Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Vasquez-Bravo”
Adams v. United Statespublic domain
350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black
Adams v. United Statespublic domain
MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position
Opinion issued August 25, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The
United States v. Baltazar-Sebastianpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 10, 2021 No. 20-60067 Lyle W. Cayce
United States v. Baltazar-Sebastianpublic domain
Case: 20-60067 Document: 00515774703 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 10, 2021
United States v. Maurice Collinspublic domain
Ripple, Circuit Judge. Maurice Collins pleaded guilty to distributing cocaine and crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Because of a prior felony drug conviction, he faced a statutory minimum of ten years in prison,
United States v. Maurice Collinspublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18‐2149 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. MAURICE COLLINS, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
United States v. Hernandezpublic domain
BRISCOE, Chief Judge. Defendants Mark Rosalez, Juan Ruelas, and Justin Hernandez, all of whom were federal inmates at the time of the underlying crimes, were jointly tried and convicted by a jury of conspiracy to assault anoth *1199 er inmate, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and murder in the se
United States v. Hernandezpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit March 29, 2013 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH C
United States v. Robert Kahrepublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM: Appellants Robert Kahre (Kahre), Lori Kahre (Lori) and Alexander Loglia (Log-lia) challenge their convictions for various criminal tax offenses arising from their use of gold and silver coins to pay wages and thus avoid the reporting of payroll and income taxes due. Appellants contend that dismissal of the indictments was warranted bec
United States v. Robert Kahrepublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10471 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:05-cr-00121- DAE-RJJ-1 ROBERT DAVID KAHRE, AKA Robert D. Kahre, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10528 Plaintiff-Appellee
United States v. Smithpublic domain
574 F.3d 521 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Gene Leonard SMITH, Appellant. No. 08-3775. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 11, 2009. Filed: July 24, 2009. *523 John P. Greer, argued, Spencer, IA, for appellant. John H. Lammers, AUSA, argued, Sioux City, IA, for a
United States v. Vasquezpublic domain
552 F.3d 734 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Leodan VASQUEZ, Appellant. No. 08-2530. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: December 10, 2008. Filed: January 21, 2009. *735 John P. Messina, argued, Des Moines, IA, for appellant. Daniel C. Tvedt, AUSA, argued, Cedar Rapids,
United States v. Percelpublic domain
553 F.3d 903 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sugentino PERCEL; Eric Vasquez, Defendants-Appellants. No. 07-20236. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 23, 2008. *906 John Richard Berry, James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, TX, for U.S. Henry E. Marines, Law Offices of Hen
Bigwood v. United States Department of Defensepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge This action arises out of requests that plaintiff Jeremy Bigwood (“Plaintiff’) submitted to the Department of Defense’s Southern Command (“Southcom”) and the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”) (collectively, “Defen
United States v. Bravo-Romeropublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Miguel Bravo-Romero appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Bravo-Romero contends that the sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to consider an unwarranted disparity between hi
United States v. Bravo-Romeropublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Miguel Bravo-Romero appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Bravo-Romero contends that the sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to consider an unwarranted disparity between hi
United States v. Simonsonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM** Michael Simonson appeals his conviction and sentence for Intent to Engage in Illicit Sexual Conduct and Attempted Enticement. See 18 U.S.C. § 2428(a)-(b). We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand. (1) Simonson asserts that the district court erred when it determined the United States immigration and customs officials did not violate his Miranda1
United States v. Gene Smithpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-3775 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United v. * States District Court
United States v. Guzman-Padillapublic domain
573 F.3d 865 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel GUZMAN-PADILLA, Defendant-Appellant, and Juan Vasquez-Rosales, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 08-50114, 08-50118. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 7, 2009. Filed July 23, 2009. *873 Karen P. Hewitt,