Cases

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4646 Doc: 69 Filed: 06/18/2024 Pg: 1 of 14 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4625 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TRECIKA VANTINA DUNLAP, Defendant

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600163 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. MARIANO C. VERA Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellan

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Justino Loredo Vera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Loredo Vera has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the re

542 F.3d 457 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiro VERA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-20516. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. September 8, 2008. *458 John Richard Berry, James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, TX, for U.S. Marjorie A. Meyers, Fed. Pub. Def., Laura Fletcher L

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Juan Vera Ramos appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered on August 31, 2007, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Cogan, J.) convicting him, after a guilty plea, of one count of illegally reentering the United States after being deported following his conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The District

496 F.3d 1177 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fedel VERA-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-1128. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. August 7, 2007. *1178 Vicki Mandell-King, Assistant Federal Public Defender (Raymond P. Moore, Federal Public Defender, with her on the briefs), Denver, CO, for

MEMORANDUM ** After pleading guilty to illegally reentering the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, Rodrigo Vera-Jara appeals the district court’s application of a 16-point enhancement under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”) based on a finding that Vera-Jara had committed a crime of violence prior to being deported. U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). We affirm.

MEMORANDUM ** We have reviewed the record and the opening brief and conclude that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 247, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L

PER CURIAM.* Francisco Elias Vera appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Vera contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under

MEMORANDUM** Jose Juan Vera appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possession of counterfeit obligations in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472. Vera contends that the case should be remanded for resentencing because the prosecutor’s inaccurate statement of the applicable guidelines range (27 to 33 months rather than 24 to 30 months) resulted in Vera receiving a higher sentence than the distric

MEMORANDUM * Defendant John Vera appeals the district court’s denial of his pretrial motion to *331dismiss the indictment based on pre-indictment delay and destruction of potentially exculpatory evidence. Vera also contends that the court erred in calculating his base offense level and in refusing to depart downward. We have jurisdiction pursuant to

MEMORANDUM ** Ramon Vera-Zamora appeals the district court’s judgment and 21-month sentence following revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Vera-Zamora contends that the government introduced information regarding his prior criminal history at sentencing without giving him proper notice and that the district court may hav

231 F.Supp.2d 997 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. John VERA, Defendant. No. CR.00-309-BR. United States District Court, D. Oregon. June 26, 2001. *998 Michael W. Mosman, United States Attorney, John Laing, Assistant United State Attorney, Portland, OR, for the United States. Steven T. Wax, Federal Public Def

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Vera-Figueroa appeals his 42-month sentence following his guilty plea to reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the district court erred by failing to depart downward for over-representation of Vera-Figueroa’s criminal history. Because the record conclusively shows that the district court was aware of its authority to

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 01-1616 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Vera, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 98 CR 515--Robert W. Gettleman, Judge. Argued January 9, 2002--Decided January 22, 2002 Before Flaum, Chief Judge, and Harlington Wood, Jr., and Easterbrook, Circuit Judges. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge. Only one issue in th

119 F.3d 2 U.S.v.Vera** NO. 96-10329 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. June 17, 1997 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. ,No.4:95CR94A1 1 Dismissed.

41 F.3d 662 U.S.v.Vera** NO. 94-50099United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Nov 15, 1994 Appeal From: W.D.Tex., No. SA-90-CV-1369 1 AFFIRMED.

29 F.3d 624 U.S.v.Vera* NO. 94-10195 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. July 05, 1994 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. 2 A

974 F.2d 1335 U.S.v.Vera* NO. 91-5770 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Sept 16, 1992 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tex. 2

946 F.2d 1542 U.S.v.Vera* NO. 91-5539 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. OCT 09, 1991 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tex. 2 A