Cases

680 F.Supp.2d 816 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. VEHICLE 2007 MACK 600 DUMP TRUCK, VIN 1M2K189C77M036428, et al., Defendants in rem. Case No. 08-cv-14951. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. January 20, 2010. *818 Linda Aouate, U.S. Attorney's Office, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Motion of Kevin Roe, pro se, to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari on behalf of Vehicle Intelligence and Safety is denied.

505 F.Supp.2d 808 (2007) The COLORADO OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE COALITION, on behalf of its members, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES Forest Service, et al., Defendants, and The Wilderness Society, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Civil Action No. 02-cv-02014-WYD-MJW. United States District Court, D. Colorado. February 26, 2007. *809

609 F.Supp.2d 1321 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. $114,143.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM MICHAEL J. CALASH'S VEHICLE, Defendant. No. 09-80203-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 21, 2009. William H. Beckerleg, Jr., United States Attorney's Office, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiff. Ricardo P. Hermida, Ricardo P.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

OPINION OF THE COURT SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge. Ocean common carriers transport cargo between foreign countries and the United States. In this case, Plaintiffs 1 used the services of such carriers to transport vehicles. Some plaintiffs made arrangements with and received vehicles directly from the car

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. Defendant United States Forest Service (USFS) issued a Decision Notice in October 1997 limiting cross-country off-road vehicle (ORV) use to designated roads and trails in roughly 217,184 acres of the Routt National Forest (disputed area). 1 Plaintiff Colorado Off-Highway Vehicle Coalition appea

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

González, J. ¶34 (concurring in result) — I concur with the lead opinion’s decision to affirm the Court of Appeals, but this case is moot and should be dismissed on that basis. As the disputed appropriation expired more than a year ago, we cannot provide Washington Off Highway Vehicle Alliance its requested relief. Although we may review moot cases that present issues of continuing and substantial public interest, this case co

Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied.

Keith L. Phillips, United States Bankruptcy Judge Defendant Vehicle Acceptance Corporation ("VAC") has moved, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6),1 to dismiss the amended complaint (the "Amended Complaint") filed by Peter J. Barrett, Trustee for Debtor Chamberlayne Auto Sales & Repair, Inc. (the "Debtor"). In the Amended Complaint, Barrett (the "Trustee") s

*33United States v. Rigaud , 684 F.3d 169, 173 (1st Cir. 2012). To meet this burden, a defendant "must prove that the affiant in fact entertained serious doubts as to the truth of the allegations. Recklessness may be inferred from circumstances evin

Trooper Hassett then conducted the search of the car. First, he saw the bags on the seat in plain sight containing a flashlight that would attach to a pistol. Tr. 49:16-18. He secured the flashlight. Id. at 52:19-53:3. He became reasonably concerned that there might be a weapon in the vehicle. Id. He found the loaded Glock pistol under the passenger's seat. A further search of the vehicle after police towed it and it was i

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

IV. CONCLUSION The Court finds that the MVCRA does not apply retroactively to Plaintiff's negligence claim, and that Defendant sufficiently raised the affirmative defense of contributory negligence to survive a motion to strike. The Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Contributory Negligence Defense. A memorializing Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

7 There is one wrinkle when applying this general rule. When a court is "dealing with a so-called 'divisible' statute," it must "employ the 'modified categorical approach' to determine which alternative crime the defendant committed." United States v. Redrick , 841 F.3d 478, 482 (D.

Spina, J. In these consolidated appeals, we are asked to determine if a defendant’s admission to sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilty and a judge’s continuance of the case without a finding (CWOF) constitute a “conviction” as that term is defined in G. L. c. 90F, § l,

SO ORDERED.

135 F.Supp.2d 1142 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ONE 1997 FORD EXPEDITION UTILITY VEHICLE, VIN: 1FMFU18L1VLC03645, NEW MEXICO LICENSE 975JLW, Defendant, and Roberta A. Archuleta, Herman M. Archuleta, and Nationsbank, N.A., Claimants. No. Civ. 99-243 BB/DJS. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. March 20, 2001.