Cases

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 417 (fifth judgment); 72 Fed. Appx. 193 (first judgment), 212 (third judgment), 224 (ninth judgment), 228 (eighth judgment), 974 (sixth judgment), 985 (seventh judgment), and 993 (fourth judgment); 73 Fed. Appx. 689 (second judgment).

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 417 (fifth judgment); 72 Fed. Appx. 193 (first judgment), 212 (third judgment), 224 (ninth judgment), 228 (eighth judgment), 974 (sixth judgment), 985 (seventh judgment), and 993 (fourth judgment); 73 Fed. Appx. 689 (second judgment).

Debra M. Brown, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This criminal case is before the Court on Javier Alejandro Moline-Borroto's motion to suppress, Doc. # 64; which was joined by Daniel Gustavo Pena-Morales, Doc. # 65; Valentine Sybreg Castro-Balza, Doc. # 68; Pavel Isaac Burgos-Coronado, Doc. # 69; Kevin Carlos Delgado-Mata, Doc. # 71; Joseph Nicole Vergara-Moran, Doc. # 72; and Cesar Augusto Salemi-Nicoloso, Doc. # 86. <

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-10354 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:14-cr-00525-RS-1 JOSE OCHOA, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for t

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN LIPTON HOLLANDER, District Judge. In October 2014, a federal grand jury returned a one-count indictment against Agustín Lopez-Collazo, charging him with illegal reentry into the United States, without consent, after having been previously removed from the country following conviction of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) & (b)(2). ECF 1. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-50407 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, August 17, 2016

OPINION OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Brigido Lopez-Chavez challenges his conviction for criminal reentry by making a collateral attack on his underlying removal order. He argues that his attorney in the immigration proceedings provided ineffective assistance of counsel in erroneously conceding his removability, failing to appeal the removal order t

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50336 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cr-00872-JAH-1 JESUS VALDEZ-NOVOA, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California John A. Houston, District Judge,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50336 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cr-00872-JAH-1 JESUS VALDEZ-NOVOA, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California John A. Houston, District Judge,

PER CURIAM: Jose Hernandez-Mandujano (“Hernandez”) was indicted for and pled guilty to unlawful re-entry1 after two U.S. Border Patrol Agents stopped him as he was driving eastbound at Mile Marker 15 on Interstate 10 near Lake Charles, Louisiana. Hernandez argued before the district court that all evidence deriving from this stop should be suppressed because the agents lacked reasonable suspicion

777 F.Supp.2d 464 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Julio Alfredo GOMEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant. No. 10-cr-768 (ADS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 18, 2011. *465 Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, by Assistant United States Attorney John J. Durham, Central Islip, NY

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Defendant Rosa Hernandez argues that no reasonable suspicion supported the stop of her car by a roving patrol approximately eighteen miles from the Rio Grande. We affirm. I The Laredo North Border Patrol Station is located 15 miles north of Laredo on 1-35, south of the intersection of 1-35

OPINION OF THE COURT CHERTOFF, Circuit Judge. Jose Augustin Torres appeals his conviction for unlawful re-entry into the United States after having been deported. On July 18, 2002, Torres was indicted for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The indictment also charged that, prior to his removal, Torres had been convicted of an ag

383 F.3d 92 UNITED STATES of Americav.Jose Augustin TORRES, a/k/a Juan Diaz, a/k/a Victor Torres, a/k/a Anthony Rodriguez, a/k/a Joselito Torres, a/k/a Martin Rodriguez Jose Augustin Torres, Appellant. No. 03-2574. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) January 23, 2004. September 7, 2004.

OPINION OF THE COURT (August 1, 2006) Riel Charleswell appeals from his conviction for re-entering the United States without permission after having been previously deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2). The District Court rejected Charleswell’s collateral challenge to the validity of both his original 1991 Deportation order and his 2001 Reinstatement

209 F.Supp.2d 659 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, v. Maxwell Edward CHRISMAN, Defendant. No. EP-02-CR-245. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. June 28, 2002. *660 Stanley M. Serwatka, Assistant U.S. Attorney, El Paso, TX, for the Government. Margaret Ann Katze, Assistant Federal Public Defender, El

166 F.Supp.2d 1116 (2001) UNITED STATES of America v. Paul Preston PERKINS. No. P-00-CR-270. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Pecos Division. September 25, 2001. *1117 *1118 Kelly Wayne Loving, Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for the Government. Merry A. Worley, Odess

281 F.Supp.2d 498 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, v. Richard GARCIA-JURADO, Defendant. No. 02-CR-1439. United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 27, 2003. *499 *500 Alphonzo Grant, United States Attorney's Office, Brooklyn, NY, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

OPINION FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge: Alfredo Rolando Lawrence, a native and citizen of Panama, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) determination that he is not eligible for relief pursuant to former Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) § 212(c) (8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (1992)) because he is an 'aggravated felon, who filed his appl

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, Smith challenges a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) order denying Smith’s application for the discretionary relief of cancellation of removal. The BIA concluded that Smith was ineligible for this discretionary relief because he had been convicted of an “aggravated felo