Cases

Case: 23-50309 Document: 75-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50309 ____________ FILED

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1125 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSÉ A. VEGA-FIGUEROA, a/k/a Pito Casco, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Daniel R. Domínguez, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 18-1189, 18-1395; 18-1258 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. LUCIANO VEGA-MARTÍNEZ, aka Lucio; RENÉ GARAY-RODRÍGUEZ, aka Gary, Defendants, Appellants. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted defendant-appellant Luz M. Vega of fifty-eight criminal counts stemming from her participation in a Medicare fraud scheme. Vega now appeals her convictions from the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, alleging several procedural defects. Additionally, although Vega does not challenge her Medicare fraud convicti

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Guadalupe Vega-Avila has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vega-Avila has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of

RULING JAMES J. BRADY, District Judge. Defendant, Raul Vega, moved for the suppression of all information and/or items intended for use at trial and Defendant’s statements (doc. 11). The United States filed a responsive pleading (doc. 18). Subsequently, on February 3, 2015, a hearing was held on the motion to suppress. In accordance with this Court’s request, Posb-Hearing Memoranda analyzing th

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Juan Vega has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Vega has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the rec

PER CURIAM: * Adan Vega-Salazar pleaded guilty to one count of importing 500 grams or more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a), 960(a)(1), 960(b)(2); and 18 U.S.C. § 2. His written judgment, however, describes the nature of his offense as “[i]mporting 500 *361kilograms or more” of cocaine. (Emphasis added.)

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Wenseslado Vega-Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vega-Vasquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed couns

CCA 20130000277. Appellant’s motion to extend the time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review is granted to March 17, 2015.

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Appellant Jesús Humberto Vega-Rivera (“Vega”), was charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 ’ U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) (Count One), and illegal possession of a machine gun, in violation .of 18 . U.S.C. §§ 922(o) and 924(a)(2) (Count Two). Pursuant to a plea agreement, Vega pled guilty to both counts. At sentencin

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.A. FISCHER, R.Q. WARD, K.M. MCDONALD Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NICOLAS VEGA JR. STAFF SERGEANT (E-6), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 201

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before M.D. MODZELEWSKI, R.Q. WARD, T.P. BELSKY Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JONATHAN B. VEGA LANCE CORPORAL (E-3), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 201300372 SPECIAL COU

SELYA, Circuit Judge. After entering into a written plea agreement with a commitment that the government would recommend a sentence of no more than 56 months, defendant-appellant Antoine Vega-Salgado pleaded guilty to being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court, without objection, fashioned a guideline sen

676 F.3d 708 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Larry VEGA, Appellant. No. 11-2437. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 13, 2012. Filed: April 17, 2012. *711 Chad Douglas Primmer, Council Bluffs, IA, for Appellant. Thomas J. Kangior, USA, Omaha, NE, for Appellee.</

Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Information BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, Chief Judge. Defendant Martin Vega-Ortiz (“Mr. Vega” or “the defendant”) is charged with a single count of being a removed alien unlawfully present in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He entered a not guilty plea on May 28, 2013. The defendant has moved to dismiss the information. The Court denies the motion

ORDER Alexandra Vega-Carrillo appeals his prison sentence of 70 months, the bottom of his guidelines range. He argues chiefly that the district court erred by failing to address his arguments in mitigation. But the court addressed all of Vega-Carrillo’s nonfrivolous arguments and adequately explained its determination of an appropriate sentence. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. Police arrested Vega-Carrillo in 201

825 F.Supp.2d 1 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. Juan Jose Martinez VEGA, Also known as "Chiguiro," Defendant. Criminal Action No. 04-446-51 (TFH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 30, 2010. *2 Pablo Quinones, Randall Wade Jackson, Eric J. Snyder, U.S. Attorney's Office, New York, NY, for United States

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul Vega-Cruz (Vega) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Vega has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F()R THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMER1CA v. Criminal Acti0n No. 04-446-51 (TFH) JUAN JOSE MARTINEZ VEGA, Also known as “Chiguiro," Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court are defendant Juan Jose Martinez Vega`s Motion For A New Trial [Docket No. 27l] and Post-Trial Motion F or Judgement Of Acquittal [Docket No. 272]. For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny the motions. The defendant contends that he entitled to a new trial