⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Vera Gomez”

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004-11-05 · Published · cited 0× · 390 F.3d 1
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Volume I of II No. 01-1647 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. José Rodriguez-Marrero, Defendant, Appellant. No. 02-1462 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004-11-08 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Volume II of II No. 01-1647 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. José Rodriguez-Marrero, Defendant, Appellant. No. 02-1462 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-12-23 · Published · cited 25× · 432 F.3d 967; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 28487; 2005 WL 3502055
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge. Rafael Pacheco-Navarette (“Pacheco”) and Victor Gomez-Vera (“Gomez”) appeal their convictions and sentences following each appellant’s guilty plea to being an alien in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(5) and 924(a)(2). Principally, appellants argue that their appeal waivers are invalid. We must also consider whether
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-10-22 · Published · cited 89× · 770 F.3d 1232; 2014 WL 5352727
OPINION FISHER, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to revisit issues that arise when law enforcement officers *1235 offer both expert and lay opinion testimony interpreting the meaning of intercepted telephone calls. We again emphasize that such expert opinions must
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024-07-16 · Published · cited 83× · 108 F.4th 114
22-6275 Vera Punin v. Garland In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2023 No. 22-6275 MAXIMO ROBERT VERA PUNIN, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. On Peti
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009-07-09 · Published · cited 0× · 634 F. Supp. 2d 217; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58467; 2009 WL 1971327
634 F.Supp.2d 217 (2009) Gladys RIVERA CARRION, et. al., Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES of America, et. al., Defendants. Civil No. 08-1498 (SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 9, 2009. Glenn Carl James-Hernandez, Jorge L. Gonzalez-Burgos, James Law Offices, Guaynabo, PR, for Plaintiffs. Rebecca Vargas-Vera, United States Attorneys Office, Di
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004-07-19 · Published · cited 11× · 376 F.3d 960; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 14842
376 F.3d 960 ALOE VERA OF AMERICA, INC., a Texas corporation; Rex G. Maughan; Ruth G. Maughan; Maughan Holdings, an Arizona corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.; Tax Management, Inc., Intervenors-Appellees, andGene Yamagata; Yamagata Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiffs,v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 03-15265. United States Cour
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004-07-19 · Published · cited 1× · 376 F.3d 960; 2004 WL 1631002
PER CURIAM. In 1997, the Bureau of National Affairs (“BNA”) published an article disclosing that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and National Tax Administration of Japan (“NTA”) had begun an audit of Aloe Vera of America and Forever Living Products Japan, two members of the Forever Living Products group of companies (collectively “Aloe Vera”). Aloe Vera wrote to BNA in protest and demanded BNA identify its sources. Eventu
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-05-02 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 1013
*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-05-02 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 1013
*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;
Gomez v. Fradinpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010-08-11 · Published · cited 21× · 41 So. 3d 1068; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11739; 2010 WL 3155000
41 So.3d 1068 (2010) Jose GOMEZ, Carlos Caro, George Chiodo, Helen T. Cipolla, Paul Farrington, Jr., Winifred Francois, Hilda Glassman, Margarita Guerra, Marcos A. Guzman, Claudia Krysiak, John C. Nuss, Bertha Perskin, Annette Pugliese, Pedro E. Ramirez Sanchez, Peggy Rapp, and William Woodward, Appellants, v. Sidney FRADIN, Herman Weiss, Vera Weller, Alexander Hirsch, and Lakes of Carriage Hills Condominium Association, Inc., Appellees.
