Cases

PER CURIAM: Michael T. Verburg seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

ROBERT J. JONKER, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs in the above-captioned actions have filed a common motion in limine that seeks to prevent Defendants from introducing evidence or argument at trial regarding a bona fide error defense. Defendants oppose the motion, and in all the above cases have incorporated the argument contained in the Response brief filed in Case No. 1:13-cv-1328 (ECF No. 237).

121 P.3d 1283 (2005) STATE of Arizona ex rel. Gary VERBURG, City Attorney, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Michael D. JONES, Judge of the Superior Court of The State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge, Andrew Phipps, Real Party in Interest. No. 1 CA-SA 05-0187. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. November 1, 2005.

165 F.Supp.2d 223 (2001) Madeline FINN-VERBURG, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendant. No. 98-CV-0912. United States District Court, N.D. New York. August 14, 2001. *224 *225 Peter W. Henner, Clarksville, NY, for Plaintiff. Hon. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of t

122 F.Supp.2d 329 (2000) Madeline FINN-VERBURG, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendant. No. 98-CV-912. United States District Court, N.D. New York. November 8, 2000. *330 Peter Henner, Clarksville, NY, for plaintiff. Hon. Eliot L. Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York, Department of Law, T

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0161p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-App

961 F.Supp. 88 (1997) THE TOPPS COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. GERRIT J. VERBURG CO. and B.I.P. Holland B.V., Defendants. No. 96 Civ. 7302(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 28, 1997. *89 Hutton Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti (David G. Ebert, of counsel), New York City, for Plaintiff. Ostr

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 4, 2025 Decided July 17, 2026 No. 24-3019 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. CHARLES EDWARD LITTLEJOHN, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:23-cr-003

COOK, Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part): I agree with the principal opinion that the laboratory report was admissible as a business record and that the chain of custody was adequately established. Any question as to its authenticity was waived by a failure to object at the trial level. United States v. Miller, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 247, 49 C.M.R. 380 (1974);

Dethmers, J. During the year 1940 defendant city acquired a parcel of land specifically described as follows: “A parcel of land at the-southeast corner of Fuller ave. and Michigan st., N. E., Grand Rapids, Mi chi - .gan, commencing at said southeast corner running thence east 231 ft., south 300 ft., west 231 ft., north to beginning, being part of the NW 1/4 of NE 1/4 of Sec. 29-7-11.”

492 U.S. 406 (1989) WYOMING v. UNITED STATES ET AL. No. 88-309. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 25, 1989 Decided June 26, 1989 CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WYOMING Michael Douglas White argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Joseph B. Meyer, Attorney General of Wyoming, S. Jane Caton, Ass

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Appellant Barbara Garcia and appellee Earl Platt are tenants in common of real property known as the Garcia Ranch (“the ranch”). Garcia owns a life estate and her children a remainder in fee in an undivided *91one-third interest in the ranch; Platt owns in fee simple an undivided two-thirds interest in the ranch. In 1962, Garcia leased her lif

OPINION HURWITZ, Circuit Judge: In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, three Phoenix police officers allege that two other officers violated the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments when, pursuant to a state court order, they obtained DNA samples from the plaintiffs to exclude them as contributors of DNA at a crime scene. The district court dismissed the compla

154 P.3d 382 (2007) Charles R. STEWART, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Hon. Michael CARROLL, Phoenix Municipal Court, Respondent Judge/Appellee, and Phoenix City Prosecutor's Office, Real Party in Interest/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 06-0240. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. March 13, 2007. *383 Laurie A. Herman, Sc

Egan Jr., J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Connolly, J.), entered October 16, 2009 in Albany County, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs commenced this negligence action alleging that plaintiff Matthew J. Anton sustained injuries in June 2004 during the course of his employment as a correction officer with the Albany County Sheriffs Departmen

172 P.3d 856 (2007) Roger SENSING, a resident and citizen of the State of Arizona, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Jack F. HARRIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Phoenix, an Arizona municipality, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 07-0282. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. December 20, 2007. *857

212 P.3d 133 (2009) Randy L. JONES, a citizen and qualified elector of the City of Phoenix, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Mario PANIAGUA, in his official capacity as the Phoenix City Clerk; Phil Gordon, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Phoenix; Peggy Neely, in her official capacity as member of the Phoenix City Council and Vice Mayor; Thelda Williams, in her official capacity as member of the Phoenix City Council; Maria Baier, in her off

Reiber, C.J. ¶ 1. These consolidated cases stem from defendants Brian Grenier and Jessica Harris’s prosecutions for driving under the influence (DUI). 2 Defendants appeal the trial court’s denial of *59 their motions to suppress the results of th

207 P.3d 725 (2009) David LAKE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; Frank Fairbanks, in his official capacity; Mario Paniagua, in his official capacity; Jack Harris, in his official capacity, Defendants/Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 07-0415. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. January 13, 2009.