⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Vermaas”

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 2003-12-03 · Published · cited 20× · 302 B.R. 650; 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 1603; 2003 WL 22889252
302 B.R. 650 (2003) In the Matter of Steven Edward VERMAAS and Jennifer Doreen VerMaas, Debtors. Steven Edward VerMaas and Jennifer Doreen Vermaas, Plaintiffs, v. Student Loans of North Dakota And United States Department of Education, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. BK00-80310. Adversary No. A00-8079. United States Bankruptcy Court. D. Nebraska. December 3, 2003.
State v. Vermaaspublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992-11-18 · Published · cited 2× · 116 Or. App. 413; 841 P.2d 664; 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2199
RICHARDSON, P. J. Defendant appeals convictions for possession, delivery and manufacture of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, an ORICO charge, ORS 166.720, and theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. He contends that the court erred by not giving him certain information before sentencing, that the search warrants involved were unconstitutionally overbroad general warrants, that the indictments were vague and that the court
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2006-04-12 · Published · cited 4× · 341 B.R. 14; 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 673; 2006 WL 1030425
341 B.R. 14 (2006) In re Janiford NMN WINSBOROUGH, Debtors. Janiford NMN Winsborough, Plaintiff, v. United States Department of Education, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-70113, Adversary No. 05-4174. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri. April 12, 2006. *15 *16 Janiford Winsborough,
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2006-03-29 · Published · cited 8× · 341 B.R. 6; 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 443; 2006 WL 833104
341 B.R. 6 (2006) In re Jonathan Bradley SHADWICK, Debtor. Jonathan Bradley Shadwick, Plaintiff, v. United State Department of Education, Keybank USA, N.A., and Curators of the University of Missouri Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 05-21412-7-DRD, Adversary No. 05-2076-DRD. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri. March 29, 2006. *
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957-12-17 · Published · cited 3× · 250 F.2d 265; 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4455
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge. Thomas H. Fisher has petitioned this court under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S. C.A. § 1651(a), for a writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, for a writ of prohibition or certiorari, to direct the respondent judge to vacate and expunge that part of his order dated August 12, 1957, denying the petitioner (and
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-02-07 · Published · cited 0×
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-6021 ___________________________ In re: Sara J. Fern lllllllllllllllllllllDebtor ------------------------------ Sara J. Fern lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. FedLoan Servicing lllllllllllllllllll
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2011-12-09 · Published · cited 0× · 462 B.R. 829
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS ROBERT D. BERGER, Bankruptcy Judge. Defendant Educational Credit Management Corp. (ECMC) moves to dismiss Debtor’s declaratory judgment action seeking to discharge his student loans under § 523(a)(8). Defendant’s motion is denied because Congress has provided a statutory discharge in the Bankruptcy Code separate and distinct from the disch
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-08-24 · Published · cited 1× · 588 B.R. 226
SALADINO, Chief Judge. The Appellant, Erin R. Kemp, appeals the order of the bankruptcy court1 denying her request for discharge of her student loan obligations to the United States Department of Education ("DOE") under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8). We have jurisdiction over this appeal. S
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-02-07 · Published · cited 2× · 563 B.R. 1; 77 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 316; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 333
SHODEEN, Bankruptcy Judge, The Defendant, U.S. Department of Education, appeals from the Bankruptcy *3Court’s1 determination that Fern’s student loans are dischargeable based upon undue hardship pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8). For the reasons that follow, we affirm. STANDARD OF REVIEW The determination of
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-12-07 · Published · cited 0×
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-6022 ___________________________ In re: Amy N. Piccinino Debtor ------------------------------ Amy N. Piccinino Plaintiff - Appellant
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · 2015-12-09 · Published · cited 0× · 543 B.R. 1
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Anita L. Shodeen, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Plaintiff Jason Daniel Ebelsheiser (“Ebelsheiser”) filed this adversary proceeding seeking discharge of his student loan debt pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8). The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(1) -and 1334. Upon consideration of the evidence and arguments the following findings of fact and conclusions <
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-12-07 · Published · cited 2× · 577 B.R. 560
SHODEEN, Bankruptcy Judge, Plaintiff, Amy Piccinino, appeals from the Bankruptcy Court’s1 determination that she failed to meet her burden of proof to establish an undue hardship pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8) to discharge her student loans owing to the United States Department of Education and Aspire Resources, Inc. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2015-12-18 · Published · cited 5× · 543 B.R. 601
MEMORANDUM OPINION THE HONORABLE DENNIS R. DOW, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Kenneth S. Johnson, Jr. and Debra L. Johnson (collectively, the “Debtors”, appearing pro se) filed a complaint seeking a determination that their student loan debt (“Student Loans”) owed to the Department of Education, Navient Solutions, Inc. (“Navient”) and Educational Credit Management Corporation (“ECMC”) (collec
State v. Turaypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021-07-08 · Published · cited 6× · 313 Or. App. 45; 493 P.3d 1058
45 Argued and submitted August 16, 2019; vacated and remanded July 8; petition for review allowed December 9, 2021 (369 Or 69) See later issue Oregon Reports STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. AHMED GBANABOM TURAY, JR., Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2016-08-03 · Published · cited 0× · 563 B.R. 540
ORDER AND OPINION Ben Barry, United States Bankruptcy Judge The debtors, Gretchen and Martin Young, filed their chapter 7 case on April 28, 2015. They received a discharge on August 4, 2015. On September 4, 2015, the debtors filed this adversary proceeding against the United States Department of Education [DOE], seeking a determination that their student loans are discharged pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)
State v. Turaypublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 2023-06-15 · Published · cited 36× · 532 P.3d 57; 371 Or. 128
128 June 15, 2023 No. 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. AHMED GBANABOM TURAY, JR., Respondent on Review. (CC 17CR59493) (CA A166973) (SC S068894)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2010-07-25 · Published · cited 2× · 378 B.R. 623
378 B.R. 623 (2007) In re Joyce Lavaun BROWN, Debtor. Joyce Lavaun Brown, Plaintiff, v. American Education Services, Inc., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 07-20112, Adversary No. 07-2010. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri. November 13, 2007. *624 *625 William P. Nacy, Hanrah
State v. Kellypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014-06-04 · Published · cited 5× · 2014 WL 2533186; 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 753; 263 Or. App. 361; 328 P.3d 757
NAKAMOTO, J. Defendant, owner and president of a construction company, challenges a judgment of conviction for racketeering, ORS 166.720(3), under an indictment that alleged multiple theft- and fraud-related predicate offenses stemming from defendant’s procurement and misuse of home-improvement loans. Defendant raises four assignments of error on appeal. He contends, first, that the trial court erred in denying his demurrer on
Davis v. Astruepublic domain
District Court, D. Nebraska · 2008-02-19 · Published · cited 0× · 545 F. Supp. 2d 973; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12536; 2008 WL 486603
545 F.Supp.2d 973 (2008) David J. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,[1] Defendant. No. 8:06CV643. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. February 19, 2008. *976 Gregory W. Peterson, Elverson, Vasey Law Firm, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff. Office of Gen
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2004-12-17 · Published · cited 0× · 318 B.R. 855; 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 2094; 2004 WL 3058512
318 B.R. 855 (2004) In re Ninnis Eugene EASLEY and Anita Easley, Debtors. Anita Easley, Plaintiff, v. Educational Credit Management Corporation, et al., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 04-20221, Adversary No. 04-2017. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri. December 17, 2004. *856 Janice A. Harder, Columbia, MO, for Debtors