Cases

06/22/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 14, 2020 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL WRIGHT Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2018-B-1127 Monte Watkins, Judge ___________________________________

Honorable Susan M. Brnovich, United States District Judge There are seven defendants in this matter. Of which, six have joined the motion before the Court. Defendants Joye Vaught and Andrew Padilla filed a motion to dismiss the indictment against them or, in the alternative, a motion to allow their counsel to withdraw. (Doc. 456). Defendants James Larkin (Doc. 463), Scott Spear (Doc. 464), Michael Lacey (Doc. 465), and John Brunst (

Based on the Court's analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED : 1. Petitioner Sophia Wilansky's motion for the return of seized property, (Dkt. 10), is DENIED . 2. Respondents' motion to dismiss, (Dkt. 29), is GRANTED . 3. Petitioner Sophia Wilansky's complaint, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

MOORE, Circuit Judge. Appellants, a putative class of over 300 former sailors, appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of their challenges to the Navy’s implementation of an Enlisted Retention Board (ERB) that resulted in their honorable discharges. We affirm. Background In a March 20

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1963 SHAWN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NAVEEN RAJOLI and TARA POWERS, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Sou

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2022-2559 _____________________________ SHAWN M. DAUGHERTY, DON G. RICHTER, JOHN S. BRIGHT, DEBORAH A. BRIGHT, RONALD E. CARNEY, DANIEL WRIGHT, DIXIE WRIGHT, MICHAEL J. GORDON, JULIE D. GORDON, and BENJAMIN LUKE BOYD, Appellants, v. ROBERT NEIL MCDAVID, GEORGIA ARAMINTA MCDAVID, CHARLES H. MAYNARD, MICHAEL BENJAMIN

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION .. .8 BACKGROUND.. .9 I. The Parties and Proposed Merger... 9 II. Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage.. .11 III. The Public Exchanges... 16 IV. Procedural History...

[Cite as State v. Wright, 2022-Ohio-1537.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-20-1206 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0201902202 v. Justin Wright DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant

08/25/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 28, 2022 SHAWN L. PAYNE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 100235 Steven Wayne Sword, Judge ___________________________________

497 F.3d 1244 (2007) Frank E. ADAIR, Cynthia A. Adams, Joseph Aldridge, Emory T. Allen, Jodee B. Anderson, Alfredo Arias, Joseph W. Arnett, Lisa D. Ayres, Clyde J. Baker, Sr., Paul E. Barnard, Charles M. Bell, Anthony O. Benjamin, Roy E. Beverly, Archie S. Boatright, Jr., Terry James Boulineau, John Bradford, Mary Ann Branch, Danny L. Brantley, Jodi Britt, Yancie W. Britt, Michael E. Brown, Prentice Kerry Brown, Willie M. Brown, Donret G. Buckley, Gregor

AMENDED ORDER ZILLY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff United States brings this action in its own right and on behalf of Plaintiff-Intervenor Lummi Indian Nation (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), seeking a declaration that the Treaty of Point Elliott impliedly reserved the. groundwater under the Lum-mi Peninsula for the use and benefit of the Lummi Nation. Defendant State of W

357 F.Supp.2d 1228 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Charles ACOSTA et al., Defendants. No. CR-S-03-542-JCM(PAL). United States District Court, D. Nevada. January 31, 2005. *1230 Eric Johnson, Esq., Chief, Organized Crime Strike Force, Andrew Duncan, Esq., Office of the United States Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for plai

GOULD, Circuit Judge: This is a case about the ancient human remains of a man who hunted and lived, or at least journeyed, in the Columbia Plateau an estimated 8340 to 9200 years ago, a time predating all recorded history from any place in the world, a time before the oldest cities of our world had been founded, a time so ancient that the pristine and untouched land and the primitive cultures that may have lived on it are not

ORDER The opinion published at 357 F.3d 962 (9th Cir.2004) filed on February 4, 2004 is amended so that footnote 20 should read: In so holding, we necessarily determine that no reasonable person could conclude on this record that Kennewick Man is “Native American” under NAG-PRA. See Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 366-67, 118 S.Ct. 818, 139 L.Ed.2d 797 (1998) (h

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 02-3445 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. After a two-week trial, a jury found Anthony Steven Wright guilty of two federal offenses. He was convicted on Count I of kidnaping in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201 (2000) and on Count II of knowingly brandishing a firearm in furtherance of a ciime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) (2000). The district court

168 F.Supp.2d 754 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff(s), v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, et al., Defendant(s). No. 5:97CV894. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 25, 2001. *755 *756 *757 *758</

Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca

565 F.3d 1195 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel., Michael M. MEYER; Patricia J. Szerlip, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HORIZON HEALTH CORPORATION; Summit Medical Center; Sukhdeep Grewal, M.D., Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-17084. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted January 13, 2009. Filed May 14, 2009.