California Court of Appeal · 2014-01-24 · Published · cited 75× · 223 Cal. App. 4th 377; 166 Cal. Rptr. 3d 899; 2014 WL 265523; 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 65
Opinion MANEELA, J. In the underlying action, the trial court ordered the entry of a default against appellants as a sanction for discovery abuse, and issued a default judgment awarding respondent damages and injunctive relief. Appellants contend that the discovery sanctions were improper, that the complaint stated no cause of action, that they received inadeq
Olibas v. Gomezpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2006-11-06 · Published · cited 1× · 481 F. Supp. 2d 721; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95942; 2006 WL 4447753
481 F.Supp.2d 721 (2006) Pascual Q. OLIBAS, individually and d/b/a Freedom Bail Bonds, Plaintiff, v. Arnulfo GOMEZ, Sheriff of Reeves County, Texas, Reeves County, Texas, General Star Company and Summit Risk Services, Inc., Defendants. No. EP-05-CA-225 KC. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. November 6, 2006. *72
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995-06-07 · Published · cited 3× · 53 F.3d 1212; 1995 WL 309583
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: On January 6, 1992, the United States Coast Guard seized the Panamanian vessel M/V Harbour (the “Harbour”) in international waters. Upon boarding the ship, the Coast Guard discovered cocaine concealed underneath zinc concentrate in one of the cargo holds. Appellants, 17 of the Harbour’s crew, were convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, and possession with intent to distribute
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995-06-07 · Published · cited 13× · 53 F.3d 1212; 42 Fed. R. Serv. 548; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14277
53 F.3d 1212 42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 548 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Yerco Huerta ROJAS, Edwardo Gomez Verdugo, ManuelFlores-Flores, Fernando Gonzalez Lopez, Manuel Perez Vera,Amillio Heriquez, Carlos Zulaga, Edwardo Marco Diaz, JuanAntonio Orlandi-Steiger, Guillermo Guerrero, Osvaldo Sotgiu,Louis Lorenzo Berrios, John Castillo Tramon, Claudio Perez,Luis Arangena, Hector Her
State v. Gomezpublic domain
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005-05-18 · Published · cited 274× · 163 S.W.3d 632; 2005 Tenn. LEXIS 473; 2005 WL 856848
OPINION FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ„ joined. E. RILEY ANDERSON, J., filed a concurring and dissenting opinion, in which ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., J., joined. We granted this appeal to determine whether the defendants are entitled to relief on their claim that admission of testi
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2001-10-25 · Published · cited 0× · 170 F. Supp. 2d 165; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17962; 2001 WL 1355956
170 F.Supp.2d 165 (2001) Luis A. ACEVEDO GARCIA, et al., Plaintiffs v. Hon. Roberto Vera MONROIG, et al., Defendants No. 97-2639(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 25, 2001. Israel Roldan-Gonzalez, Aguadilla, PR, Miguel A. Pagan-Rivera, Hao Rey, PR, Hector L. Guzman, San Sebastian, PR, for plaintiffs. Luis V. Villares-Sarmiento, Yahaid
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000-03-27 · Published · cited 7× · 91 F. Supp. 2d 464; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4639; 2000 WL 375267
91 F.Supp.2d 464 (2000) Claribel PAGAN-CUEBAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Roberto VERA-MONROIG, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. 97-2772(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 27, 2000. *465 *466 Eliezer Aldarondo-Ortiz, Aldarondo & Lopez Bras, Hato Rey, PR, for counter-claimant
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009-10-29 · Published · cited 112× · 585 F.3d 508; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23858; 2009 WL 3466021
585 F.3d 508 (2009) Andrés GUILLEMARD-GINORIO; María M. Noble-Fernández; Conjugal Partnership Guillemard-Noble; Lone Star Insurance Producers, Inc., Plaintiffs, Appellees, Jorge R. Urrutia-Vallés; Carolyne J. Wiewall-Navas; Conjugal Partnership Urrutia-Wiewall' Urrutia Vallés, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Fermín M. CONTRERAS-GÓMEZ, Individually; Dorelisse Juarbe-Jiménez; Individually and as Insurance Commissioner of Puerto Rico; Office of the Insuran
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-02-04 · Published · cited 39× · 812 F.3d 1005
MARCUS, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether significant threats and violence directed against a parent can constitute a grave risk of harm to a child under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“Convention”). During a contentious custody battle in Venezuela over their daughter, M.N., Hayet Naser Gomez (“Naser”),