. February 13, 19

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2800 ___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee, v. Howard R. Ross, III, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. ___________________________ No. 18-2877 ___________________________ United S

619 F.3d 152 (2010) Robert F. WALL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. Docket No. 10-2354-op. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Submitted: August 9, 2010. Decided: September 2, 2010. *153 Robert F. Wall, Sandstone, MN, pro se. Before RAGGI, WESLEY and LYNCH, Circuit Judges.<

WYNN, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we confront the issue of whether the federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 ("Hate Crimes Act"), 18 U.S.C. § 249 (a)(2), may be constitutionally applied to an unarmed assault of a victim engaged in commercial activity at his place of work. This appe

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7032 Doc: 34 Filed: 08/13/2026 Pg: 1 of 27 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-7032 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JAMES EVERETT FLOOD, III, a/k/a Junior, a/k/a Junebug, a/k/a Bug,

FULTON, Judge: A general court-martial, consisting of members with enlisted representation, convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of two specifications of rape and single specifications of violating a general order, adultery, indecent language, wrongful use of a steroid, assault with a dangerous weapon, and kidnapping in violation of Articles 92, 112a, 120, 128, and 13

MEMORANDUM * Ryan Jason Wall appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Wall moved to suppress methamphetamine found in a DHL parcel which had been intercepted by the Guam Drug Enforcement Agency, on the ground that the affidavit supporting the application for the search warrant was not supported by probable cause. The district court denied the motion, and Wall entered a conditional plea

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-498 No. COA21-419 Filed 19 July 2022 Richmond County, No. 20 CVS 473 DORIS WALL, PATRICIA SMITH, COREY DAVIS, MARIO ROBINSON, TIMOTHY SMITH, GLORIA GILLIAM, MICHAEL WADDELL, TERIA BOUKNIGHT, JUNE BARBOUR, EMMANUEL SMITH, DONQUIS JONES, DIANNE KIRKPATRICK, ASBURY FORTE, III, ARETHA