Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Vicente”
United States v. Vicente Penado-Apariciopublic domain
REVISED August 13, 2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 12, 2020 No. 19-50401 Lyle W. C
United States v. Vicentepublic domain
STAHL, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a sentence imposed following a criminal conviction. On June 1, 2017, Appellant Michael Vicente ("Vicente") pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute oxycodone in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 <
United States v. Vicente Penado-Apariciopublic domain
Case: 19-50401 Document: 00515525033 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/12/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 12, 2020
United States v. Vicente Penado-Apariciopublic domain
Case: 19-50401 Document: 00515525690 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/13/2020 REVISED August 13, 2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
United States v. Vicente Cuevas-Lopezpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-10438 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:17-cr-00306- JGZ-DTF-1 VICENTE CUEVAS-LOPEZ, AKA Vicente Cuevas Lopez, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Cour
United States v. Vicente-Ariaspublic domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Defendants-Appellants José Peña-Santo (“Peña-Santo”), José Ramón Vicente-Arias (“Vicente-Arias”), Jonathan Joel Gil— Martínez (“Gil-Martínez”), and Manuel Liriano de la Cruz (“Liriano”) (collectively “Appellants”) were jointly tried and convicted of conspiring to import cocaine and heroin into the United States, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a), 960, a
United States v. Vicente Quirozpublic domain
KANNE, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Vicente Quiroz brokered large drug transactions. For his role in a methamphetamine transaction, he was convicted after a bench trial in January 2015. (Case No. 16-3518.) Then, in a second trial in July of that year, he was convicted by a jury for his role in a marijuana transaction. (Case No. 16-3510.)
United States v. Vicente-Lucaspublic domain
OPINION & ORDER JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Senior District Judge. Pending disposition by this Court is defendant Mansio Vicente-Lucas’ (hereinafter “Vicente-Lucas”) Motion to Suppress. Docket No. 28. Vicente-Lucas moves to suppress all of the evidence seized as a result of a warrantless search effectuated on his vehicle by Puerto Rico Police Department (PRPD) officers on the evening of April 7,
United States v. Vicente Fernandezpublic domain
312 F.Supp.2d 522 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, v. Juan Jose VICENTE FERNANDEZ, aka "Juan Jose Vicente Ferrandez," Defendant. No. 03 CRIM.496(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 31, 2004. *523 David Patton, Federal Defender Services Unit, New York, NY, for defendant. Samuel Williamson, United States
United States v. Vicente Alvarez-Hernandezpublic domain
BYBEE, Circuit Judge: DefendanL-Appellant Vicente Alvarez-Hernandez (“Appellant”) appeals his sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation. Appellant argues that the district court’s determination that he had previously been “convicted for a felony drug trafficking offense for which the sentence imposed was 13 months, or less,” U.S.S.G. §
United States v. Vicente Revolorio-Ramopublic domain
GRANADE, District Judge: Vincente Revolorio-Ramo, Misael Ca-mareno-Camareno, Wagner Hsti Rotter, Juan Alberto Paz, and Eduardo Garcia-Estupinon appeal their convictions for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute it while on board a vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States in violation of 46 U.S.C. app. §§ 1903(a), 1903(g), and 1903Q), and 21 U.S.C.
United States v. Vicente Roberto Jimenezpublic domain
LASNIK, District Judge: Vicente Roberto Jimenez appeals his sentence of 70 months imprisonment entered pursuant to a guilty plea to a single count of violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (Illegal Reentry). Jimenez contends that the district court plainly erred in concluding that he had committed a prior aggravated felony. Without the finding of prior aggravated felony, Jimenez would have
United States v. Vicente Pineda-Torrespublic domain
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. Vicente Pineda-Torres appeals his convictions for importation of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 and possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He argues that the district court abused its discretion when it admitted expert testimony regarding the structure of drug trafficking organiza
United States v. Vicente Rosal Abadpublic domain
RILEY, Circuit Judge. Vicente Abad (Abad), a 26-year old resident alien, was arrested and indicted for traveling from his United States residence in Florida to Iowa to commit criminal sexual activity with a 13-year old girl Abad met in an Internet chat room for 13- and 14-year olds. The magistrate judge ordered Abad released pending trial. The district court denied the governmen
United States v. Vicente R. Abad, Jr.public domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-3165 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Distri
United States v. Vicente Marchena-Borjaspublic domain
PER CURIAM. Vicente Marchena-Borjas appeals from a final judgment entered in the United *699 States District Court 1 for the District of Nebraska upon his conditional guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with int
141 F.3d 1186 98 CJ C.A.R. 1659 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,
United States v. Cardona-Vicentepublic domain
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Hector Cardona-Vi-cente (“Cardona”) of two counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent *825 to distribute and one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. On appeal, Cardona argues that the district court erred
Vicente-Arias v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
United States v. Gutierrez-Vicentepublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, Miguel Angel Gutierrez-Vicente appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and 6-month consecutive sentence imposed thereupon. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gutierrez-Vicente’s coun