Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Esgar Vasquez-Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Vasquez-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along

ORDER Jose Trinidad Vasquez-Lopez appeals the sentence of imprisonment imposed by the district court upon his guilty plea to illegal entry into the United States as a convicted felon in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and § 1326(b)(2). The government expressly waives oral argument. Vasquez-Lopez waives oral argument by virtue of not responding to this court’s letter requiring him to show cause why oral argument is necessary. U

MEMORANDUM ** Gilberto Vasquez-Lopez appeals the 15-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Vasquez-Lopez contends that 21 U.S.C. § 841 is facially unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* WADE BRORBY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Appellant Ernesto

Judge Kathleen Cardone This consolidated appeal acutely illustrates the difficult and controversial nature of our country's immigration laws and their enforcement. Appellants are five asylum seekers who were apprehended shortly after entering into the United States with their minor children. Ultimately, they were separated from the children, prosecuted by the government for the misdemeanor offense of improper entry under

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Abel Vasquez-Reyes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vas*164quez-Reyes has not filed a

537 U.S. 1095 VASQUEZ-LOPEZv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-7387. Supreme Court of United States. December 16, 2002. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. 2

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: In unrelated incidents between October 21, 2017 and October 23, 2017, Appellants Blanca Nieve Vasquez-Hernandez, Elba Luz Dominguez-Portillo, Maynor Alonso Claudino-Lopez, Jose Francis Yanes-Mancia, and Natividad Zavala-Zavala were each apprehended by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) soon after entering the United States from Mexico. Appellants,

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Before GARWOOD, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is overruled and the opinion previously issued herein August 16, 2000 is withdrawn in its entirety and the following is substituted therefore. Defend

227 F.3d 476 (5th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.JUAN MANUEL LOPEZ-VASQUEZ, also known as Carlos Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant. No. 99-50918 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT September 15, 2000 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Appeal from the

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 70 Fed. Appx. 230 (second (first judgment).

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 48 Fed. Appx. 106 (first judgment) and 107 (second judgment).

MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Rodriguez-Vasquez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 127-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii), and possession with intent to *136distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetam

152 P.3d 940 (2007) 210 Or. App. 553 Panfilo VASQUEZ-LOPEZ and Maria C. Dominguez, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents Cross-Appellants, v. BENEFICIAL OREGON, INC., dba Beneficial Mortgage Corp., a foreign company, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Respondent. 021010108, A125270. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and submitted June 20, 2006.

ORDER The opinion in United States v. Lopez-Vasquez, No. 92-50271, slip op. 1043 (9th Cir. Feb. 8, 1993) is amended as follows: [Editor’s Note: Amendments have been incorporated into published opinion.] With these amendments the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the sugge