Cases

KING, Circuit Judge: This case arises from the debtors’ bankruptcy filed under Chapter 7 on April 8, 2004, and the United States Trustee’s motion to dismiss for substantial abuse filed under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b) on July 9, 2004. The issue presented on appeal is whether a bankruptcy court should consider post-petition events in deciding whether to dismiss a case for substantial abu

Mr. Justice WAYNE, dissenting: I concur with Mr. Justice Catron and Mr. Justice Grier, for the reasons given by them, and for other reasons expressed in the printed opinions of Jirdge *213McAllister and Judge Hoffman, in dissenting from the judgment of this Court just announced in this case. I think that the claim and title of the petitioner, Andres Cast

Case: 20-50774 Document: 00515636320 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/12/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 12, 2020

OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether we have jurisdiction to review the validity of a judgment entered by a magistrate judge who failed to obtain the consent of both parties, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). We conclude that we do. Because the magistrate judge entered judgment on behalf of the district court without the parties’ conse

Case: 20-60778 Document: 00516772621 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/02/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 2, 2023

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment: I am happy to concur in substantial part in Judge Keenan’s thoughtful opinion. It does a fine job explaining why donning and doffing at the beginning and end of the workday is compensable. The court rightly notes that this case presents a different question than Sepulveda v. Allen Family Foods, Inc., 591 F.3d 209 (4th Cir.2

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS Ernest M. Robles, United States Bankruptcy Judge At issue is whether a 21-year old bankruptcy sale may be set aside for fraud on the court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)(3), even in the absence of specific allegations that the fraud reduced the sales price. *725The fraud alleged here was so ser

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES C. CACHEEIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Michael Han (“Han”) and Envión, Inc.’s (“Envión”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) [Dkt. 10]. For the following reasons, the Court will grant Defendants’ Motion. I. Background This case arises out of allegations that Defend

NAKAYAMA Justice, dissenting. I disagree both with the approach the majority takes in analyzing whether Bateman had the implied permission of Corpuz to operate the insured vehicle (the Mazda or the car) and its conclusion that because Corpuz “did not place ‘complete dominion’ over the insured vehicle in Aida[,]” Bateman “could not have driven the insured vehicle with the implied permission of Corpuz.” Majo

Alexander, J. (concurring in dissent) — I am in complete agreement with the chief justice’s conclusion in dissent that Martin Pang should stand trial for four counts of first degree murder and one count of arson. I write this concurrence simply to express my view that the dissent and majority opinions should not speculate on whether or not the real facts doctrine would preclude the trial judge from imposing a sentence

El Juez Asociado Señor Kolthoff Caraballo emitió la opinión del Tribunal. La Ley no crea el interés social, lo reconoce y delimita. La sociedad ci-vilizada impone ciertos compromi-sos entre la libertad individual y el interés social. En primer plano está el interés social en la seguridad general; el reclamo, el deseo o la exi-gencia de sentirse libre de aquellos actos y conducta que amen

ACCEPTED 06-15-00049-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 10/13/2015 11:22:43 AM

El Juez Asociado Señor Fuster Berlingeri emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Nuevamente debemos revisar unas determinaciones ad-ministrativas relativas al proyecto para la demolición del Condado Trío y la construcción del complejo conocido como Condado Beach Resort. I El 22 de mayo de 1998, Development Management Group (en adelante DMG) presentó ante la Administración de Reglamen

Decision of Mr. Chief Justice Negrón Fernández. I These appeals present a political controversy which comes to the judicial forum from a political administrative forum —the Commonwealth Board of Elections — whose decisions must be based on the full effectiveness of the status of Law, and on the protection of political and social rights which come into play in the administration of the Ele

Mr. Justice Rigau delivered the opinion of the Court. This case is of relatively slight pecuniary importance, but it presents an ethicojuridical problem on which we must pass judgment. The facts may be summed as follows: Silva, an employer insured with the State Insurance Fund, contracted the services of Vicente López in order to perform with other workers some repairs in his house. Vicente López, a carpenter,

ORDEN Debido a la no intervención del Juez Asociado Señor Re-bollo López y la Jueza Asociada Señora Rodríguez Rodrí-guez, se constituye una Sala Especial integrada por el Juez Presidente Señor Hernández Denton, el Juez Asociado Se-ñor Rivera Pérez y la Juez Asociada Señora Fiol Matta, para entender y disponer del caso CP-2005-8, In re Santiago Ríos. Lo decretó y firma: (Fdo. )Fed

El Juez Asociado Señor Torres Rigual emitió la opinión del Tribunal. La novación que languidecía en el Código Civil como uno de los institutos de más antiguo abolengo en el Derecho de obligaciones surge ahora con renovada vitalidad al socaire de la ley que reglamenta la terminación de los contratos de distribución en Puerto Rico.(1) Ley Núm. 75 de 24 de junio

Mr. Justice Pérez Pimentel delivered the opinion of the Court. The appellant Juan Colón Vidal was charged, convicted, and sentenced of the crime of rape, consisting in having had sexual intercourse with a female Maria Elena de Arce Chico, not his wife, by means of threats, force, and violence. The only question to be decided in this appeal, as the ground on which to base the reversal of th

Mr. Justice Todd, Jr., delivered the opinion of the court. The District Court of Ponce, on appeal, found Rafael To-rruella Cortada guilty of a violation of Act No. 17 of 1931, in relation with §36 of the Penal Code, which violation, according to the complaint, was that he “illegally and voluntarily, and acting as Manager of the Municipal Pier of Ponce which was created by an ordinance or franchise granted by th

El Juez Asociado Señor Rigau emitió la opinión del Tribunal. La Ley Azucarera de Puerto Rico, Ley Núm. 426 de 13 de mayo de 1951, según enmendada, 5 L.P.R.A. sees. 371-405, dispone, inter alia, que las centrales azucareras liarán las liquidaciones del azúcar correspondiente a los colonos tomando como valor del azúcar el precio promedio de los azúcares de Puerto Rico C.I.F. New York correspondien