Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. WARD”
United States v. Wardpublic domain
Appellate Case: 23-7088 Document: 96-1 Date Filed: 05/06/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 6, 2025
United States v. Wardpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Wesley Shea Ward has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ward has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of
United States v. Ward Wesley Wrightpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0067p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │
United States v. Wardpublic domain
Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court. Contrary to his pleas, Culinary Specialist Seaman Apprentice (E-2) Darron D. Ward, Jr., was convicted by a panel of officer and enlisted members sitting as a general court-martial of fleeing apprehension, rape, and communicating a threat, in violation of Articles 95, 120, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C
United States v. Wardpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jevon Anthony Ward appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled “Motion for Court to Request that the United States Attorney Consider Exercising [its] Discretion by Withdrawing Additional 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) of Movant’s Conviction.” We have reviewed the record and find
United States v. Wardpublic domain
CCA 201400021. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue: THE CONVENING AUTHORITY ISSUED AN INSTRUCTION THAT LIMITED COURT-MARTIAL MEMBER NOMINATIONS TO PERSONNEL ONLY IN THE PAY-GRADES BETWEEN E-7 AND 0-5. THE LOWER COURT FOUND THIS SYSTEMATIC EXCLUSION OF PERSONNE
United States v. Wardpublic domain
CCA 201400021. Appellee’s motion for leave to file a corrected brief is granted.
United States v. Wardpublic domain
CCA 201400021. On consideration of Appellant’s motion for leave to file and motion to file a corrected brief, and motion for leave to file and motion to file a substitute joint appendix, it is ordered that said motions are hereby granted.
United States v. Wardpublic domain
CCA 38376. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 12, 2015.
United States v. Wardpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THOMAS A. VARLAN, Chief Judge. This criminal case is before the Court on the defendant’s pro se Motion for Modification of Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 [Doc. 93]. Amendment 750 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) implemented the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (“FSA”) and reduced the base offense level for most offenses involving crack cocaine
United States v. Wardpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David Clarence Ward appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his criminal case. Ward asserted that his felon in possession of a firearm conviction was a lesser included offense of his armed bank robbery conviction. However, neither the federal
United States v. Wardpublic domain
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charles Ward seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting, in part, the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion, as well as its order denying him a certifícate of appealability. The district cour
United States v. Ward, Jr.public domain
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.R. MCFARLANE, K.M. MCDONALD, M.C. HOLIFIELD Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARRON D. WARD, JR. CULINARY SPECIALIST SEAMAN APPRENTICE (E-2), U.S. NAVY NMCCA 2014
United States v. Wardpublic domain
760 F.Supp.2d 480 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. David James WARD, Defendant. Criminal No. 96-61 (WHW). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. January 19, 2011. OPINION & ORDER WALLS, Senior District Judge. David James Ward moves pro se to correct his 1997 sentence of 720 months for kidnapping. He also requests that
United States v. Wardpublic domain
626 F.3d 179 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. Lawrence Scott WARD, Appellant. No. 09-4271. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) October 5, 2010. Filed: October 27, 2010. *180 Peter Goldberger, Ardmore, PA, for Appellant. Zane David Memeger, Robert A. Za
United States v. Wardpublic domain
598 F.3d 1054 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Lee WARD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-1882. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: December 17, 2009. Filed: March 29, 2010. *1055 Garry J. Corrothers, argued, Little Rock, AR, for appellant. Karen Whatley, AUSA
United States v. Wardpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Desmond Ward appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. *873§ 3582(c)(2) (2006) and lowering his sentence from 235 months to 188 months of imprisonment. We h
United States v. Wardpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Antwon E. Ward appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. <
United States v. Wardpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Desmond Ward appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. *873§ 3582(c)(2) (2006) and lowering his sentence from 235 months to 188 months of imprisonment. We h
United States v. Wardpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Steven Clinton Ward has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ward has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Ward’s claims of ineffective assistance of