Cases

PER CURIAM.* Juan Manuel Rosales-Villalobos appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty *975plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Rosales contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that

Filed 1/13/14 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE THE PEOPLE, B244436 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA390587) v. LUIS F. ROSALES, Defendant and A

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied,

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 417 (fifth judgment); 72 Fed. Appx. 193 (first judgment), 212 (third judgment), 224 (ninth judgment), 228 (eighth judgment), 974 (sixth judgment), 985 (seventh judgment), and 993 (fourth judgment); 73 Fed. Appx. 689 (second judgment).

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 417 (fifth judgment); 72 Fed. Appx. 193 (first judgment), 212 (third judgment), 224 (ninth judgment), 228 (eighth judgment), 974 (sixth judgment), 985 (seventh judgment), and 993 (fourth judgment); 73 Fed. Appx. 689 (second judgment).

544 U.S. 1014 DE LA CRUZ-GONZALEZv.UNITED STATESLOPEZ-CRUZv.UNITED STATESARAGUZ-RAMIREZv.UNITED STATESCANTU-RIOSv.UNITED STATESCASTILLO-BUSTAMANTE, AKA GARCIAv.UNITED STATESMENDOZA-SIFUENTESv.UNITED STATESTORRES-AVILAv.UNITED STATESHERNANDEZ-GONZALEZv.UNITED STATESVELA-SALINASv.UNITED STATESNIEVES-ALVAREZv.UNITED STATESRAMIREZ-SAN

Case: 25-40027 Document: 75-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/26/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 25-40027 FILED

Case: 18-31269 Document: 00515378642 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/10/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 18-31269 Fifth Circuit FILED

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-30006 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:18-cr-02050- SAB-1 JUAN CARLOS BASTIDE-HERNANDEZ, AKA Jesus Chavez-Gongoria, AKA Domingo Chavez-Lopez, AKA

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-30006 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:18-cr-02050- SAB-1 JUAN CARLOS BASTIDE-HERNANDEZ, AKA Jesus Chavez-Gongoria, AKA Domingo Chavez-Lopez, AKA

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-50096 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cr-00268-MMA-1 EDWIN RICARDO FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ca

MARTIN, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment: I agree with the result that Mr. Sea-brooks’s conviction and sentence are due to be affirmed. I therefore join Parts I and II of the Court’s opinion. However, I decline to join Part III of Judge Hull’s opinion. I believe it reaches legal issues beyond those necessary to decide this case. Yet because Judge Hull has written broadly about Mr. Seabrooks’s sen

JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to decide whether Florida felony battery is a crime of violence under the Sentencing Guidelines. Defendant Eddy Wilmer Vail-Bailon was convicted in 2014 of illegally reentering the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(1), after having been deported following a conviction for felony battery under Florida Statute § 784.041. Based on Vail-Bailon’s felo

Case: 15-10351 Date Filed: 08/25/2017 Page: 1 of 67 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-10351 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:14-cr-80117-KLR-1

658 F.2d 654 8 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 971, 9 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 240UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Inocenio Guterrez PEREZ, aka Jose Perez, and Jose De JesusRuvalcaba- Villalobos, Defendants-Appellants. No. 80-1320. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 12, 1981.Decided June 29, 1981.As Amended Sept.

TANG, Circuit Judge: I Appellant Ruvalcaba-Villalobos was convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and distribution of cocaine. On appeal he contends: (1) there was insufficient evidence of conspiracy and his connection to it to justify the admission of certain statements under the coconspirator exception to the federal hearsay rules; (2) his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses was violated b

155 P.3d 588 (2006) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jimmy J. VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04CA0730. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. VI. December 28, 2006. Certiorari Denied April 9, 2007. *590 John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Laurie A. Booras, Assistant Attorney General, Denver,

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 4, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court _______