Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, ATTANASIO, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jordan L. VIG Master-at-Arms Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied. Reported below: 167 F. 3d 443.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-1982 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeals from the United States v. * District Court for the

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Tom and Donovan Vig appeal their convictions, following a jury trial,1 for violation of section 2252(a)(4)(B) of the Protection of Children Against Sexual Exploitation Act of 1977, as subsequently amended, which prohibits the knowing possession of three or more books, magazines, periodicals, films, video tapes, or other matter containing any visual depiction of a minor engagi

R. Vig Props., LLC v Rahimzada (2023 NY Slip Op 00887) R. Vig Props., LLC v Rahimzada 2023 NY Slip Op 00887 Decided on February 15, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judi

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS JENNIFER CABALLERO, § No. 08-18-00033-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the 388th v. § Judicial District Court SANJIV VIG, § of El Paso

MANION, Circuit Judge. Marcus Fifer was tried and convicted on multiple counts of producing child pornography. On appeal he challenges several of the district court’s evidentiary rulings and one of its jury instructions. He also appeals the terms of his supervised release. We find no error and affirm. I. Background A. Search and Seizure In November 2013, police

89 B.R. 850 (1988) In re Kerry ERICKSON and Susan Erickson, Debtors. Marvin VIG, Plaintiff, v. Kerry ERICKSON and Susan Erickson, and Erickson Enterprises, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 87-00101-A, Adv. No. 87-0152. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho. July 22, 1988. *851 Richard J. Hayden, May & Hayden, and Terra

ORDER Patrick J. Schütz, United States District Judge • This long-running tax litigation arises out of an extraordinarily complex transaction that plaintiff Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”) engaged in with Barclays, a British financial-services company. The transaction — called “Structured Trust Advantaged Repackaged Securities” or “STARS” — included four key elements: (1) Wells Fargo wo

336 B.R. 279 (2005) Dr. Vibha VIG and Dr. Vibha Vig, M.D., P.A., Plaintiffs v. INDIANAPOLIS LIFE INSURANCE CO., et al., Defendants. Civ.A. No. 3:04CV824LN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. December 6, 2005. *280 Cynthia H. Speetjens, Madison, MS, Craig Robert Sessums, Jones, Funderburg & Sessu

384 F.Supp.2d 975 (2005) Dr. Vibha VIG and Dr. Vibha Vig, M.D., P.A. Plaintiffs v. INDIANAPOLIS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, L. Donald Guess, Individually, and as Trustee for the Xelan Welfare Benefit Trust, Steve Spencer, Both Individually and as Agent for Indianapolis Life Insurance Company, Michael E. Lloyd, Individually and in His Capacity as Agent for Williams Coulson, Williams Coulson, Attorneys at Law, and John Does 1-10 Defendants

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 593–706 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT July 1, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Ryan M. PALIK, Technical Sergeant United States Air Force, Appellant No. 23-0206 Crim. App. No. 40225 Argued December 6, 2023—Decided March 26, 2024 Military Judge: Colin P. Eichenberg

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge, specially concurring: I concur in this judgment because the district court properly ruled that the complaint failed to state a legal claim. The judge there ruled two years prior to Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 2123, 170 L.Ed.2d 1030 (2008), and did so correctly. I see no Rule 9(b) defect. The manner of payment by the United States is

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3504 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Clint Robert Schram llllll

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-3091 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Kyle Garrett Soto Defenda

246 F.Supp.2d 1060 (2003) Raphael DEMERY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Defendant. No. A4-01-117. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Northwestern Division. February 20, 2003. *1061 Debra L. Hoffarth, Pringle & Herigstad, P.C., Minot, ND, for plaintiff.

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence, filed December 1, 2017 (Doc. 78)("Motion"); (ii) the Defendant's Supplemental Motion to Suppress All Evidence Seized and Any Fruits of the Poisonous Tree Obtained as a Result of the Unlawful Search, filed July 24, 2018 (Doc. 141)("Supp. Motion"); (iii) the Defendant Bentley Streett'

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Stephan H. CLAXTON, Cadet United States Air Force, Appellant No. 17-0148 Crim. App. No. 38188 (rem) Argued May 9, 20