Cases

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Corey N. WALL, Specialist United States Army, Appellant No. 19-0143 Crim. App. No. 20160235 Argued January 14, 2020—Deci

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Corey N. WALL, Specialist United States Army, Appellant No. 19-0143 Crim. App. No. 20160235 Argued January 14, 2020—Deci

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S AMENDED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Dkt. 41); VACATING THIS COURT’S SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 OPINION & ORDER (Dkt. 39); DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO VACATE HIS SENTENCE (Dkt. 31); AND GRANTING A CERTFICATE OF APPEALABIL-TIY MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge Defendant filed a motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Dkt. 31),

CCA 20100174. Appellee’s motion to attach authenticated transcript of the post-trial Article 39(a), UCMJ, session in response to the Court order is granted.

CCA 20100174. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals and the record of trial, the Court notes that appellate counsel have referenced a post-trial Article 39(a), UCMJ, session at the court-martial where the military judge discussed a newly-discovered convening order. It is also noted that the record does not contain any transcript of that session. Accordingly, it is ordered that

CCA 20100174. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to August 10, 2012.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rodney Edward Wall appeals the district court’s order denying Wall’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wall, No

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rodney Edward Wall appeals the district court’s order denying Wall’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wall, No

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rodney Edward Wall seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appea

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rodney Edward Wall seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appea

MEMORANDUM * Ryan Jason Wall appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Wall moved to suppress methamphetamine found in a DHL parcel which had been intercepted by the Guam Drug Enforcement Agency, on the ground that the affidavit supporting the application for the search warrant was not supported by probable cause. The district court denied the motion, and Wall entered a conditional plea

Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-8-2006 USA v. Wall Precedential or Non-Precedential: P

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 27, 2004

*20 COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge. Appellant Mitchell Wall raises several challenges to his convictions and sentence following a pair of jury trials on drug offenses charged in two separate indictments, one alleging cocaine distribution resulting in a death and the other alleging a scheme to unlawfully obtain

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED. Defendant Frederick Wall timely appeals from a judgment of conviction entered by the District Court on July 27, 2001. On December 11, 2000, Wall pleaded guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement with the Government to one count of conspiracy to commit mail, wire, and

PER CURIAM. Richmond Wall seeks to appeal the district court’s order and opinion denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wall, No. CR-98-177-A (E.D. Va. filed Sept.

188 F.Supp.2d 1 (2002) UNITED STATES of America v. Mitchell WALL, Defendant No. CR. 00-77-P-C. United States District Court, D. Maine. February 20, 2002. Robert M. Napolitano, Neale A. Duffett, Esq., Cloutier, Barrett, Cloutier & Conley, Portland, ME, for Mitchell Wall, defendant. Helene Kazanjian, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, ME, for U.S.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JESSE WALL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-01901 (UNA) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

KING, Chief Judge: Defendant-appellant Abraham P. Wall challenges the sentence imposed by the district court after he pleaded guilty to possessing marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The issue for our decision is whether, for purposes of sentencing Wall, the district court properly included certain incidents as relevant conduct pursuant to

USCA11 Case: 20-10730 Document: 167-1 Date Filed: 09/06/2024 Page: 1 of 38 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-10730 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,