Cases

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. The government appeals from an order of the district court granting Defendants Appellee Luz Maria Valenzuela’s motion to suppress statements made after her arrest. Ms. Valenzuela and a codefendant were indicted for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), and posses

OPINION OF THE COURT IRENAS, Senior District Judge. Presently before the Court is Nicholas Valenzuela’s appeal from a final judgment of the District Court. First, Valenzuela claims that the District Court erred by considering the statements of cooperating co-defendants as evidence of Valenzuela’s managerial role in the offense. Second, Valenzuela claims that the District Court erred when it decided at the sente

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Motion to Suppress the Fruits of Illegal Arrest and Supporting Brief, filed May 10, 2018 (Doc. 43)("Motion"). The primary issues are: (i) whether Albuquerque Police Department ("APD") Officer Jason Harvey detained Defendant Apache Young when he took Young's pocketknife and told Young to wait with another police offi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion and Memorandum Brief to Suppress Evidence Recovered From the Defendants’ [sic] Vehicle and Post-Arrest Statements of the Defendant, filed November 30, 2011 (Doc. 31)(“Motion to Suppress”). The Court held an evidentiary hearing on January 27, 2012. The primary issues are:

761 F.Supp.2d 1172 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Roberto Javier HERNANDEZ-LOPEZ, Defendant. No. CR 10-0769 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. December 7, 2010. *1177 Kenneth J. Gonzales, United States Attorney, Norman Cairns, Assistant United States Attorney, Albuquerque, NM, Plaintiff, Brian

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit MAR 11 1999 PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: Savinovich appeals her convictions for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and for attempted distribution, raising evidentiary issues. Savinovich also argues that the statute under which she was sentenced is constitutionally infirm because it classifies punishment according to quantity of cocaine possessed without regard to its purity. Fin

HUG, Circuit Judge: On August 20, 1986, following an 18-day trial, a jury found Donaciano Hernandez-Escarsega (“Hernandez”) guilty of a series of drug-related offenses. Specifically, the jury convicted Hernandez of conspiracy to import marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960, and 963 (1982 & Supp. V 1987); conspiracy to possess marijuana with i

PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Claudio Lugo appeals his conviction in federal district court for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and re-entry of a deported alien, 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Mr. Lugo appeals, asserting that the district court erred by: (1) denying his right to a speedy trial, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)

Filed 7/18/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, B329800 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PA077370) v. MIGUEL ALBERTO ESQUIVIAS, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Da

ALOK AHUJA, Judge. Damiun Williams1 appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County convicting him of one count of possession of a controlled substance (phencyclidine or “PCP”)- He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the PCP found in a warrantless search of the vehicle he was driving, because both the initial vehicle stop, and the subsequent vehicle searc

880 F.2d 694 19 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 997, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,955 In re A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Debtor. (Eight Cases.)Rosemary MENARD-SANFORD; Karen Valenzuela; ConstanceMiller Engelsberg; Nancy Lauri Adams; CarolynHarris, Claimants-Appellants,v.Ralph R. MABEY; The Official Committee of Equity SecurityHolders; The Official Unsecured Creditors Committee of A.H.Robins Company, Incor

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the City of Albuquerque Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, filed Feb. 1, 2013 (Doc. 54)(“City MTD”). The Court held a hearing on July 12, 2013. The primary issues are: (i) whether to apply law-of-the-case doctrine to dispose of the City MTD using the findings and conclusions of the Court’s earli

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff Martha Wilson’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed July 6, 2011 (Doc. 31). The Court held a hearing on October 4, 2011. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendants Jennifer Jara and Daniel Vazquez seized Plaintiff Wilson in her home in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Un

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND AMENDED ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Martin Smith’s Motion for Summary Judgment Requesting Dismissal of Plaintiffs’ Complaint on Qualified Immunity and Other Grounds, and Memorandum in Support, filed May 12, 2014 (Doc. ll)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on November 24, 2014. Th

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants’ Opposed Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights, filed August 16, 2013 (Doe. 26) (“MTD”); and (n) the Plaintiffs Opposed Motion to Amend Complaint and Memorandum Brief in Support Thereof, filed May 30, 2014 (Doc

UNSEALED MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant J.M. Sharkey’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. I: Dismissal of Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment Illegal Seizure Claim (Count I) Based on Qualified Immunity, filed July 30, 2013 (Doc. 92) (“MSJ No. 1”). The Court held a hearing on Septemb