Cases

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 72 *1134Fed. Appx. 234 (third judgment), 952 (second judgment), and 963 (first judgment).

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 72 *1134Fed. Appx. 234 (third judgment), 952 (second judgment), and 963 (first judgment).

Case: 22-30656 Document: 298-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-30656 FILED ____________

(Reported below: 263 F. 3d 166); C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-435 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 8:20-cr-00171- v. JVS-FWS-5 JESUS RAMIRO GOMEZ, AKA Hunter, OPINION Defendant

*847(Reported below: 8 Fed. Appx. 704); (15 Fed. Appx. 404); (8 Fed. Appx. 712); (8 Fed. Appx. 710); (7 Fed. Appx. 592); (8 Fed. Appx. 709); (8 Fed. Appx. 706); (8 Fed. Appx. 671); (7 Fed. Appx. 599); *848

Case: 22-10384 Document: 00516848728 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/07/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 7, 2023

Case: 22-50164 Document: 00516796593 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED June 22, 2023

18-2811(L) USA v. Blaszczak 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ------ 4 August Term, 2020 5 (Argued: June 9, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2022) 6 Docket Nos. 18-2811, 18-2825, 18-2867, 18-2878 7 ___________________________________

Case: 19-50855 Document: 00516409077 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/27/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 27, 2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED July 3, 2025 No. 24-50149 ____________

Case: 24-50149 Document: 280 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED July 3, 2025

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0093p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plai

Case: 19-50997 Document: 00515936062 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 13, 2021

Case: 18-41134 Document: 00515384693 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-41134 April

STUART KYLE DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Carlos Vasquez-Puente appeals two special conditions of supervised release in his written judgment, arguing they conflict with the sentence orally pronounced by the district court. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm. *702 I. </

PER CURIAM: * Jesus Fernando Vazquez Rosales appeals the 57-month within-guidelines sen*838tence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States after removal. He argues that the sentence was greater than necessary to achieve the goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and was the

Case: 24-50149 Document: 441-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/24/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED April 24, 2026

OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 conditions the “power of the court” to adjudicate probation violations after the probation period expires on the issuance of “a warrant or summons” before the expiration date. 18 U.S.C. § 3565(c). In this appeal, we consider the court’s authority to retroactively

PER CURIAM: * Jose Antonio Siguil-Vasquez appeals the within-guidelines, 41-month sentence imposed for his guilty plea conviction of illegal reentry. He contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable and greater than necessary to satisfy the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. We review the substantive reasonableness of a sentence for an abuse of discretion. Gall v. Uni