Cases

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge WALD. WALD, Chief Judge: On August 11, 1989, the district court sentenced Willie Williams to 10 months incarceration pursuant to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”). Williams appeals this sentence claiming that his case should be remanded for resen-fencing on two grounds: (1) that the district cou

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge. Alfred M. Jordan appeals three determinations made by the district court in sentencing him under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 to 10 years in prison for possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Jordan objects to the district court’s decisions to: (1) enhance the sentence for obstruction of justice pursuant

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in that part of the judgment affirming the defendant’s conviction. I write separately, however, because I cannot agree with that part of the judgment *1027affirming the sentence with its downward departure from career offender status.

Cite as 25 I&N Dec. 888 (BIA 2012) Interim Decision #3764 Matter of C-B-, Respondent Decided August 15, 2012 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) In order to meaningfully effectuate the statutory and regulatory privilege of legal representation where it has not

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

OPINION MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge: Mooneer Riad Tawadrus (“Tawadrus”) appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmation of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying him asylum and withholding of removal. Because the BIA summarily affirmed the IJ’s judgment without opinion, our review is of the IJ’s decision. Fajar

CHOY, Circuit Judge: Appellant is Fermin Castro-Nuno, a citizen of Mexico, alleged to have illegally entered the United States. He contests an order of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) that he voluntarily depart from the United States or be deported. This Court has jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), allowing for appeals from final decrees of the INS. We reverse. FACTS

65 F.Supp.2d 1077 (1999) J. Refugio GARCIA-GUZMAN, Petitioner, v. Janet RENO, et al., Respondents. No. C 99-2727 TEH. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 1, 1999. *1078 Lamar Peckham, Santa Rosa, CA, for petitioner. Robert Yeargin, U.S. Attorney's Office, San Francisco, Christine A. Bither, U.S. Depart

577 F.2d 577 Fermin CASTRO-NUNO, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 77-1260. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. June 26, 1978. Gary H. Manulkin, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Carolyn Reynolds, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., fo

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under

ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 4825837 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS