Cases

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Michael A. VALENTIN-ANDINO, Airman First Class United States Air Force, Appellant No. 24-0208 Crim. App. No. 40185 Argued January 14, 2025—Decided March 31, 2025

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Michael A. VALENTIN-ANDINO, Airman First Class United States Air Force, Appellant No. 24-0208 Crim. App. No. 40185 Argued January 14, 2025—Decided March 31, 2025

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before R.Q. WARD, J.R. MCFARLANE, K.M. MCDONALD Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUGO I. VALENTIN GUNNERY SERGEANT (E-7), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 2010

BAKER, Chief Judge, (dissenting): Consistent with my views in United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209, 217 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (Baker, C.J., dissenting), I respectfully dissent from the order to grant.

07-5289-cr (Con) United States v. Valentin (Mejia) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2009 (Argued: September 24, 2009 Decided: February 9, 2011) Docket Nos. 07-3419-cr (L), 07-5289-cr (CON), 08-2665-cr (CON) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

PRISCILLA R. OWEN, Circuit Judge: Valentin Carrasco-Tercero appeals the sentence imposed by the district court for unlawfully reentering the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1), contending that his prior New Mexico conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon was not a crime of violence within the meaning of § 2L1.2 of the federal Sentencing Gui

740 F.Supp.2d 289 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Rafael VALENTÍN-ROSA, Alberto Acevedo-Acevedo, Defendants. Criminal No. 10-0352 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 28, 2010. *290 Giovanni Jose Canino-Sanchez, Hector E. Guzman-Silva, Federal Public Defender's Office, Hato Rey, PR, for De

SUMMARY ORDER Defendants-Appellants Francisco Valentin and Yuri Garcia appeal from the November 21, 2005, final judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kaplan, J.), which resentenced Valentin and Garcia following a remand from this Court. See United States v. Garcia, 413 F.3d 201 (2d Cir.2005). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts,

656 F.Supp.2d 292 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Omar VALENTIN-CINTRON, Defendant. Criminal No. 09-242(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 23, 2009. *293 G. Andrew Massucco-Lataif, United States Attorneys Office, District of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Hector L. Ramos

PER CURIAM: Amador Valentin appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to recommend *786to the bureau of prisons that he serve his federal sentence at a state facility, which he filed six years after his conviction became final. Miguel Caridad, appointed counsel for Valentin, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to

CARNES, Circuit Judge: Valentin Cedeno and Angel Concepcion participated in a smash-and-grab job, using sledgehammers to bash open a large display case at Mayor’s Jewelers in Boca Raton, Florida. They made off with 108 expensive watches with a total value of $1,485,000. The store got the watches back after the police recovered the

OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge. Appellant Domingo Valentin pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute at least five kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, 846. The District Court sentenced Valentin to 120 months imprisonment, which was the statutory minimum for his *527offense. Valentin f

RILEY, Circuit Judge. Valentin Cuevas-Arrendondo (Cuevas-Arrendondo) was convicted of aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and being an alien in possession of a firearm, in violation 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5)(A). The district court

HARRIS, Judge: Following mixed pleas, Appellant was convicted of rape and false swearing, in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920 and 934. A general court-martial panel consisting of officer members adjudged a sentence of confinement for 1 year, reduction to pay grade E-l, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and a dishonorable discharge. The convening authority approved the se

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 21-2639 _______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. WILLIAM VALENTIN, Appellant _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court For the District of New Jersey (D.C. No. 2-18-cr-0403-001) District Ju

183 F.3d 758 (8th Cir. 1999) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,v.VALENTIN ESTRADA-QUIJAS, ALSO KNOWN AS VALENTINO Q. ESTRADA, ALSO KNOWN AS VALENTIN ESTRADA, ALSO KNOWN AS ANGEL JOEL ESTRADA, ALSO KNOWN AS ANGEL ESTRADE, ALSO KNOWN AS VALENTINE QUIJAS, ALSO KNOWN AS RICARDO MAGEN FLORES, ALSO KNOWN AS LEONEL CORONADO, ALSO KNOWN AS RICARDO FLORES, ALSO KNOWN AS ANGEL ESTRADA, ALSO KNOWN AS JOEL ESTRADA, ALSO KNOWN AS ANGEL JOE ESTRADA, ALS

USCA1 Opinion [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] United States Court of Appeals United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 97-1772

USCA11 Case: 19-14002 Date Filed: 04/05/2022 Page: 1 of 31 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-14002 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROMEO VALENTIN SANCHEZ,

952 F.2d 1394 U.S.v.Valentin (Francisco) NO. 90-3751 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Dec 17, 1991 1 Appeal From: D.V.I. 2 AFFIRMED.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.